IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0312573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of ANN and XGBoost surrogate models trained on small numbers of building energy simulations

Author

Listed:
  • Sanja Stevanović
  • Husain Dashti
  • Marko Milošević
  • Salem Al-Yakoob
  • Dragan Stevanović

Abstract

Surrogate optimisation holds a big promise for building energy optimisation studies due to its goal to replace the use of lengthy building energy simulations within an optimisation step with expendable local surrogate models that can quickly predict simulation results. To be useful for such purpose, it should be possible to quickly train precise surrogate models from a small number of simulation results (10–100) obtained from appropriately sampled points in the desired part of the design space. Two sampling methods and two machine learning models are compared here. Latin hypercube sampling (LHS), widely accepted in building energy community, is compared to an exploratory Monte Carlo-based sequential design method mc-intersite-proj-th (MIPT). Artificial neural networks (ANN), also widely accepted in building energy community, are compared to gradient-boosted tree ensembles (XGBoost), model of choice in many machine learning competitions. In order to get a better understanding of the behaviour of these two sampling methods and two machine learning models, we compare their predictions against a large set of generated synthetic data. For this purpose, a simple case study of an office cell model with a single window and a fixed overhang, whose main input parameters are overhang depth and height, while climate type, presence of obstacles, orientation and heating and cooling set points are additional input parameters, was extensively simulated with EnergyPlus, to form a large underlying dataset of 729,000 simulation results. Expendable local surrogate models for predicting simulated heating, cooling and lighting loads and equivalent primary energy needs of the office cell were trained using both LHS and MIPT and both ANN and XGBoost for several main hyperparameter choices. Results show that XGBoost models are more precise than ANN models, and that for both machine learning models, the use of MIPT sampling leads to more precise surrogates than LHS.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanja Stevanović & Husain Dashti & Marko Milošević & Salem Al-Yakoob & Dragan Stevanović, 2024. "Comparison of ANN and XGBoost surrogate models trained on small numbers of building energy simulations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312573
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312573
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312573&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0312573?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan, Cheng & Xiao, Fu & Zhao, Yang, 2017. "A short-term building cooling load prediction method using deep learning algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 222-233.
    2. Crombecq, K. & Laermans, E. & Dhaene, T., 2011. "Efficient space-filling and non-collapsing sequential design strategies for simulation-based modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 683-696, November.
    3. Sanja Stevanović & Dragan Stevanović & Matthias Dehmer, 2019. "On optimal and near-optimal shapes of external shading of windows in apartment buildings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Wang, Zeyu & Srinivasan, Ravi S., 2017. "A review of artificial intelligence based building energy use prediction: Contrasting the capabilities of single and ensemble prediction models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 796-808.
    5. Sanja Stevanović & Dragan Stevanović, 2018. "Optimisation of curvilinear external shading of windows in cellular offices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gautham Krishnadas & Aristides Kiprakis, 2020. "A Machine Learning Pipeline for Demand Response Capacity Scheduling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Wang, Ran & Lu, Shilei & Feng, Wei, 2020. "A novel improved model for building energy consumption prediction based on model integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    3. Jason Runge & Radu Zmeureanu, 2021. "A Review of Deep Learning Techniques for Forecasting Energy Use in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, January.
    4. Li, Xinyi & Yao, Runming, 2020. "A machine-learning-based approach to predict residential annual space heating and cooling loads considering occupant behaviour," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    5. Zhang, Xiaofeng & Kong, Xiaoying & Yan, Renshi & Liu, Yuting & Xia, Peng & Sun, Xiaoqin & Zeng, Rong & Li, Hongqiang, 2023. "Data-driven cooling, heating and electrical load prediction for building integrated with electric vehicles considering occupant travel behavior," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Li, Tao & Liu, Xiangyu & Li, Guannan & Wang, Xing & Ma, Jiangqiaoyu & Xu, Chengliang & Mao, Qianjun, 2024. "A systematic review and comprehensive analysis of building occupancy prediction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Jason Runge & Radu Zmeureanu, 2019. "Forecasting Energy Use in Buildings Using Artificial Neural Networks: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Fan, Cheng & Sun, Yongjun & Xiao, Fu & Ma, Jie & Lee, Dasheng & Wang, Jiayuan & Tseng, Yen Chieh, 2020. "Statistical investigations of transfer learning-based methodology for short-term building energy predictions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Li, Guannan & Wu, Yubei & Yoon, Sungmin & Fang, Xi, 2024. "Comprehensive transferability assessment of short-term cross-building-energy prediction using deep adversarial network transfer learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    10. Fathi, Soheil & Srinivasan, Ravi & Fenner, Andriel & Fathi, Sahand, 2020. "Machine learning applications in urban building energy performance forecasting: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Ping Wang & Guangcai Gong & Yan Zhou & Bin Qin, 2018. "A Simplified Calculation Method for Building Envelope Cooling Loads in Central South China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Wang, Zeyu & Liu, Jian & Zhang, Yuanxin & Yuan, Hongping & Zhang, Ruixue & Srinivasan, Ravi S., 2021. "Practical issues in implementing machine-learning models for building energy efficiency: Moving beyond obstacles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    13. Fan, Cheng & Xiao, Fu & Song, Mengjie & Wang, Jiayuan, 2019. "A graph mining-based methodology for discovering and visualizing high-level knowledge for building energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Shen, Yuxuan & Pan, Yue, 2023. "BIM-supported automatic energy performance analysis for green building design using explainable machine learning and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    15. World Bank Group, 2024. "Poland Country Climate and Development Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 42286, The World Bank Group.
    16. Solène Goy & François Maréchal & Donal Finn, 2020. "Data for Urban Scale Building Energy Modelling: Assessing Impacts and Overcoming Availability Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    17. Lu, Yakai & Tian, Zhe & Zhou, Ruoyu & Liu, Wenjing, 2021. "A general transfer learning-based framework for thermal load prediction in regional energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    18. Tomasz Szul & Krzysztof Nęcka & Stanisław Lis, 2021. "Application of the Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Modeling to Forecast Energy Efficiency in Real Buildings Undergoing Thermal Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Sachin Kumar & Zairu Nisha & Jagvinder Singh & Anuj Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Sensor network driven novel hybrid model based on feature selection and SVR to predict indoor temperature for energy consumption optimisation in smart buildings," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(6), pages 3048-3061, December.
    20. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Tran, Duc-Son, 2018. "Forecasting energy consumption time series using machine learning techniques based on usage patterns of residential householders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 709-726.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.