IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can agricultural technological progress promote China’s interprovincial rural revitalization? an analytical perspective based on agricultural-scale operations

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Wang
  • Dong Xue
  • Zheyi Yang

Abstract

To clarify the role of agricultural technological progress in the process of rural revitalization, this paper uses the agricultural panel data of 31 provinces in China from 2007 to 2020 to measure the Total Factor Productivity of agriculture, analyzes the impact direction and spatial spillover effect of agricultural technological progress on China’s rural revitalization through the spatial Durbin model, and analyzes the threshold mechanism of agricultural technological progress on China’s rural revitalization by using the panel threshold model. The results are as follows: (1) The spatial and geographical agglomeration of interprovincial rural revitalization in China has gradually weakened, and the regional imbalance has improved; (2) The progress in agricultural technology plays a positive role in promoting China’s interprovincial rural revitalization, and the overall nonlinear characteristics of "first inhibiting and then promoting" are presented, and the conclusion is still robust after fully considering the factors of time, region and economic distance; (3) Further analysis shows that the impact of agricultural technological progress on China’s interprovincial rural revitalization is based on the threshold constraints of land-scale operation and agricultural-industry agglomeration, and shows significant spatial heterogeneity. The inherent reason is that whether the land-scale operation entity adopts long-term investment decisions such as new agricultural technology depends on the expectation of land management risk stability, while agricultural-industry agglomeration hinders the diffusion and spillover of agricultural technology due to the exclusive characteristics of agricultural production geographical locations. Therefore, in the future of China’s rural revitalization, the government should guide the large-scale operation of land and agricultural production according to local conditions to give full play to the positive spillover effect and spatial radiation capacity of agricultural technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Wang & Dong Xue & Zheyi Yang, 2024. "Can agricultural technological progress promote China’s interprovincial rural revitalization? an analytical perspective based on agricultural-scale operations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-30, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309339
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309339
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309339&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tientao, A. & Legros, D. & Pichery, M.C., 2016. "Technology spillover and TFP growth: A spatial Durbin model," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 21-31.
    2. Siyu Yang & Feng Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Agricultural Machinery Socialization Services on the Scale of Land Operation: Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Luc Anselin, 2001. "Spatial Effects in Econometric Practice in Environmental and Resource Economics," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(3), pages 705-710.
    4. Shulong Li & Zhizhang Wang, 2023. "The Effects of Agricultural Technology Progress on Agricultural Carbon Emission and Carbon Sink in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, March.
    5. YANG,Jinrong & CAO,Linlin & YANG,Zisheng, 2023. "Relationship between Rural Industry Revitalization and Land Resource Utilization and Its Practice in Ganning Town, Wanzhou District of Chongqing," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 15(08), August.
    6. Boubaker Dhehibi & Udo Rudiger & Hloniphani Peter Moyo & Mohamed Zied Dhraief, 2020. "Agricultural Technology Transfer Preferences of Smallholder Farmers in Tunisia’s Arid Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Xu Dong & Yali Yang & Xiaomeng Zhao & Yingjie Feng & Chenguang Liu, 2021. "Environmental Regulation, Resource Misallocation and Industrial Total Factor Productivity: A Spatial Empirical Study Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Shipeng Yang & Wanxiang Xu & Yuxuan Xie & Muhammad Tayyab Sohail & Yefang Gong, 2023. "Impact of Natural Hazards on Agricultural Production Decision Making of Peasant Households: On the Basis of the Micro Survey Data of Hunan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Aligui Tientao & Diego Legros & Marie Claude Pichery, 2016. "Technology spillover and TFP growth: A spatial Durbin model," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 145, pages 21-31.
    10. Dayong Huang & Yangyang Zhu & Qiuyue Yu, 2022. "Spatial Spillover Effects of Agricultural Agglomeration on Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in the Yangtze River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Liu, Yazhou & Ji, Yueqing & Shao, Shuai & Zhong, Funing & Zhang, Ning & Chen, Yishan, 2017. "Scale of Production, Agglomeration and Agricultural Pollutant Treatment: Evidence From a Survey in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 30-45.
    12. Caifeng Tan & Jianping Tao & Lan Yi & Juan He & Qi Huang, 2022. "Dynamic Relationship between Agricultural Technology Progress, Agricultural Insurance and Farmers’ Income," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Yingji Liu & Manchao Zhang & Qun Cao & Erhong Wang & Bingkun Zou, 2023. "Can Integration of Agriculture and Tourism Promote Rural Green Development?—Empirical Evidence from 152 Cities in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Li Wang & Jinyang Tang & Mengqian Tang & Mengying Su & Lili Guo, 2022. "Scale of Operation, Financial Support, and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Cheng & Yao, Yangyang & Zhou, Han, 2023. "External technology dependence and manufacturing TFP: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Wu, Haitao, 2022. "The role of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on green total factor energy efficiency: Does institutional quality matters? Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Pan, Zixuan & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Song, Malin, 2020. "Directed technological progress driven by diversified industrial structural change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 112-129.
    4. Xiayire Xiaokaiti & Hongli Zhang & Nan Jia, 2024. "The Impacts and Spatial Characteristics of High-Standard Farmland Construction on Agricultural Carbon Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Zumian Xiao & Hongfeng Peng & Zheyao Pan, 2022. "Innovation, external technological environment and the total factor productivity of enterprises," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 3-29, March.
    6. Xiao Xiang & Qiao Fan, 2024. "Advancing Green TFP Calculation: A Novel Spatiotemporal Econometric Solow Residual Method and Its Application to China’s Urban Industrial Sectors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-33, April.
    7. Myovella, Godwin & Karacuka, Mehmet & Haucap, Justus, 2021. "Determinants of digitalization and digital divide in Sub-Saharan African economies: A spatial Durbin analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10).
    8. Yuan, Lingran & Zhang, Qizheng & Wang, Shuo & Hu, Weibin & Gong, Binlei, 2022. "Effects of international trade on world agricultural production and productivity: evidence from a panel of 126 countries 1962-2014," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(2), March.
    9. Jiangyuan Fu & Huidan Xue & Fayuan Wang & Liming Wang, 2023. "The Impact of High-Quality Energy Development and Technological Innovation on the Real Economy of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China: A Spatial Economic and Threshold Effect Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Huang, Junbing & Cai, Xiaochen & Huang, Shuo & Tian, Sen & Lei, Hongyan, 2019. "Technological factors and total factor productivity in China: Evidence based on a panel threshold model," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 271-285.
    11. De Siano, Rita & Sapio, Alessandro, 2022. "Spatial merit order effects of renewables in the Italian power exchange," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Zhai, Xueqi & An, Yunfei, 2021. "The relationship between technological innovation and green transformation efficiency in China: An empirical analysis using spatial panel data," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Zhang, Yonggang & Dilanchiev, Azer, 2022. "Economic recovery, industrial structure and natural resource utilization efficiency in China: Effect on green economic recovery," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Wei Wei & Qiao Fan & Aijun Guo, 2022. "China’s Industrial TFPs at the Prefectural Level and the Law of Their Spatial–Temporal Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Zhou, Guangyou & Zhu, Jieyu & Luo, Sumei, 2022. "The impact of fintech innovation on green growth in China: Mediating effect of green finance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Kai Zhao, 2021. "Competition of International Trade, Technology Spillover, and R&D Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 676-694, June.
    17. Peter Mulder & Raymond J.G.M. Florax & Henri L.F. de Groot, 2011. "A Spatial Perspective on Global Energy Productivity Trends," Chapters, in: Raymond J.G.M. Florax & Henri L.F. de Groot & Peter Mulder (ed.), Improving Energy Efficiency through Technology, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Qing Zhao & Chih-Hung Yuan, 2020. "Did Haze Pollution Harm the Quality of Economic Development?—An Empirical Study Based on China’s PM2.5 Concentrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Scotti, Francesco & Flori, Andrea & Pammolli, Fabio, 2022. "The economic impact of structural and Cohesion Funds across sectors: Immediate, medium-to-long term effects and spillovers," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    20. Jingbin Wang & Huiling Qiao & Jing Liu & Bo Li, 2022. "Does the Establishment of National New Areas Improve Urban Ecological Efficiency? Empirical Evidence Based on Staggered DID Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.