IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v15y2020i3p55-60.html

Is the Accounting of the Future Online?

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeta Andreea Budacia

    (Romanian American University)

  • Lucian C-tin Gabriel Budacia

    (Romanian American University)

Abstract

The quality of accounting services is a set of dynamic characteristics, as the demands of modern technology impose the permanent creation and realization of new modern “products” with superior traits and performance on the delivery process. The evaluation of the quality of accounting services implies the appraisal of the final result, as well as of the actual delivery of the service; practically, the quality of the service cannot be separated from the activity of providing it. Today, the difference between an average service and a high quality one is given by the efficiency with which the people from the provider’s team work together and the systems through which they deliver the service. The relationship between entrepreneurs and accountants is inevitable, as accounting is a mandatory activity by law, but also a useful one. Providing high quality accounting services depends on the manner in which the provider and the beneficiary interact

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeta Andreea Budacia & Lucian C-tin Gabriel Budacia, 2020. "Is the Accounting of the Future Online?," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 15(3), pages 55-60, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:55-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/FA20/REBE-FA20-A4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diego Comin & Martí Mestieri, 2018. "If Technology Has Arrived Everywhere, Why Has Income Diverged?," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 137-178, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiago Neves Sequeira & Marcelo Santos, 2019. "Technology in 1500 and genetic diversity," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1145-1165, April.
    2. Mbassi, Christophe Martial & Messono, Omang Ombolo, 2023. "Historical technology and current economic development: Reassessing the nature of the relationship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & David Deming, 2023. "The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI," On the Economy 98843, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    4. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2022. "Three Decades of Research on Innovation and Inequality: Causal Scenarios, Explanatory Factors, and Suggestions," Working Papers 60, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2022.
    5. Åsa Johansson, 2016. "Public Finance, Economic Growth and Inequality: A Survey of the Evidence," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1346, OECD Publishing.
    6. Cirillo, Valeria & Fanti, Lucrezia & Mina, Andrea & Ricci, Andrea, 2023. "The adoption of digital technologies: Investment, skills, work organisation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 89-105.
    7. Roni Blushtein-Livnon & Tal Svoray & Itai Ficshhendler & Havatzelet Yahel & Emir Galilee & Michael Dorman, 2025. "Beyond Leaders and Laggards: A Typology of Renewable Energy Adoption Trajectories with Evidence from Off-Grid Communities," Papers 2505.22456, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    8. Comin, Diego & Rode, Johannes, 2013. "From Green Users to Green Voters," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63678, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Björn Brey, 2021. "The Long-run Gains from the Early Adoption of Electricity," Working Papers ECARES 2021-23, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Thomas Sampson, 2023. "Technology Gaps, Trade, and Income," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(2), pages 472-513, February.
    11. Yang, Xiaoliang & Barros, Lucy & Matthews, Kent & Meenagh, David, 2024. "The dynamics of redistribution, inequality and growth across China’s regions," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 613-637.
    12. Cristiano Antonelli & Christophe Feder, 2025. "The dynamics of technological congruence," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 779-796, June.
    13. Tyce, Matthew, 2020. "Beyond the neoliberal-statist divide on the drivers of innovation: A political settlements reading of Kenya’s M-Pesa success story," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    14. Andrea Szalavetz, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence-Based Development Strategy in Dependent Market Economies - Any Room amidst Big Power Rivalry?," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(4), pages 40-54.
    15. Bahar, Dany, 2018. "The middle productivity trap: Dynamics of productivity dispersion," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 60-66.
    16. William F Maloney & Felipe Valencia Caicedo, 2022. "Engineering Growth," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(4), pages 1554-1594.
    17. Krieger, Bastian & Licht, Georg & Pellens, Maikel, 2018. "New perspectives in European innovation policy," ZEW policy briefs 7/2018, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Nils Grashof & Alexander Kopka, 2023. "Widening or closing the gap? The relationship between artificial intelligence, firm-level productivity and regional clusters," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2304, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    19. David Perrain & Philippe Jean-Pierre, 2019. "The smart destination strategy, a key factor for changes in vulnerable tourist destinations? [La stratégie de destination intelligente, facteur clé des mutations des destinations touristiques vulnérables ?]," Post-Print hal-02144769, HAL.
    20. Mike W Peng & David Ahlstrom & Shawn M Carraher & Weilei (Stone) Shi, 2017. "An institution-based view of global IPR history," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(7), pages 893-907, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:55-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.