IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rib/revibe/rev4_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estructura biofísica de la economía ecuatoriana: un estudio de los flujos directos de materiales

Author

Listed:
  • María Cristina Vallejo Galárraga

    (FLACSO Sede Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador.)

Abstract

El argumento central de este trabajo es que la exploración de los flujos monetarios no es suficiente para revelar la realidad biofísica que caracteriza a la economía. En este estudio se realiza una lectura de los daños ambientales derivados de las actividades económicas combinando el estudio de ambas dimensiones, a través de un conjunto de indicadores de los flujos directos de materiales del Ecuador durante el período 1980 – 2003. Los patrones de extracción y uso de los materiales en el país durante este período se pueden resumir de la siguiente forma: en promedio cada año han ingresado a la economía alrededor de 56 millones de toneladas de materiales, de las cuales, 52,8 millones fueron extraídas del medio ambiente doméstico y 3,5 millones se originaron como importaciones. El consumo interno ha aglutinado alrededor de 41 millones de toneladas de materiales y el consumo externo (exportaciones) aproximadamente 15 millones. Esto determina un balance comercial físico negativo, que asciende a – 11,5 millones de toneladas. La riqueza de esta aplicación metodológica se puede apreciar desde diversos ángulos. Por un lado contribuye a la discusión sobre el intercambio ecológicamente desigual, tema en el cual, el Ecuador constituye un caso emblemático para el análisis, pues su intervención en el comercio mundial tiene como contraparte un menoscabo ambiental importante. Por otro lado, este trabajo confiere una visión más realista de las interacciones entre la economía y el medio ambiente, esencial para un país mega-diverso como el Ecuador. En efecto, el análisis del sistema económico como un circuito cerrado permite que se diluya su escala ambiental, y el metabolismo social es una forma de incorporar esta dimensión a la evaluación de la sostenibilidad fuerte de las economías.

Suggested Citation

  • María Cristina Vallejo Galárraga, 2006. "Estructura biofísica de la economía ecuatoriana: un estudio de los flujos directos de materiales," Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, Red Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, vol. 4, pages 55-72.
  • Handle: RePEc:rib:revibe:rev4_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.redibec.org/ccount/click.php?id=24
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hornborg, Alf, 1998. "Towards an ecological theory of unequal exchange: articulating world system theory and ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 127-136, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goddard, Jessica J. & Kallis, Giorgos & Norgaard, Richard B., 2019. "Keeping multiple antennae up: Coevolutionary foundations for methodological pluralism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Hornborg, Alf, 2006. "Footprints in the cotton fields: The Industrial Revolution as time-space appropriation and environmental load displacement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 74-81, August.
    3. Steven A. Mejia, 2023. "Global inequities in the prevalence of undernourishment," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(3), pages 329-344, May.
    4. Tunç, Gül İpek & Akbostancı, Elif & Türüt-Aşık, Serap, 2022. "Ecological unequal exchange between Turkey and the European Union: An assessment from value added perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Kosoy, Nicolás & Corbera, Esteve, 2010. "Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1228-1236, April.
    6. Muradian, Roldan & Martinez-Alier, Joan, 2001. "Trade and the environment: from a 'Southern' perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 281-297, February.
    7. Lehmann, Ina & Martin, Adrian & Fisher, Janet A., 2018. "Why Should Ecosystem Services Be Governed to Support Poverty Alleviation? Philosophical Perspectives on Positions in the Empirical Literature," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 265-273.
    8. Althouse, Jeffrey & Cahen-Fourot, Louison & Carballa-Smichowski, Bruno & Durand, Cédric & Knauss, Steven, 2023. "Ecologically unequal exchange and uneven development patterns along global value chains," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    9. Demaria, Federico, 2010. "Shipbreaking at Alang-Sosiya (India): An ecological distribution conflict," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 250-260, December.
    10. Matthew Sanderson & R. Frey, 2015. "Structural impediments to sustainable groundwater management in the High Plains Aquifer of western Kansas," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(3), pages 401-417, September.
    11. LaRota-Aguilera, María José & Delgadillo-Vargas, Olga Lucía & Tello, Enric, 2022. "Sociometabolic research in Latin America: A review on advances and knowledge gaps in agroecological trends and rural perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Eléonore Fauré & Åsa Svenfelt & Göran Finnveden & Alf Hornborg, 2016. "Four Sustainability Goals in a Swedish Low-Growth/Degrowth Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Villanueva Cortés, Paloma, 2015. "The external impact of the Green Economy: An analysis of the environmental implications of the Green Economy," IPE Working Papers 56/2015, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    14. Falconí, Fander & Ramos-Martin, Jesus & Cango, Pedro, 2017. "Caloric unequal exchange in Latin America and the Caribbean," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 140-149.
    15. J., Pablo Muñoz & Hubacek, Klaus, 2008. "Material implication of Chile's economic growth: Combining material flow accounting (MFA) and structural decomposition analysis (SDA)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 136-144, March.
    16. Gareth Gransaull & Evelyn Anita Austin & Guy Brodsky & Shadiya Aidid & Truzaar Dordi, 2022. "The Future of Divestment: Proliferations of Counter-Hegemonic and Post-Extractive Divestment Movements," Challenges in Sustainability, Librello publishing house, vol. 10(1), pages 34-46.
    17. Mostafa, Mohamed M. & Nataraajan, Rajan, 2009. "A neuro-computational intelligence analysis of the ecological footprint of nations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 3516-3531, July.
    18. Roger Fouquet & Ralph Hippe, 2022. "Twin Transitions of Decarbonisation and Digitalisation: A Historical Perspective on Energy and Information in European Economies," Working Papers 08-22, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    19. Li, Y.L. & Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2020. "Carbon network embodied in international trade: Global structural evolution and its policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    20. Kuchler, Magdalena, 2010. "Unravelling the argument for bioenergy production in developing countries: A world-economy perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1336-1343, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rib:revibe:rev4_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jesús Ramos-Martín (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ribecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.