IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pstr00/0000087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding hope and fulfillment in meaningful work: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of conservation and stewardship practitioners’ experience, values, and motivations

Author

Listed:
  • Alyssa R Soucy
  • Sandra De Urioste-Stone
  • Parinaz Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran
  • Jessica Jansujwicz
  • Karla Eitel
  • Matthew Brownlee

Abstract

Values and motivations can shape natural resource management decision-making as individuals set conservation goals based on diverse, unique backgrounds, histories, and experiences. Recent literature points to the need to understand, evaluate, and articulate practitioner values to make explicit how experiences shape their work. Our research responds to calls to explore a diverse range of values and motivations among conservation practitioners. We used a qualitative approach grounded in phenomenology to advance an in-depth understanding of how conservation and stewardship practitioners experience, acknowledge, and make sense of conservation decision-making in Maine, USA. We interviewed 21 conservation and stewardship practitioners. Our results indicate the presence of complex value systems, including strong biospheric, altruistic, eudaimonic, as well as egoistic values. These values interact and intersect with motivations for participants’ careers in conservation in unique ways, driving participant actions and decision-making. Within Maine specifically, our results highlight the many areas for convergence of broad values among seemingly diverse groups that can inform opportunities for collaboration. Participants expressed various pathways to careers in conservation, where their work enables them to make a meaningful contribution to the environment and society. However in situations where personal and organizational values are misaligned, the role of organizational transparency, employee empowerment, and agency are key. Our results have implications for conservation groups seeking to achieve high employee satisfaction, as well as researchers, policymakers, and practitioners who hope to inspire individuals to take on conservation careers to create sustainable and transformative action for the future. Fostering early experiences in place, including interactions with the non-human world and local community, are important for influencing and reinforcing values and motivations for conservation action.Author summary: We interviewed conservation and stewardship professionals in Maine, USA to understand the values and motivations for their work. Interview participants revealed diverse values and motivations grounded in early experiences in nature and among communities. This research responds to a call to understand the complex values and motivations of those that participate in pro-environmental actions. In understanding individual experiences around conservation decision-making and behaviors, we can illuminate opportunities for pathways into the field of conservation. Participants highlighted values related to concern for the environment, others, place and community, and their own personal fulfillment. Participants expressed motivations to protect local ecology, instill a conservation ethic in others, create a space for marginalized voices, and ensure long-term access to outdoor spaces. Our results indicate that participants are motivated to work in conservation as a way to align their personal values with their careers. We also found that early life experiences in nature and community can shape individuals and motivate them to go into the field of conservation where they can make meaningful change.

Suggested Citation

  • Alyssa R Soucy & Sandra De Urioste-Stone & Parinaz Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran & Jessica Jansujwicz & Karla Eitel & Matthew Brownlee, 2023. "Finding hope and fulfillment in meaningful work: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of conservation and stewardship practitioners’ experience, values, and motivations," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-25, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000087
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000087
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000087&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:sae:envval:v:26:y:2017:i:2:p:131-155 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Brett Bruyere & Silas Rappe, 2007. "Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 503-516.
    3. Mollie Painter & Sareh Pouryousefi & Sally Hibbert & Jo-Anna Russon, 2019. "Sharing Vocabularies: Towards Horizontal Alignment of Values-Driven Business Functions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 965-979, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyhne, Ivar & Aaen, Sara Bjørn & Nielsen, Helle & Kørnøv, Lone & Larsen, Sanne Vammen, 2018. "Citizens’ self-mobilization, motivational factors, and the group of most engaged citizens: The case of a radioactive waste repository in Denmark," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 433-442.
    2. Bahadur Ali Soomro & Ikhtiar Ali Ghumro & Naimatullah Shah, 2020. "Green entrepreneurship inclination among the younger generation: An avenue towards a green economy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 585-594, July.
    3. Joanna Sanecka & Stephan Barthel & Johan Colding, 2020. "Countryside within the City: A Motivating Vision behind Civic Green Area Stewardship in Warsaw, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Kim, Chung Hee & Amaeshi, Kenneth & Harris, Simon & Suh, Chang-Jin, 2013. "CSR and the national institutional context: The case of South Korea," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2581-2591.
    5. Lo, Ada S. & Lee, Candy Y.S., 2011. "Motivations and perceived value of volunteer tourists from Hong Kong," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 326-334.
    6. Paul R Armsworth & Lisette Cantú-Salazar & Mark Parnell & Josephine E Booth & Rob Stoneman & Zoe G Davies, 2013. "Opportunities for Cost-Sharing in Conservation: Variation in Volunteering Effort across Protected Areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, January.
    7. Angelina Ilievska & Naum Ilievski, 2020. "Priming Matrix - Collective Nonconscious Programming," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, ejms_v5_i.
    8. Jinhwan Kim & Hyeob Kim & HyukJun Kwon, 2020. "The Impact of Employees’ Perceptions of Strategic Alignment on Sustainability: An Empirical Investigation of Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Chen Ding & Michael A. Schuett, 2020. "Predicting the Commitment of Volunteers’ Environmental Stewardship: Does Generativity Play a Role?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Sari F. Madsen & Flemming Ekelund & Niels Strange & Jesper Sølver Schou, 2021. "Motivations of Volunteers in Danish Grazing Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Shehnaz Tehseen & Syed Arslan Haider, 2021. "Impact of Universities’ Partnerships on Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurship Intentions: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Mel Galbraith & Barbara Bollard-Breen & David R. Towns, 2016. "The Community-Conservation Conundrum: Is Citizen Science the Answer?," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Marisa R. Ferreira & Teresa Proença & João F. Proença, 2011. "An Empirical Analysis about Motivations among Hospital Volunteers," FEP Working Papers 418, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    14. Tomazos, Kostas & Butler, Richard, 2012. "Volunteer tourists in the field: A question of balance?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 177-187.
    15. Kuckertz, Andreas & Wagner, Marcus, 2010. "The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions -- Investigating the role of business experience," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 524-539, September.
    16. Brites, Alice Dantas & Morsello, Carla, 2018. "Effects of Economic Dependence and Cooperative Behavior Over Participation in Monitoring the Impacts of Natural Resource Trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 365-372.
    17. Hossein Vahidi & Mohammad Taleai & Wanglin Yan & Rajib Shaw, 2021. "Digital Citizen Science for Responding to COVID-19 Crisis: Experiences from Iran," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-34, September.
    18. Kyle M. Woosnam & Marianna Strzelecka & Gwendelyn S. Nisbett & Samuel J. Keith, 2019. "Examining Millennials’ Global Citizenship Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions to Engage in Environmental Volunteering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Valentine Seymour & Mike King & Roberta Antonaci, 2020. "Exploring those characteristics which may help to foster and support people’s social-ecological resilience: an environmental volunteering case study," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(4), pages 438-456, December.
    20. Kekezi, Ana, 2018. "Government’s deficiency of communication and the impact on stakeholder’s (Case of yellow waste WtE in Albania)," MPRA Paper 120250, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: sustaintransform (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.