IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_2002_num_156_5_6886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compétition électorale et impôt négatif : la trappe “informationnelle” à inactivité

Author

Listed:
  • Karine Van der Straeten

Abstract

[fre] Aux menaces bien identifiées que les charges fiscales pesant sur le travail peuvent représenter pour l’économie -sous-emploi, croissante réduite -peut s’ajouter un autre danger, de nature informationnelle. En effet, s’il est difficile d’obtenir de l’information sur les capacités productives des individus non employés, la fiscalité, en déprimant l’emploi, va réduire l’information dont dispose la société sur elle-même. On considère un modèle dynamique où à chaque période des élections ont lieu pour sélectionner la politique fiscale. Les croyances des électeurs sur la répartition des productivités déterminent la politique fiscale, qui elle-même détermine l’emploi, qui à son tour détermine les croyances révisées des électeurs. Al’état stationnaire, le taux de taxe et le taux de non-emploi sont au moins aussi élevés que ce qu’ils auraient été si la distribution des productivités avait été connue au départ avec certitude. [eng] Electoral Competition and Negative Tax : the Informational Inactivity Trap.. The tax burden on labour can weigh on the economy not only in terms of underemployment and reduced growth, but there is also a danger of an informational shortfall. While it is difficult to obtain information on the productive capacities of non-employed individuals, taxation, by depressing employment, will reduce the information available to society about itself. The authors take a dynamic model in which tax policy in each period is chosen by voting. Voters’ beliefs regarding the productivity distribution determine tax policy, which in turn determines employment, which in turn determines voters’ revised beliefs. At steady state, the tax rate and the non-employment rate are at least as high as they would have been if the productivity distribution had been known with certainty at the start.

Suggested Citation

  • Karine Van der Straeten, 2002. "Compétition électorale et impôt négatif : la trappe “informationnelle” à inactivité," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 156(5), pages 107-123.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2002_num_156_5_6886
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.2002.6886
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.2002.6886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.2002.6886
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_2002_num_156_5_6886
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.2002.6886?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gans, Joshua S. & Smart, Michael, 1996. "Majority voting with single-crossing preferences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 219-237, February.
    2. Anthony Downs, 1957. "An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(2), pages 135-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    2. Francisco Martínez-Mora & M. Socorro Puy, 2009. "Off-the-peak preferences over government size," Working Papers 2009-9, Universidad de Málaga, Department of Economic Theory, Málaga Economic Theory Research Center.
    3. Valentino Larcinese, 2007. "Voting over Redistribution and the Size of the Welfare State: The Role of Turnout," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(3), pages 568-585, October.
    4. Martínez-Mora, Francisco & Puy, M. Socorro, 2014. "The determinants and electoral consequences of asymmetric preferences," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 85-97.
    5. Bernasconi, Michele, 2006. "Redistributive taxation in democracies: Evidence on people's satisfaction," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 809-837, December.
    6. Sergey Sinelnikov & Pavel Kadochnikov & Ilya Trunin, 2008. "From Elections to Appointments of the Regional Governors: Major Challenges and Outcomes," Published Papers 2, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2008.
    7. Haavio, Markus & Kotakorpi, Kaisa, 2011. "The political economy of sin taxes," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 575-594, May.
    8. Jo Thori Lind & Dominic Rohner, 2017. "Knowledge is Power: A Theory of Information, Income and Welfare Spending," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 84(336), pages 611-646, October.
    9. Marcus Berliant & Pierre C. Boyer, 2022. "Politics and Income Taxes: Progress and Progressivity," CESifo Working Paper Series 10041, CESifo.
    10. M Socorro Puy, 2019. "Incentives for progressive income taxation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(1), pages 66-102, January.
    11. Giri Parameswaran & Hunter Rendleman, 2022. "Redistribution under general decision rules," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(1), pages 159-196, February.
    12. De Borger, Bruno & Russo, Antonio, 2018. "The political economy of cordon tolls," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 133-148.
    13. George Tridimas & Stanley L. Winer, 2004. "A Contribution to the Political Economy of Government Size: 'Demand', 'Supply' and 'Political Influence'," Carleton Economic Papers 04-04, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    14. Sanjit Dhami & Ali Al‐Nowaihi, 2010. "Existence of a Condorcet Winner When Voters Have Other‐Regarding Preferences," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 12(5), pages 897-922, October.
    15. Navin Kartik & SangMok Lee & Daniel Rappoport, 2022. "Single-Crossing Differences in Convex Environments," Papers 2212.12009, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    16. Francesco Passarelli, 2011. "Risky Political Changes: Rational Choice vs Prospect Theory," ISLA Working Papers 39, ISLA, Centre for research on Latin American Studies and Transition Economies, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    17. Kaivan Munshi & Mark Rosenzweig, 2008. "The Efficacy of Parochial Politics: Caste, Commitment, and Competence in Indian Local Governments," NBER Working Papers 14335, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Burkhard Schipper & Hee Yeul Woo, 2012. "Political Awareness and Microtargeting of Voters in Electoral Competition," Working Papers 124, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    19. Marco Faravelli & Randall Walsh, 2011. "Smooth Politicians And Paternalistic Voters: A Theory Of Large Elections," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000250, David K. Levine.
    20. Eric Kaufmann & Henry Patterson, 2006. "Intra‐Party Support for the Good Friday Agreement in the Ulster Unionist Party," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(3), pages 509-532, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2002_num_156_5_6886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.