IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/reveco/reco_0035-2764_1985_num_36_4_408864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protection et mobilité internationale du capital dans une économie où ce facteur est spécifique

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Yvars

Abstract

[eng] Protection and international capital mobilite . In an economy where this factor is specific. Bernard Yvars. In the long run. with a situation of protection, the returns of factors is conformable to the Stolper-Samuelson's theorem in a two commodities — two factors model — Howecer, in the short run the factor reward is specific, the capital is considered that no mobile, that is to say unable to allocation in the different sectors of the domestic econormy (The factor allocation is closely dependent of the relative pries evolution). In presence of a foreign capital factor, mobile internationally, the traditional results are contradicted and the « tariff factories » argument in less available. The evolution of the factors rewards is more conformable to the general Hecksher-Ohlin-Samuelson theorem according to the tendency of the international equalisation of factor prices ; the productions are changing in conformity with the Rybczynski theorern and with the preservation of a durable advantage for the foreign firme investing in the intensive capital sector. [fre] Protection and international capital mobilite . In an economy where this factor is specific. Bernard Yvars. In the long run. with a situation of protection, the returns of factors is conformable to the Stolper-Samuelson's theorem in a two commodities — two factors model — Howecer, in the short run the factor reward is specific, the capital is considered that no mobile, that is to say unable to allocation in the different sectors of the domestic econormy (The factor allocation is closely dependent of the relative pries evolution). In presence of a foreign capital factor, mobile internationally, the traditional results are contradicted and the « tariff factories » argument in less available. The evolution of the factors rewards is more conformable to the general Hecksher-Ohlin-Samuelson theorem according to the tendency of the international equalisation of factor prices ; the productions are changing in conformity with the Rybczynski theorern and with the preservation of a durable advantage for the foreign firme investing in the intensive capital sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Yvars, 1985. "Protection et mobilité internationale du capital dans une économie où ce facteur est spécifique," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 36(4), pages 687-714.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1985_num_36_4_408864
    DOI: 10.3406/reco.1985.408864
    Note: DOI:10.3406/reco.1985.408864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/reco.1985.408864
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/reco_0035-2764_1985_num_36_4_408864
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/reco.1985.408864?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mussa, Michael, 1974. "Tariffs and the Distribution of Income: The Importance of Factor Specificity, Substitutability, and Intensity in the Short and Long Run," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(6), pages 1191-1203, Nov.-Dec..
    2. Jones, Ronald W & Scheinkman, Jose A, 1977. "The Relevance of the Two-Sector Production Model in Trade Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(5), pages 909-935, October.
    3. repec:bla:econom:v:44:y:1977:i:174:p:131-44 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Burgess, David F, 1980. "Protection, Real Wages, and the Neoclassical Ambiguity with Interindustry Flows," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(4), pages 783-802, August.
    5. Neary, J Peter, 1978. "Short-Run Capital Specificity and the Pure Theory of International Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 88(351), pages 488-510, September.
    6. Jones, Ronald W., 1975. "Income distribution and effective protection in a multicommodity trade model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Mayer, Wolfgang, 1974. "Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibrium for a Small Open Economy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(5), pages 955-967, Sept./Oct.
    8. Brecher, Richard A. & Findlay, Ronald, 1983. "Tariffs, foreign capital and national welfare with sector-specific factors," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3-4), pages 277-288, May.
    9. Magee, Stephen P, 1973. "Factor Market Distortions, Production, and Trade: A Survey," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 1-43, March.
    10. Ruffin, Roy & Jones, Ronald, 1977. "Protection and real wages: The neoclassical ambiguity," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 337-348, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabine Engelmann, 2014. "International trade, technological change and wage inequality in the UK economy," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(2), pages 223-246, May.
    2. Feeney, JoAnne & Hillman, Arye L., 1995. "Asset markets and individual trade policy preferences," Discussion Papers, Series II 282, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    3. repec:elg:eechap:15325_12 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Akay, Gokhan H., 2012. "Trade and factor returns: Empirical evidence from U.S. economy," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 77-86.
    5. Toledo, Hugo, 2017. "The IA-CEPA and sector adjustments: A specific-factors model of production," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 201-211.
    6. Todd Sanderson & Fredoun Z. Ahmadi‐Esfahani, 2009. "Testing Comparative Advantage in Australian Broadacre Agriculture Under Climate Change: Theoretical and Empirical Models," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 346-354, December.
    7. Brati Sankar Chakraborty, 2009. "Protection And Real Rewards: Some Antinomies," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 56-70, February.
    8. Gokhan Akay & Can Dogan, 2013. "The effect of labor supply changes on output: empirical evidence from US industries," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 123-130, April.
    9. Benavente Escartin, José Miguel & West, Peter J. & Schwidrowski, Arnim, 1991. "Política comercial y equidad," Series Históricas 9580, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    10. T. Huw Edwards & John Whalley, 2002. "Short and Long Run Decompositions of OECD Wage Inequality Changes," NBER Working Papers 9265, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Ronald W. Jones, 2018. "Heckscher–Ohlin and Specific-Factors Trade Models for Finite Changes: How Different Are They?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: International Trade Theory and Competitive Models Features, Values, and Criticisms, chapter 8, pages 117-136, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Feenstra, Robert C. & Lewis, Tracy R., 1994. "Trade adjustment assistance and Pareto gains from trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3-4), pages 201-222, May.
    13. Hanson, Kenneth & Robinson, Sherman & Tokarick, Stephen, 1989. "United States Adjustment in the 1990s: A CGE Anaylsis of Alternative Trade Strategies," CUDARE Working Papers 198496, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. repec:ilo:ilowps:250014 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Magee, Christopher S.P. & Davidson, Carl & Matusz, Steven J., 2005. "Trade, turnover, and tithing," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 157-176, May.
    16. Debaere, Peter & Li, Tianshu, 2017. "The Effects of Water Markets: Evidence from the Rio Grande," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259187, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Rod Tyers & William Coleman, 2008. "Beyond Brigden: Australia's Inter‐War Manufacturing Tariffs, Real Wages and Economic Size," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 84(264), pages 50-67, March.
    18. Shoya Ishimaru & Soo Hyun Oh & Seung-Gyu Sim, 2017. "Trade preferences and political equilibrium associated with trade liberalization," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 361-384, April.
    19. Dogan, Can & Akay, Gokhan H., 2019. "The role of labor endowments on industry output in the short run: Evidence from U.S industries," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 281-291.
    20. John Mutti, 1981. "Regional Analysis from the Standpoint of International Trade: Is it a Useful Perspective?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 6(2), pages 95-120, August.
    21. Anderson, Kym, 1978. "On Why Rates Of Assistance Differ Between Australia'S Rural Industries," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 22(2-3), pages 1-16, August.
    22. Mario Larch & Wolfgang Lechthaler, 2013. "Whom to send to Doha? The Short-sighted Ones!," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 16(4), pages 634-649, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1985_num_36_4_408864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/reco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.