IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v11y2016i1p51-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of the impacts of managerial flexibility and fit of required flexibility on customer satisfaction: banks and financial institutes

Author

Listed:
  • Alireza KHORAKIAN

    (University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran)

  • Yaghoob MAHARATI

    (University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran)

  • Elahe NASERINEJAD

    (University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran)

Abstract

Today, organizations are seeking for new methods to increase customer satisfaction and gain competitive advantages to survive in a competitive environment. One of the methods of gaining competitive advantage is flexibility that helps organizations to respond changes in customer demands, competitor organizations and technology. It should be noted that, environmental conditions are diverse for different industries. This study indicates that the level of flexibility in organizations largely depends on environmental conditions. This is an appliedcasual survey. All of the 38 banks and financial institutes of the city of Mashhad (Iran), as the most important service organizations constitute the population of this study. The effect of flexibility dimensions (functional, structural, and strategic) on customer satisfaction with the fit of required flexibility dimensions are compared. The findings indicate that the effect of fit of required flexibility on all the three dimensions is greater than the effect of management flexibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Alireza KHORAKIAN & Yaghoob MAHARATI & Elahe NASERINEJAD, 2016. "A comparison of the impacts of managerial flexibility and fit of required flexibility on customer satisfaction: banks and financial institutes," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 11(1), pages 51-66, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:51-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/SP16/REBE-SP16-A3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karaesmen, F. & van der Duyn Schouten, F.A. & van Wassenhove, L.N., 1998. "Dedication versus flexibility in field service operation," Discussion Paper 1998-24, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Karaesmen, F. & van der Duyn Schouten, F.A. & van Wassenhove, L.N., 1998. "Dedication versus flexibility in field service operation," Other publications TiSEM bdf04f5c-c0a2-4b80-bb09-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Mihelis, G. & Grigoroudis, E. & Siskos, Y. & Politis, Y. & Malandrakis, Y., 2001. "Customer satisfaction measurement in the private bank sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 347-360, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Grigoroudis, Evangelos, 2010. "Visitors' satisfaction, perceptions and gap analysis: The case of Dadia-Lefkimi-Souflion National Park," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 163-172, March.
    2. Jiayin Qi & Li Zhang & Yanping Liu & Ling Li & Yongpin Zhou & Yao Shen & Liang Liang & Huaizu Li, 2009. "ADTreesLogit model for customer churn prediction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 247-265, April.
    3. Bérangère Gosse & Christian Hurson, 2016. "Assessment and improvement of employee job-satisfaction: a full-scale implementation of MUSA methodology on newly recruited personnel in a major French organisation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 657-675, December.
    4. Roberto Pico-Saltos & Lady Bravo-Montero & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Javier Garzás & Andrés Redchuk, 2021. "Career Success in University Graduates: Evidence from an Ecuadorian Study in Los Ríos Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Dehghan Nejad, Omid, 2011. "Does customer relationship management matter in the banking system? the case of Iran," MPRA Paper 31478, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Grigoroudis, E. & Siskos, Y., 2004. "A survey of customer satisfaction barometers: Some results from the transportation-communications sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 334-353, January.
    7. Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Sérgio P. Santos & Paulo M. M. Rodrigues & Ronald W. Spahr, 2014. "Evaluating retail banking service quality and convenience with MCDA techniques: a case study at the bank branch level," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Caterina Liberati & Paolo Mariani, 2012. "Banking customer satisfaction evaluation: a three-way factor perspective," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 6(4), pages 323-336, December.
    9. F A F Ferreira & S P Santos & P M M Rodrigues, 2011. "Adding value to bank branch performance evaluation using cognitive maps and MCDA: a case study," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1320-1333, July.
    10. Tien-Chin Wang & Ying-Ling Lin, 2009. "Using a Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Approach to Select Merged Strategies for Commercial Banks," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 519-536, November.
    11. Claudia Tarantola & Paola Vicard & Ioannis Ntzoufras, 2012. "Monitoring and Improving Greek Banking Services Using Bayesian Networks: an Analysis of Mystery Shopping Data," Quaderni di Dipartimento 160, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    12. Grigoroudis, E. & Siskos, Y., 2002. "Preference disaggregation for measuring and analysing customer satisfaction: The MUSA method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 148-170, November.
    13. Asish Saha* & Goh Yeok Siew & Hock Eam Lim & Nor Hayati Ahmad, 2018. "Assessing Banks’ Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction: An Analytical Framework," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 576-582:6.
    14. Arthur J. Lin & Hai-Yen Chang & Sun-Weng Huang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2021. "Criteria affecting Taiwan wealth management banks in serving high-net-worth individuals during COVID-19: a DEMATEL approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 274-294, December.
    15. Natalia V. Koshel, 2018. "More than Supervision: Identifying Opportunistic Bank Behavior through Marketing Tools," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 144-157.
    16. Jacquet-Lagreze, Eric & Siskos, Yannis, 2001. "Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 233-245, April.
    17. Paulo M.M. Rodrigues & Fernando A. F. Ferreira, 2011. "Evaluating retail banking quality service and convenience with MCDA techniques: a case study at the bank branch level," Working Papers w201131, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    18. Sagatdinova Dayana & Sha Zhen Quan, 2018. "Research and Analysis on the Influencing Factors of the Purchase Decision of the Consumers of Fast Fashion Goods in Kazakhstan," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(5), pages 1-37, March.
    19. Makaratzi, Elisavet & Metaxas, Theodore & Terzidis, Konstantinos, 2016. "Improving service quality to local communities via satisfaction measurament in Greece: The MUSA approach," MPRA Paper 70973, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Tsafarakis, Stelios & Kokotas, Theodosios & Pantouvakis, Angelos, 2018. "A multiple criteria approach for airline passenger satisfaction measurement and service quality improvement," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 61-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:51-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.