IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v8y2019i3p111-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Environmental and Social Disclosures:Evidence from Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Altug Bicer

    (Departmant of Accounting and Auditing, Faculty of Business Administration,Istanbul Commerce University, Istanbul, Turkey.)

  • Imad Mohamed Feneir

    (Departmant of Accounting,The Higher Institute for Administrative and Financial Sciences, Benghazi, Libya.)

Abstract

The main reasons for corporate participation in environmental and social disclosure are stability, development, and continuity through participation in protecting the environment and optimizing the use of available resources. As well as the company practices and participation in society of the most important means to create a good image of the company in the community. There is a rise demand for companies to take accountability for their environmental and societal impacts. A core role of the Audit Committee (AC) is to help the board of directors in overseeing the company's reporting policy and oversees the quality of financial reporting in the company. This study examined the impact of audit committee characteristics on the level of environmental and social disclosures in listed banks in Borsa Istanbul. The results of the study showed that there is no statistically significant relationship between the characteristics of the audit committee and the environmental and social disclosures. Consequently, these characteristics have no effect on the volume or type of disclosure and their inability to predict them. Key Words:Audit Committe, AC Size, AC Meetings, AC Expertise, Environmental Disclosure, Social Disclosure

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Altug Bicer & Imad Mohamed Feneir, 2019. "The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Environmental and Social Disclosures:Evidence from Turkey," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(3), pages 111-121, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:111-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/262/252
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/262
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niamh M. Brennan & Jill Solomon, 2008. "Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 21(7), pages 885-906, September.
    2. repec:bla:ausact:v:27:y:2017:i:4:p:400-420 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:eee:jbrese:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:41-52 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:taf:acctbr:v:38:y:2008:i:2:p:137-159 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Irene Karamanou & Nikos Vafeas, 2005. "The Association between Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Management Earnings Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 453-486, June.
    6. Chen, Gongmeng & Firth, Michael & Gao, Daniel N. & Rui, Oliver M., 2006. "Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 424-448, June.
    7. Z. Jun Lin & Jason Z. Xiao & Qingliang Tang, 2008. "The roles, responsibilities and characteristics of audit committee in China," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 21(5), pages 721-751, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:111-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Umit Hacioglu). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.