IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Household cost of accessing contraceptive services among women in Urban communities in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Caesar Kaba Kogoziga
  • Desmond Dzidzornu Otoo
  • Raphael Kwasi Gborgbortsi
  • Richmond Owusu
  • Serwaa Akoto Bawua

Abstract

Background: In many developing nations, including Ghana, access to contraceptive services, remains a critical concern where urban areas face unique challenges in healthcare delivery. Despite various interventions, the financial burden of assessing these contraceptive services continues to hinder adoption by women especially those with economic challenges. This study explored the costs incurred by women seeking contraceptive services in urban communities by estimating the direct, indirect, and intangible costs in Ghana. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted using the patient perspective; to gather data on direct medical and non-medical costs, indirect costs and intangible costs that were associated with women seeking contraceptive services. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from three Planned Parenthood Association of Ghana (PPAG) facilities in the Accra metropolitan, Suame municipal and Sagnarigu districts in the Greater Accra, Ashanti, and Northern Regions respectively. A total of 125 women accessing contraceptive services were randomly selected and included in the study. Data was analyzed descriptively and reported in frequency tables, pie, and bar charts. All costs were reported in Ghana Cedi and US dollar. Results: The average direct cost of contraceptive services was GHS 18.37 ± 22.11 (US$ 1.53 ± 1.84) per visit. This comprised an average direct medical cost of GHS 8.50 ± 7.18 (US$ 0.71 ± 0.60) and non-medical cost of GHS 9.84 ± 20.23 (US$ 0.82 ± 1.69). Clients, on average, lost 52.1 minutes due to traveling and waiting, resulting in an average productivity loss of GHS 1.62 per visit. The average economic cost of contraceptive service was GHS 19.99 (US$ 1.67) per patient. About 92% of the economic cost was made up of direct cost. 71.2% of respondents consulted their partners before accessing contraceptive services, and 94% believed that their decision to use contraceptives did not negatively affect their relationships, however, many reported pains during the procedure. Conclusion: The study highlights the considerable direct and indirect costs associated with accessing modern contraceptive services, indicating a potential barrier to access when compared to daily minimum wage and prevailing economic conditions. Addressing these economic challenges is crucial for ensuring access to contraceptive services. Innovative strategies such as service delivery outreaches and deployment of digital health interventions to expand self-care is recommended to help reduce travel time to and from the service delivery point for contraceptive services.

Suggested Citation

  • Caesar Kaba Kogoziga & Desmond Dzidzornu Otoo & Raphael Kwasi Gborgbortsi & Richmond Owusu & Serwaa Akoto Bawua, 2025. "Household cost of accessing contraceptive services among women in Urban communities in Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325882
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325882
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325882&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. United Nations UN, 2015. "The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015," Working Papers id:7097, eSocialSciences.
    2. United Nations UN, 2015. "The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015," Working Papers id:7222, eSocialSciences.
    3. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jussi T. S. Heikkila, 2020. "Classifying economics for the common good: Connecting sustainable development goals to JEL codes," Papers 2004.04384, arXiv.org.
    2. Donatella Saccone, 2021. "Can the Covid19 pandemic affect the achievement of the ‘Zero Hunger’ goal? Some preliminary reflections," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(7), pages 1025-1038, September.
    3. Ali, Murad, 2017. "Implementing the 2030 Agenda in Pakistan: the critical role of an enabling environment in the mobilisation of domestic and external resources," IDOS Discussion Papers 14/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. MacFeely Steve, 2017. "Measuring the Sustainable Development Goals: What does it mean for Ireland?," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 65(4), pages 41-71, December.
    5. Kedir Y. Ahmed & Allen G. Ross & Seada M. Hussien & Kingsley E. Agho & Bolajoko O. Olusanya & Felix Akpojene Ogbo, 2023. "Mapping Local Variations and the Determinants of Childhood Stunting in Nigeria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Cuenca-García, Eduardo & Sánchez, Angeles & Navarro-Pabsdorf, Margarita, 2019. "Assessing the performance of the least developed countries in terms of the Millennium Development Goals," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 54-66.
    7. Debapriya Bhattacharya & Lumbini Barua & Shusmita Islam, 2018. "Exploring The State of Youth in the SDG Context: How is Bangladesh Doing?," CPD Working Paper 119, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
    8. Alvaro Mendez & David Patrick Houghton, 2020. "Sustainable Banking: The Role of Multilateral Development Banks as Norm Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Mason-D'Croz, Daniel & Sulser, Timothy B. & Wiebe, Keith & Rosegrant, Mark W. & Lowder, Sarah K. & Nin-Pratt, Alejandro & Willenbockel, Dirk & Robinson, Sherman & Zhu, Tingju & Cenacchi, Nicola & Duns, 2019. "Agricultural investments and hunger in Africa modeling potential contributions to SDG2 – Zero Hunger," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 38-53.
    10. Klarin Tomislav, 2018. "The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 21(1), pages 67-94, May.
    11. Joshua Amo-Adjei & Kofi Aduo-Adjei & Christiana Opoku-Nyamah & Chimaroake Izugbara, 2018. "Analysis of socioeconomic differences in the quality of antenatal services in low and middle-income countries (LMICs)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
    12. Abreha, Solomon K. & Walelign, Solomon Z. & Zereyesus, Yacob A., 2020. "Associations between Women’s Empowerment and Child Health Status in Ethiopia," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304174, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Paul H. McClelland & Claire T. Kenney & Federico Palacardo & Nicholas L. S. Roberts & Nicholas Luhende & Jason Chua & Jennifer Huang & Priyanka Patel & Leonardo Albertini Sanchez & Won J. Kim & John K, 2022. "Improved Water and Waste Management Practices Reduce Diarrhea Risk in Children under Age Five in Rural Tanzania: A Community-Based, Cross-Sectional Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Jigyasa Sharma & Hannah H Leslie & Francis Kundu & Margaret E Kruk, 2017. "Poor Quality for Poor Women? Inequities in the Quality of Antenatal and Delivery Care in Kenya," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Bruno Boidin, 2020. "The social determinants of health in Africa from a political economy perspective: an exploratory contribution," Working Papers hal-02555436, HAL.
    16. Rashidul Alam Mahumud & Khorshed Alam & Andre M N Renzaho & Abdur Razzaque Sarker & Marufa Sultana & Nurnabi Sheikh & Lal B Rawal & Jeff Gow, 2019. "Changes in inequality of childhood morbidity in Bangladesh 1993-2014: A decomposition analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Maria Rosa Trovato & Cheren Cappello, 2022. "Climate Adaptation Heuristic Planning Support System (HPSS): Green-Blue Strategies to Support the Ecological Transition of Historic Centres," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-40, May.
    18. M Mamun Huda & Jocelyn E Finlay & Martin O’Flaherty & Abdullah Al Mamun, 2022. "Transition in social risk factors and adolescent motherhood in low- income and middle- income countries: Evidence from Demographic and Health Survey data, 1996–2018," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(5), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Mario La Torre & Helen Chiappini (ed.), 2020. "Contemporary Issues in Sustainable Finance," Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-030-40248-8, June.
    20. Alicea Skye Garcia & Thomas Wanner, 2017. "Gender inequality and food security: lessons from the gender-responsive work of the International Food Policy Research Institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(5), pages 1091-1103, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.