IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The nonlinear impact of ESG performance on audit pricing: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yajin Li
  • Fei Meng

Abstract

The substantial impact of corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance, predominantly measured by non-financial metrics, on external auditors is investigated in this paper. Using a sample of Chinese-listed companies from 2011 to 2021, we examine how auditors respond to corporate ESG performance from the perspective of audit pricing. The findings reveal a U-shaped, non-linear relationship between corporate ESG performance and audit pricing. Enhancing ESG performance significantly reduces audit pricing up to a certain threshold, but the impact diminishes as performance continues to improve. Internal control quality and the degree of information asymmetry play pivotal moderating roles within this U-shaped relationship; higher-quality internal controls and lower information asymmetry contribute to flattening the U-shaped curve. Mechanism analysis illustrates that ESG performance influences audit pricing by mitigating financial and operational risks. This paper supplements the understanding of ESG’s impact on audit pricing from a non-linear perspective, offering valuable insights for companies actively engaged in ESG practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Yajin Li & Fei Meng, 2025. "The nonlinear impact of ESG performance on audit pricing: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331504
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331504
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331504&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hollis Ashbaugh‐Skaife & Daniel W. Collins & William R. Kinney Jr & Ryan Lafond, 2009. "The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(1), pages 1-43, March.
    2. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2013_013 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Pastor, Lubos & Stambaugh, Robert F., 2003. "Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(3), pages 642-685, June.
    4. Leventis, Stergios & Hasan, Iftekhar & Dedoulis, Emmanouil, 2013. "The cost of sin: The effect of social norms on audit pricing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 152-165.
    5. Doyle, Jeffrey & Ge, Weili & McVay, Sarah, 2007. "Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 193-223, September.
    6. Fu, Changluan & Yu, Chenyang & Guo, Mengting & Zhang, Lin, 2024. "ESG rating and financial risk of mining industry companies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Ping Wei & Xiaodan Mao & Xiaohong Chen, 2020. "Institutional investors' attention to environmental information, trading strategies, and market impacts: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 566-591, February.
    8. Zerbib, Olivier David, 2019. "The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 39-60.
    9. Anwer, Zaheer & Goodell, John W. & Migliavacca, Milena & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2023. "Does ESG impact systemic risk? Evidencing an inverted U-shape relationship for major energy firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 10-25.
    10. Rajib Doogar & Stephen P. Rowe & Padmakumar Sivadasan, 2015. "Asleep at the Wheel (Again)? Bank Audits During the Lead†Up to the Financial Crisis," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 358-391, March.
    11. Leventis, Stergios & Hasan, Iftekhar & Dedoulis, Emmanouil, 2013. "The cost of sin: The effect of social norms on audit pricing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 152-165.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baolei Qi & Liuchuang Li & Qing Zhou & Jinghui Sun, 2017. "Does internal control over financial reporting really alleviate agency conflicts?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(4), pages 1101-1125, December.
    2. Chung, Chune Young & Thi Ngoc Dung, Pham & Liu, Chang, 2024. "Institutional blockholder monitoring and stock price crash risk," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Samir El-Gazzar & Kwang-Hyun Chung & Rudolph Jacob, 2011. "Reporting of Internal Control Weaknesses and Debt Rating Changes," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 17(4), pages 421-435, November.
    4. Elsayed, Mohamed & Elshandidy, Tamer, 2021. "Internal control effectiveness, textual risk disclosure, and their usefulness: U.S. evidence," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2021. "Sustainable investing in equilibrium," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 550-571.
    6. Joost Impink & Martien Lubberink & Bart Praag & David Veenman, 2012. "Did accelerated filing requirements and SOX Section 404 affect the timeliness of 10-K filings?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 227-253, June.
    7. Zhu, Jiajun & Hu, Xuetong & Gao, Jing & Tan, Hongping, 2024. "Internal control risk disclosure, media coverage and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    8. Fang-Nan Liao & Xiao-Li Ji & Zhi-Ping Wang, 2019. "Firms’ Sustainability: Does Economic Policy Uncertainty Affect Internal Control?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Murad Harasheh & Roberta Provasi, 2023. "A need for assurance: Do internal control systems integrate environmental, social, and governance factors?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 384-401, January.
    10. Feng, Yuan & Mao, Yihuan & Cai, Jing & Xu, Nan, 2024. "Can board IT expertise improve corporate internal control?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    11. Ranjan D’Mello & Xinghua Gao & Yonghong Jia, 2017. "Internal control and internal capital allocation: evidence from internal capital markets of multi-segment firms," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 251-287, March.
    12. Gerrit Sarens & Giuseppe D’Onza, 2017. "The perception of financial analysts on risk, risk management, and internal control disclosure: Evidence from Belgium and Italy," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 118-138, May.
    13. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2022. "Dissecting green returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 403-424.
    14. Hong, Jifeng & Kazakis, Pantelis & Strieborny, Martin, 2024. "Green Bond Issuance by Firms, External Monitoring, and Probability of Default: An Empirical Research Based on Green Policies," MPRA Paper 123049, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Dunli Zhang & Ting Zhang & Guanghua Ma, 2020. "Can non‐executive equity incentives reduce internal control ineffectiveness? Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(5), pages 4467-4496, December.
    16. Wang, Ren & Bian, Yuxiang & Xiong, Xiong, 2024. "Impact of ESG preferences on investments and emissions in a DSGE framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Cheng, Mei & Dhaliwal, Dan & Zhang, Yuan, 2013. "Does investment efficiency improve after the disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 1-18.
    18. Nishizaki, Riku & Takano, Yudai & Takeda, Fumiko, 2014. "Information Content of Internal Control Weaknesses: The Evidence from Japan," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-26.
    19. Ge, Weili & Koester, Allison & McVay, Sarah, 2017. "Benefits and costs of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b) exemption: Evidence from small firms’ internal control disclosures," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 358-384.
    20. Stoel, M. Dale & Muhanna, Waleed A., 2011. "IT internal control weaknesses and firm performance: An organizational liability lens," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 280-304.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.