IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pts/journl/y2019i3p83-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role Of Wto And International Cooperation On Services Trade Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Alina HAGIU

    () (University of Pitesti, Romania)

  • Marinela BARBULESCU

    () (University of Pitesti, Romania)

Abstract

In the last decades most of the countries of the world have been adopting reforms regarding the increase of competition in their service markets motivated by the benefits regarding both the standard of living and overall economic competitiveness. Meanwhile, services have started to have an increasing share of GDP, demand for international services has increased and new demand is emerging. Governments cooperate regarding services trade policy because the landscape of services trade has evolved and transformed, present demand for internationally supplied services has increased, services economy has evolved from a model in which governments were solely and uniquely responsible for the supply of many infrastructural and social services to one where these services are provided also, or predominantly, by private actors in competition with each other, and because “going it alone” doesn’t allow all potential benefits to be reaped. The aim of this paper is to clarify why governments cooperate on services trade policy and why regulatory cooperation matters for business, to present how countries collaborate in the services sphere, to present the potential of trade in services for developing countries and to identify prospects for future cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina HAGIU & Marinela BARBULESCU, 2019. "The Role Of Wto And International Cooperation On Services Trade Policy," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 18(3), pages 83-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2019:i:3:p:83-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economic.upit.ro/repec/pdf/2019_3_11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petit, Sylvain, 2016. "International trade in services and inequalities: Empirical evaluation and role of tourism services," MPRA Paper 75206, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Bernard Hoekman & Aaditya Mattoo & André Sapir, 2007. "The political economy of services trade liberalization: a case for international regulatory cooperation?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 367-391, Autumn.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bas, Maria, 2020. "The effect of communication and energy services reform on manufacturing firms’ innovation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 339-362.
    2. Andrea Ariu & Giordano Mion, 2017. "Service Trade and Occupational Tasks: An Empirical Investigation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(9), pages 1866-1889, September.
    3. Erik van der Marel, 2012. "Trade in Services and TFP: The Role of Regulation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(11), pages 1530-1558, November.
    4. Giuseppe Bertola & Lorenza Mola, 2010. "Services Provision and Temporary Mobility: Freedoms and Regulation in the EU," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 633-653, April.
    5. Bernard Hoekman, 2008. "The General Agreement on Trade in Services: Doomed to Fail? Does it Matter?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 295-318, December.
    6. Philippa Dee, 2011. "Promoting Domestic Reforms Through Regionalism," Crawford School Research Papers 1107, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    7. Bernard M. Hoekman & Aaditya Mattoo, 2013. "Liberalizing Trade in Services: Lessons from Regional and WTO Negotiations," RSCAS Working Papers 2013/34, European University Institute.
    8. Rolf J. Langhammer, 2010. "Unordnung in der internationalen Handelsordnung: Befunde, Gründe, Auswirkungen und Therapien," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 11(1), pages 75-98, February.
    9. Altay, Serdar, 2018. "Associating Turkey with the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: A costly (re‐) engagement?," MPRA Paper 87454, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Quamrul Alam & Mohammad Abu Yusuf & Ken Coghill, 2010. "Unilateral liberalisation and WTO GATS commitments: the telecommunications sector in selected countries," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University, vol. 24(1), pages 43-64, May.
    11. Bianka Dettmer, 2012. "Business services outsourcing and economic growth: Evidence from a dynamic panel data approach," Jena Economic Research Papers 2012-049, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    12. Chauffour, Jean-Pierre & Maur, Jean-Christophe, 2010. "Beyond market access : the new normal of preferential trade agreements," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5454, The World Bank.
    13. Agnieszka Malkowska & Arkadiusz Malkowski, 2021. "International Trade in Transport Services between Poland and the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Bas, Maria, 2014. "Does services liberalization affect manufacturing firms’ export performance? Evidence from India," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 569-589.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trade policy; Cooperation; Services; Competitiveness; Performance.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2019:i:3:p:83-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alina Hagiu). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fepitro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.