IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345576.html

Mukara: A deep learning alternative to the four-step travel demand model with a case study on interurban highway traffic prediction in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Li
  • Shujuan Chen
  • Ying Jin

Abstract

Accurate traffic volume prediction is essential for managing congestion, improving road safety, mitigating environmental impacts, and supporting long-term transportation planning. The traditional four-step travel demand model (FSM) is a well-established framework, but it relies on static survey data, substantial calibration effort, and simplified behavioural assumptions that may not adequately capture complex travel patterns. In contrast, data-driven models are capable of learning nonlinear relationships from large datasets, yet they are often designed for short-term forecasting and typically do not target the long-term, segment-level volume estimation tasks required for strategic planning. This study proposes Mukara, a deep learning framework that directly approximates the mapping from external socioeconomic and network features to observed traffic volumes on highway trunk road segments. The model is trained on eight years of data from England and Wales and incorporates population, employment, land use, road network characteristics, and points of interest as inputs. Mukara achieves a mean GEH of 50.74, a mean absolute error of 8,989 vehicles per day, and an R2 of 0.583 under random cross-validation, outperforming baseline models and existing studies under comparable settings. Under a more stringent region-based spatial cross-validation scheme, performance remains robust, demonstrating strong spatial transferability. Ablation experiments further demonstrate the robustness of the proposed architecture and reveal the relative importance of different input feature groups for prediction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Li & Shujuan Chen & Ying Jin, 2026. "Mukara: A deep learning alternative to the four-step travel demand model with a case study on interurban highway traffic prediction in the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345576
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345576
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345576&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Athey, 2018. "The Impact of Machine Learning on Economics," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 507-547, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Ioannis Tikoudis & Andrea Papu Carrone & Rose Mba Mebiame & Nicolina Lamhauge & Katherine Hassett & Olof Bystrom, 2024. "Household transport choices: New empirical evidence and policy implications for sustainable behaviour," OECD Environment Working Papers 246, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2019. "Synthetic learner: model-free inference on treatments over time," Papers 1904.01490, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    2. Michael C. Knaus, 2021. "A double machine learning approach to estimate the effects of musical practice on student’s skills," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(1), pages 282-300, January.
    3. Yucheng Yang & Zhong Zheng & Weinan E, 2020. "Interpretable Neural Networks for Panel Data Analysis in Economics," Papers 2010.05311, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    4. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    5. Ajay Agrawal & Joshua Gans & Avi Goldfarb, 2019. "Economic Policy for Artificial Intelligence," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 139-159.
    6. Galdo, Virgilio & Li, Yue & Rama, Martin, 2021. "Identifying urban areas by combining human judgment and machine learning: An application to India," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Longbing Cao, 2021. "AI in Finance: Challenges, Techniques and Opportunities," Papers 2107.09051, arXiv.org.
    8. Castle, Jennifer L. & Doornik, Jurgen A. & Hendry, David F., 2021. "Modelling non-stationary ‘Big Data’," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1556-1575.
    9. Li, Jiyuan & Li, Zihui & Zhang, Min, 2023. "CFOs’ facial trustworthiness and bank loan contracts," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 332-357.
    10. Koffi Dumor & Li Yao, 2019. "Estimating China’s Trade with Its Partner Countries within the Belt and Road Initiative Using Neural Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Barkan, Oren & Benchimol, Jonathan & Caspi, Itamar & Cohen, Eliya & Hammer, Allon & Koenigstein, Noam, 2023. "Forecasting CPI inflation components with Hierarchical Recurrent Neural Networks," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 39(3), pages 1145-1162.
    12. Daniel Boller & Michael Lechner & Gabriel Okasa, 2025. "The effect of sport in online dating: evidence from causal machine learning," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Onder Ozgur & Erdal Tanas Karagol & Fatih Cemil Ozbugday, 2021. "Machine learning approach to drivers of bank lending: evidence from an emerging economy," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, December.
    14. Diop, Thierno Bocar & Védrine, Lionel, 2025. "Did crop diversity criterion from CAP green payments affect both economic and environmental farm performances? Quasi-experimental evidence from France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Maximilian Maurice Gail & Phil-Adrian Klotz, 2021. "The Impact of the Agency Model on E-book Prices: Evidence from the UK," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202111, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    16. Jau-er Chen & Chien-Hsun Huang & Jia-Jyun Tien, 2021. "Debiased/Double Machine Learning for Instrumental Variable Quantile Regressions," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, April.
    17. John Aoga & Juhee Bae & Stefanija Veljanoska & Siegfried Nijssen & Pierre Schaus, 2020. "Impact of weather factors on migration intention using machine learning algorithms," Papers 2012.02794, arXiv.org.
    18. Corral, Paul & Henderson, Heath & Segovia, Sandra, 2025. "Poverty mapping in the age of machine learning," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    19. Michael C Knaus & Michael Lechner & Anthony Strittmatter, 2021. "Machine learning estimation of heterogeneous causal effects: Empirical Monte Carlo evidence," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 24(1), pages 134-161.
    20. Xie, Wen-Jie & Li, Mu-Yao & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2021. "Learning representation of stock traders and immediate price impacts," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.