IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0328463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with weighing a child at birth: Evidence from 16 sub-Saharan African countries

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Bawuah
  • Samuel Ampaw
  • Edward Nketiah-Amponsah

Abstract

Background: Several children from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are not weighed at birth. The lack of birthweight data is a significant challenge in monitoring the global prevalence of extreme birthweight, either low or high, and newborn health. This data guides resource allocation and the design of targeted health policies to address neonatal complications and mortalities. This paper explores the demand-side predictors of newborn weighing. Methods: Data were obtained from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) of 16 countries in SSA, conducted from 2014 to 2021. Multivariate logistic regression was used to achieve the study’s objectives. Results: Approximately 59% of the study population were weighed at birth. This prevalence rate varied widely across the 16 countries, ranging from 23% in Chad to 94% in Gabon. The study documents a positive association between higher socioeconomic status and the probability of being weighed at birth. Specifically, older women and women with higher education and wealth were more likely to weigh their newborns at birth. Also, women who delivered at healthcare facilities and those who used antenatal care had a higher likelihood of weighing their children at birth. Urban residents were more likely to weigh their children at birth. On the contrary, the likelihood of weighing a child at birth decreases with parity. Conclusion: The study highlights the need to target pregnant women of lower socioeconomic status for interventions aimed at averting severe morbidity and mortality occasioned by conditions of low birthweight.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Bawuah & Samuel Ampaw & Edward Nketiah-Amponsah, 2025. "Factors associated with weighing a child at birth: Evidence from 16 sub-Saharan African countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328463
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328463
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0328463&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0328463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0328463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.