IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/badest/0560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Change in Input Relations in Bangladesh Agriculture, 1973-1995

Author

Listed:
  • Bilkis Raihana

    (Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Asia n University of Bangladesh, Uttara, Dhaka, Bangladesh.)

Abstract

The major forces of technological change and input substitution induced by relative factor price changes have led to important changes in the input mix in Bangladesh agriculture. The labour input has been replaced by fertiliser and irrigation. This change in input use raises significant issues with respect to the nature of factor substitution and input demand. This study sheds light on these issues by using the translog cost function approach. The findings reveal that the AES between land and fertiliser (N-F) shows increasing substitutability relationship over time, whereas the AES between fertiliser and irrigation (F-I) displays high substitutability throughout the study period along with a declining trend in the latter period.

Suggested Citation

  • Bilkis Raihana, 2013. "Change in Input Relations in Bangladesh Agriculture, 1973-1995," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 36(3), pages 43-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:badest:0560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bids.org.bd/uploads/publication/BDS/36/36-3/2_Bilkis.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay T. Akridge & Thomas W. Hertel, 1986. "Multiproduct Cost Relationships for Retail Fertilizer Plants," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(4), pages 928-938.
    2. Norsworthy, J R & Malmquist, David H, 1983. "Input Measurement and Productivity Growth in Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(5), pages 947-967, December.
    3. Laurits R. Christensen, 1975. "Concepts and Measurement of Agricultural Productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(5), pages 910-915.
    4. James A. Chalfant, 1984. "Comparison of Alternative Functional Forms with Application to Agricultural Input Data," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(2), pages 216-220.
    5. Ramon E. Lopez, 1980. "The Structure of Production and the Derived Demand for Inputs in Canadian Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(1), pages 38-45.
    6. Aw, Bee Yan & Roberts, Mark J, 1985. "The Role of Imports from the Newly-industrializing Countries in U.S. Production," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 67(1), pages 108-117, February.
    7. Berndt, Ernst R & Wood, David O, 1975. "Technology, Prices, and the Derived Demand for Energy," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 57(3), pages 259-268, August.
    8. Jabbar, M. A. & Islam, Md. Shariful, 1981. "Elasticity of fertilizer and its implication for subsidy," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 4(01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fuller, Frank H., 1999. "Farm-Level Feed Demand In Turkey," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21534, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Antle, John M., 1983. "The Structure Of U.S. Agricultural Technology, 1910-1978," Working Papers 225709, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    3. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "Problems in the Definition and Measurement of Technical Change and Productivity Growth in the U.K. Agricultural Sector," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232790, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    4. Griffiths, William E. & O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Cruz, Agustina Tan, 2000. "Imposing regularity conditions on a system of cost and factor share equations," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(01), pages 1-21.
    5. Hyunbae Chun & Sung‐Bae Mun, 2006. "Substitutability and Accumulation of Information Technology Capital in U.S. Industries," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 72(4), pages 1002-1015, April.
    6. Salem, M., 1987. "Productivity and Technical Change in Canadian Food and Beverage Industries: 1961-1982," Working Papers 243864, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    7. David H. Good & M. Ishaq Nadiri & Robin C. Sickles, 1996. "Index Number and Factor Demand Approaches to the Estimation of Productivity," NBER Working Papers 5790, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Giancarlo Moschini, 1988. "The Cost Structure of Ontario Dairy Farms: A Microeconometric Analysis," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 36(2), pages 187-206, July.
    9. Abdullah, Maisom & Osman-Rani, H., 1989. "A Translog Cost Estimation of Capital-labour Substitubility in Malaysian Manufacturing Sector," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 20(December), pages 43-60.
    10. Lila J. Truett & Dale B. Truett, 2011. "Whither Germany and the EMU In a Challenging Environment?," Working Papers 0019, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    11. Alexander Hijzen, 2004. "Trade in Intermediates and the Rise in Wage Inequality in the UK: A GNP Function Approach," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 224, Econometric Society.
    12. Kuo S. Huang, 1991. "Factor Demands in the U.S. Food-Manufacturing Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(3), pages 615-620.
    13. Abdullah, Maisom, 1989. "Capital-labor substitutability in Malaysian manufacturing: alternative estimates and policy implications," ISU General Staff Papers 198901010800009905, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    14. Yumei Liu & Wuyang Hu & Simon Jetté-Nantel & Zhihong Tian, 2014. "The Influence of Labor Price Change on Agricultural Machinery Usage in Chinese Agriculture," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 62(2), pages 219-243, June.
    15. Mundlak, Yair, 2001. "Production and supply," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 3-85, Elsevier.
    16. Lila J. Truett & Dale B. Truett, 2023. "The impacts of imports and trade liberalization in Brazil: Insights from an aggregate cost function," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 1013-1033, May.
    17. Richmond, J, 2000. "Separability and Specification Tests," Economics Discussion Papers 8832, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    18. Medina, J. & Vega-Cervera, J. A., 2001. "Energy and the non-energy inputs substitution: evidence for Italy, Portugal and Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 203-214, February.
    19. Shumway, C. Richard, 1983. "Economic Interrelationships in Texas Field Crop Production," Departmental Reports 256827, Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    20. Truett, Lila J. & Truett, Dale B., 2003. "A cost function analysis of import demand and growth in South Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 425-442, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bangladesh Agriculture; Input Relationships;

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • D00 - Microeconomics - - General - - - General
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:badest:0560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Meftaur Rahman, Cheif Publication Officer, BIDS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bidssbd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.