IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342445.html

Wealth, health, and happiness: An inverse story of the Easterlin Paradox in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yangjie Wang
  • Lianhua Li
  • Juan Huang
  • Hongjie Qiang

Abstract

One popular explanation for the Easterlin paradox is that income growth over time is usually accompanied by industrialization and pollution, which cause damage to happiness that cannot be reflected by income change. We examine this explanation by exploring the effects of a large-scale environmental regulation program -the “Two Control Zones (TCZ)” Policy- on subjective well-being (SWB) using data from a series of household surveys in China. We find that, the regulation has successfully mitigated air pollution in the implemented area, although at the cost of local income. Overall, the environmental effect dominates the income effect and TCZ policy increases the SWB of affected people. In particular, despite its negative effect on income, by controlling air pollution, the TCZ policy brought a net increase in residential happiness with a money value of ￥59.04 per month in terms of 2009 CNY. This finding supports the environmental explanation of the Easterlin paradox.

Suggested Citation

  • Yangjie Wang & Lianhua Li & Juan Huang & Hongjie Qiang, 2026. "Wealth, health, and happiness: An inverse story of the Easterlin Paradox in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342445
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342445
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342445&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.