IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0299546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of cooperator recognition on competition among clones in spatially structured microbial communities

Author

Listed:
  • Adrienna Bingham
  • Aparajita Sur
  • Leah B Shaw
  • Helen A Murphy

Abstract

In spatially structured microbial communities, clonal growth of stationary cells passively generates clusters of related individuals. This can lead to stable cooperation without the need for recognition mechanisms. However, recent research suggests that some biofilm-forming microbes may have mechanisms of kin recognition. To explore this unexpected observation, we studied the effects of different types of cooperation in a microbial colony using spatially explicit, agent-based simulations of two interacting strains. We found scenarios that favor a form of kin recognition in spatially structured microbial communities. In the presence of a “cheater” strain, a strain with greenbeard cooperation was able to increase in frequency more than a strain with obligate cooperation. This effect was most noticeable in high density colonies and when the cooperators were not as abundant as the cheaters. We also studied whether a polychromatic greenbeard, in which cells only cooperate with their own type, could provide a numerical benefit beyond a simple, binary greenbeard. We found the greatest benefit to a polychromatic greenbeard when cooperation is highly effective. These results suggest that in some ecological scenarios, recognition mechanisms may be beneficial even in spatially structured communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrienna Bingham & Aparajita Sur & Leah B Shaw & Helen A Murphy, 2024. "The effect of cooperator recognition on competition among clones in spatially structured microbial communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0299546
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0299546
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0299546&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0299546?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen P. Diggle & Ashleigh S. Griffin & Genevieve S. Campbell & Stuart A. West, 2007. "Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7168), pages 411-414, November.
    2. Joan E. Strassmann & Yong Zhu & David C. Queller, 2000. "Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6815), pages 965-967, December.
    3. Gregory J. Velicer & Lee Kroos & Richard E. Lenski, 2000. "Developmental cheating in the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6778), pages 598-601, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peña, Jorge & Cooper, Guy Alexander & Liu, Ming & West, Stuart Andrew, 2020. "Dividing labour in social microorganisms: coordinated or random specialisation?," IAST Working Papers 20-104, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    2. repec:plo:pcbi00:1008617 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kerry E Boyle & Hilary Monaco & Dave van Ditmarsch & Maxime Deforet & Joao B Xavier, 2015. "Integration of Metabolic and Quorum Sensing Signals Governing the Decision to Cooperate in a Bacterial Social Trait," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Anne Mund & Christina Kuttler & Judith Pérez-Velázquez, 2019. "Using G -Functions to Investigate the Evolutionary Stability of Bacterial Quorum Sensing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Jordan, Felix & Hutzenthaler, Martin & Metzler, Dirk, 2025. "Selection for altruistic defense in structured populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 13-24.
    6. Dimitris Iliopoulos & Arend Hintze & Christoph Adami, 2010. "Critical Dynamics in the Evolution of Stochastic Strategies for the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-8, October.
    7. Bryan K Lynn & Patrick De Leenheer & Martin Schuster, 2024. "Putting theory to the test: An integrated computational/experimental chemostat model of the tragedy of the commons," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-29, April.
    8. Lieven Demeester & Knut Eichler & Christoph H. Loch, 2004. "Organic Production Systems: What the Biological Cell Can Teach Us About Manufacturing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 115-132, April.
    9. Fernando W Rossine & Ricardo Martinez-Garcia & Allyson E Sgro & Thomas Gregor & Corina E Tarnita, 2020. "Eco-evolutionary significance of “loners”," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-27, March.
    10. Bryan L. Gitschlag & Claudia V. Pereira & James P. Held & David M. McCandlish & Maulik R. Patel, 2024. "Multiple distinct evolutionary mechanisms govern the dynamics of selfish mitochondrial genomes in Caenorhabditis elegans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Jorge M Pacheco & Vítor V Vasconcelos & Francisco C Santos & Brian Skyrms, 2015. "Co-evolutionary Dynamics of Collective Action with Signaling for a Quorum," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, February.
    12. Eran Even-Tov & Shira Omer Bendori & Julie Valastyan & Xiaobo Ke & Shaul Pollak & Tasneem Bareia & Ishay Ben-Zion & Bonnie L Bassler & Avigdor Eldar, 2016. "Social Evolution Selects for Redundancy in Bacterial Quorum Sensing," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Van Cleve, Jeremy, 2015. "Social evolution and genetic interactions in the short and long term," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 2-26.
    14. Young, Glenn & Belmonte, Andrew, 2018. "Fast cheater migration stabilizes coexistence in a public goods dilemma on networks," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 12-25.
    15. repec:plo:pcbi00:1004848 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Li, Yixiao & Shen, Bin, 2013. "The coevolution of partner switching and strategy updating in non-excludable public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(20), pages 4956-4965.
    17. Elhanati, Yuval & Schuster, Stefan & Brenner, Naama, 2011. "Dynamic modeling of cooperative protein secretion in microorganism populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 49-63.
    18. Mariko Katoh-Kurasawa & Peter Lehmann & Gad Shaulsky, 2024. "The greenbeard gene tgrB1 regulates altruism and cheating in Dictyostelium discoideum," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Martin Schuster & Eric Foxall & David Finch & Hal Smith & Patrick De Leenheer, 2017. "Tragedy of the commons in the chemostat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0299546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.