IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0292370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Future workspace needs flexibility and diversity: A machine learning-driven behavioural analysis of co-working space

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayu Pan
  • Tze Yeung Cho
  • Maoran Sun
  • Ramit Debnath
  • Nathan Lonsdale
  • Chris Wilcox
  • Ronita Bardhan

Abstract

The future of workspace is significantly shaped by the advancements in technologies, changes in work patterns and workers’ desire for an improved well-being. Co-working space is an alternative workspace solution, for cost-effectiveness, the opportunity for diverse and flexible design and multi-use. This study examined the human-centric design choices using spatial and temporal variation of occupancy levels and user behaviour in a flexible co-working space in London. Through a machine-learning-driven analysis, we investigated the time-dependent patterns, decompose space usage, calculate seat utilisation and identify spatial hotspots. The analysis incorporated a large dataset of sensor-detected occupancy data spanning 477 days, comprising more than 140 million (145×106) data points. Additionally, on-site observations of activities were recorded for 13 days spanning over a year, with 110 time instances including more than 1000 snapshots of occupants’ activities, indoor environment, working behaviour and preferences. Results showed that the shared working areas positioned near windows or in more open, connected and visible locations are significantly preferred and utilised for communication and working, and semi-enclosed space on the side with less visibility and higher privacy are preferred for focused working. The flexibility of multi-use opportunity was the most preferred feature for hybrid working. The findings offer data-driven insights for human-centric space planning and design of office spaces in the future, particularly in the context of hybrid working setups, hot-desking and co-working systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayu Pan & Tze Yeung Cho & Maoran Sun & Ramit Debnath & Nathan Lonsdale & Chris Wilcox & Ronita Bardhan, 2023. "Future workspace needs flexibility and diversity: A machine learning-driven behavioural analysis of co-working space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292370
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292370
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292370&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0292370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pebesma, Edzer, 2012. "spacetime: Spatio-Temporal Data in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 51(i07).
    2. Lynne J. Millward & S. Alexander Haslam & Tom Postmes, 2007. "Putting Employees in Their Place: The Impact of Hot Desking on Organizational and Team Identification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 547-559, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bakar, Khandoker Shuvo & Sahu, Sujit K., 2015. "spTimer: Spatio-Temporal Bayesian Modeling Using R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i15).
    2. Lixin Li & Xiaolu Zhou & Marc Kalo & Reinhard Piltner, 2016. "Spatiotemporal Interpolation Methods for the Application of Estimating Population Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter in the Contiguous U.S. and a Real-Time Web Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Maira Worek & Barbara Covarrubias Venegas & Sonja Thury, 2019. "Mind Your Space! Desk Sharing Working Environments and Employee Commitment in Austria," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 83-97.
    4. Taylor, Benjamin M. & Davies, Tilman M. & Rowlingson, Barry S. & Diggle, Peter J., 2013. "lgcp: An R Package for Inference with Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Log-Gaussian Cox Processes," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 52(i04).
    5. Roger S. Bivand, 2021. "Progress in the R ecosystem for representing and handling spatial data," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 515-546, October.
    6. Coenen, Marja & Kok, Robert A.W., 2014. "Workplace flexibility and new product development performance: The role of telework and flexible work schedules," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 564-576.
    7. Hutniczak, Barbara & Münch, Angela, 2018. "Fishermen's location choice under spatio-temporal update of expectations," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 124-136.
    8. Liao, Jenny & O'Brien, Anne T. & Jimmieson, Nerina L. & Restubog, Simon Lloyd D., 2015. "Predicting transactive memory system in multidisciplinary teams: The interplay between team and professional identities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 965-977.
    9. Ge, Jiaqi & Polhill, J. Gareth & Craig, Tony P., 2018. "Too much of a good thing? Using a spatial agent-based model to evaluate “unconventional” workplace sharing programmes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 83-97.
    10. Pebesma, Edzer & Bivand, Roger & Ribeiro, Paulo Justiniano, 2015. "Software for Spatial Statistics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i01).
    11. Latasri Hazarika1 & Anubha Shekhar Sinha, 2020. "Effect of virtual organizing on formal-informal interplay within an organization," Working papers 396, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    12. Jaap W. Ouwerkerk & Jos Bartels, 2022. "Is Anyone Else Feeling Completely Nonessential? Meaningful Work, Identification, Job Insecurity, and Online Organizational Behavior during a Lockdown in The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Benjamin Schneider & Jane Whittle, 2024. "Where is the Place in the History of Work? Worksites, Workspaces, and the Home-Work Nexus," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _213, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    14. Joseph Acquah & Francis Benyah & Jerry S. Y. Kuma, 2019. "Regularisation Technique for a Distributed Parameter Identification Problem," Journal of Mathematics Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 64-75, February.
    15. Gabriel, Edith & Rowlingson, Barry S. & Diggle, Peter J., 2013. "stpp: An R Package for Plotting, Simulating and Analyzing Spatio-Temporal Point Patterns," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 53(i02).
    16. Mariana Oliveira & Luís Torgo & Vítor Santos Costa, 2021. "Evaluation Procedures for Forecasting with Spatiotemporal Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-27, March.
    17. Hengl, Tomislav & Roudier, Pierre & Beaudette, Dylan & Pebesma, Edzer, 2015. "plotKML: Scientific Visualization of Spatio-Temporal Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i05).
    18. Aimée A. Kane, 2010. "Unlocking Knowledge Transfer Potential: Knowledge Demonstrability and Superordinate Social Identity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 643-660, June.
    19. Yoko E. Fukumura & Julie McLaughlin Gray & Gale M. Lucas & Burcin Becerik-Gerber & Shawn C. Roll, 2021. "Worker Perspectives on Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Office Workspaces: Implications for the Future of Office Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    20. de Iaco, Sandra, 2017. "The cgeostat Software for Analyzing Complex-Valued Random Fields," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 79(i05).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.