IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/apltrx/0382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of subjective beliefs in luck on the decision-making under risk: TV show analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Dolgikh, Sofiia

    () (National Research University Higher School of Economics (NRU HSE). Moscow, Russian Federation)

Abstract

This paper investigates into the questions of subjective beliefs in luck evaluation and their influence on the individual behavior. Based on the TV show «Deal or Not a Deal» participants behavioral data decision making under risk model with subjective probabilities has been provided. Model parameters are estimated via nonlinear binary regression with heteroscedastic random error. The results are as follows. First, there is statistical evidence that individuals subjective believes in luck influence their decision making. Second, risk-aversion parameters estimates may be strongly biased when parameters responsible for luck evaluation are omitted. Third, hot hand fallacy effect has been revealed: according to model parameters estimates lucky (unlucky) events make people think themselves as luckier (unluckier) persons. These results robustness has been shown by the means of model parameters reevaluation under different random error distribution assumption and sample division according to gender and education level.

Suggested Citation

  • Dolgikh, Sofiia, 2019. "The influence of subjective beliefs in luck on the decision-making under risk: TV show analysis," Applied Econometrics, Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 56, pages 74-98.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:apltrx:0382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    decision-making; expected utility theory; prospect theory; luck; hot hand fallacy; gambler’s fallacy.;

    JEL classification:

    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:apltrx:0382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Anatoly Peresetsky). General contact details of provider: http://appliedeconometrics.cemi.rssi.ru/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.