IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2014_num_469_1_10424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La décohabitation, privilège des jeunes qui réussissent ?

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Solard
  • Rosalinda Coppoletta

Abstract

[fre] À même niveau de diplôme, le niveau de vie des jeunes décohabitants est en moyenne plus faible, mais également moins dispersé, que celui des jeunes qui continuent de vivre chez leurs parents. Pourtant, les décohabitants ont des revenus d’activité personnelle beaucoup plus élevés, grâce à une situation beaucoup plus favorable sur le marché du . travail, et ils ne se déclarent pas plus souvent en difficultés financières. . . Plusieurs facteurs peuvent expliquer ces caractéristiques des décohabitants et des corésidents. . Rester au domicile des parents permet de profiter de leur revenu et d’économies . d’échelle. Ce choix s’impose le plus souvent aux moins diplômés, dont la situation face . à l’emploi est la plus difficile : il ne les empêche pas d’avoir des taux de pauvreté élevés et d’être dans des ménages qui ressentent souvent leur situation financière comme difficile. . À l’inverse, les jeunes de milieux plus favorisés ou mieux insérés dans l’emploi sont davantage en mesure d’assumer la chute de niveau de vie associée à l’autonomie. . Elle est vécue d’autant plus facilement qu’ils continuent à bénéficier des transferts intrafamiliaux mal pris en compte par les indicateurs de niveau de vie. C’est particulièrement . le cas des jeunes décohabitants en formation initiale dont plus de la moitié sont aidés par leurs proches. . . La décohabitation apparaît ainsi très sélective et cette sélectivité doit être prise en compte . pour étudier le niveau de vie des jeunes adultes et ses déterminants. On recourt pour ce faire à une modélisation jointe du niveau de vie en cas de décohabitation et du choix de . décohabiter. Elle confirme l’effet de sélection : le manque de diplômes et les difficultés . sur le marché du travail freinent la décohabitation. D’autre part, une fois pris en compte l’effet de sélection, les jeunes qui résident encore chez leurs parents auraient, à caractéristiques personnelles et d’emploi identiques, un niveau de vie de décohabitant plus faible que les autres.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Solard & Rosalinda Coppoletta, 2014. "La décohabitation, privilège des jeunes qui réussissent ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 469(1), pages 61-84.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2014_num_469_1_10424
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2014.10424
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2014.10424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2014.10424
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2014_num_469_1_10424
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2014.10424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stéfan Lollivier & Pascale Pollet, 2003. "Impact de la formation initiale sur les rémunérations au cours de la vie active," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 113(6), pages 801-827.
    2. Daniel Courgeau, 2000. "Le départ de chez les parents : une analyse démographique sur le long terme," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 337(1), pages 37-60.
    3. David Blanc & François-Charles Wolff, 2006. "Leaving Home in Europe: The Role of Parents’ and Children’s Incomes," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 53-73, March.
    4. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 1995. "Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumptions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 115-132, July.
    5. Laurent Caussat, 1995. "Les chemins vers l'indépendance financière," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 283(1), pages 127-136.
    6. Olivier Galland, 2000. "Entrer dans la vie adulte : des étapes toujours plus tardives, mais resserrées," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 337(1), pages 13-36.
    7. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    8. Christian Dustmann & María Engracia Rochina-Barrachina, 2007. "Selection correction in panel data models: An application to the estimation of females' wage equations," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 10(2), pages 263-293, July.
    9. A. D. Roy, 1951. "Some Thoughts On The Distribution Of Earnings," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 135-146.
    10. Brigitte Dormont & Sandrine Dufour-Kippelen, 2000. "Insertion professionnelle et autonomie résidentielle : le cas des jeunes peu diplômés," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 337(1), pages 97-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kadreva, Olga, 2016. "The influence of quantity and age of children on working women’ salaries," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 41, pages 62-77.
    2. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66.
    3. Kleibrink, Jan & Michaelsen, Maren M., 2012. "Reaching High: Occupational Sorting and Higher Education Wage Inequality in the UK," Ruhr Economic Papers 377, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Alyssa Carlson & Riju Joshi, 2024. "Sample selection in linear panel data models with heterogeneous coefficients," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 237-255, March.
    5. Driffield, Nigel L. & Mickiewicz, Tomasz & Temouri, Yama, 2013. "Institutional reforms, productivity and profitability: From rents to competition?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 583-600.
    6. Alexander Klein & Guy Tchuente, 2020. "Spatial Differencing for Sample Selection Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity," Papers 2009.06570, arXiv.org.
    7. Malikov, Emir & Kumbhakar, Subal C. & Sun, Yiguo, 2016. "Varying coefficient panel data model in the presence of endogenous selectivity and fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 233-251.
    8. Guastella, Gianni & Moro, Daniele & Sckokai, Paolo & Veneziani, Mario, 2014. "The capitalization of area payments into land rental prices: a panel sample selection approach," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 186375, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Paul Gregg & Lindsey Macmillan & Claudia Vittori, 2014. "Moving Towards Estimating Lifetime Intergenerational Economic Mobility in the UK," DoQSS Working Papers 14-12, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    10. Gianni Guastella & Daniele Moro & Paolo Sckokai & Mario Veneziani, 2018. "The Capitalisation of CAP Payments into Land Rental Prices: A Panel Sample Selection Approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 688-704, September.
    11. Christian Dustmann, 2014. "Selective Outmigration and the Estimation of Immigrants Earnings Profiles," RF Berlin - CReAM Discussion Paper Series 1402, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin) - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM).
    12. John Bailey Jones & Minhee Kim & Byoung G. Park, 2020. "The Wage Penalty for Married Women of Career Interruptions: Evidence from the 1970s and the 1990s," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(4), pages 783-807, August.
    13. Chirok Han & Goeun Lee, 2017. "Efficient Estimation of Linear Panel Data Models with Sample Selection and Fixed Effects," Discussion Paper Series 1707, Institute of Economic Research, Korea University.
    14. Adrian (Waikong) Cheung & May Hu & Jörg Schwiebert, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility and dividend policy," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(3), pages 787-816, September.
    15. Widenhorn, Andreas & Salhofer, Klaus, 2014. "Differentiation in demand with different food retail formats," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182777, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Zimmer, David M., 2010. "The role of health insurance in labor supply decisions of divorced females," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 121-131, May.
    17. Shankar Shaw, Tara & Raithatha, Mehul & Krishnan, Gopal V. & Cordeiro, James J., 2021. "Did mandatory CSR compliance impact accounting Conservatism? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3).
    18. Georgios A. Panos & Konstantinos Pouliakas & Alexandros Zangelidis, 2014. "Multiple Job Holding, Skill Diversification, and Mobility," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 223-272, April.
    19. Margherita Borella & Fang Yang & Mariacristina De Nardi, 2019. "The changing opportunities and outcomes of non-college educated Americans," 2019 Meeting Papers 206, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    20. repec:bri:cmpowp:13/332 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Inmaculada Garc�a-Mainar & V�ctor M. Montuenga-G�mez, 2017. "Subjective educational mismatch and signalling in Spain," Documentos de Trabajo dt2017-03, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Zaragoza.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2014_num_469_1_10424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.