IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0269750.html

Cost-effectiveness analysis of bundled innovative devices versus standard approach in the prevention of unscheduled peripheral venous catheters removal due to complications in France

Author

Listed:
  • Franck Maunoury
  • Bertrand Drugeon
  • Matthieu Boisson
  • Nicolas Marjanovic
  • Raphael Couvreur
  • Olivier Mimoz
  • Jeremy Guenezan
  • on behalf of the CLEAN-3 Study

Abstract

The objective of the study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of bundled devices (BDs) versus standard devices (SDs) for the prevention of unscheduled peripheral venous catheter (PVC) removal due to complication from a French investigator-initiated, open-label, single center, randomized-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial (CLEAN-3 study). A 14-day time non homogeneous semi-markovian model was performed to be fitted to longitudinal individual patient data from CLEAN-3 database. This model includes five health states and eight transitional events; a base case scenario, two scenario analyses and bootstrap sensitivity analyses were performed. The cost-effectiveness criterion was the cost per patient with unscheduled PVC removal avoided. 989 adult (age≥18 years) patients were analyzed to compare the BDs group (494 patients), and the SDs group (495 patients). The assessed intervention was a combination of closed integrated catheters, positive displacement needleless-connectors, disinfecting caps, and single-use prefilled flush syringes compared with the use of open catheters and three-way stopcocks for treatment administration. For the base case scenario, an unscheduled 1st PVC removal before discharge was significantly more frequent in the SDs group (235 patients (47.5%) in the SDs group and 172 patients (34.8%) in the BDs group, p = 0.00006). After adjustment for 1st catheter time, the number of patients with unscheduled PVC removal per day was of 16 (95%CI: 15; 18) patients (out of 100) in the BDs group and of 26 (95%CI: 24; 28) patients (out of 100) in the SDs group. The mean cost per patient (adjusted on catheter-time) was of €144 (95%CI: €135-€154) for patients in the SDs group versus €102 (95%CI: €95-€109) for patients in the BDs group; the mean saving per patient was of €42 (95%CI: €32-€54). As a consequence, the assessed BDs strategy was less costly and more effective than the SDs strategy.Trail registration: CLEAN-3 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03757143.

Suggested Citation

  • Franck Maunoury & Bertrand Drugeon & Matthieu Boisson & Nicolas Marjanovic & Raphael Couvreur & Olivier Mimoz & Jeremy Guenezan & on behalf of the CLEAN-3 Study, 2022. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of bundled innovative devices versus standard approach in the prevention of unscheduled peripheral venous catheters removal due to complications in France," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269750
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269750
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269750&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0269750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackson, Christopher, 2011. "Multi-State Models for Panel Data: The msm Package for R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 38(i08).
    2. J.Robert Beck & Stephen G. Pauker, 1983. "The Markov Process in Medical Prognosis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 3(4), pages 419-458, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franck Maunoury & Christian Farinetto & Stéphane Ruckly & Jeremy Guenezan & Jean-Christophe Lucet & Alain Lepape & Julien Pascal & Bertrand Souweine & Olivier Mimoz & Jean-François Timsit, 2018. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol solution in the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related bloodstream infections in France," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Qiu, Qinjing & Kawai, Reiichiro, 2022. "A decoupling principle for Markov-modulated chains," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Jackson, Christopher, 2016. "flexsurv: A Platform for Parametric Survival Modeling in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(i08).
    4. Vernon T. Farewell & Li Su & Christopher Jackson, 2019. "Partially hidden multi-state modelling of a prolonged disease state defined by a composite outcome," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 696-711, October.
    5. Gaffney, Edward & McCann, Fergal, 2019. "The cyclicality in SICR: mortgage modelling under IFRS 9," ESRB Working Paper Series 92, European Systemic Risk Board.
    6. Sek-yum Ngai, Steven & Cheung, Chau-kiu & Ng, Yuen-hang & Joo Lee, Bong & Dupéré, Véronique & Wang, Miao & Zhou, Qiushi & Chen, Chen & Li, Yunjun & Wong, Laing-ming & Yu, Elly Ngai-hin, 2025. "Unraveling the school-to-work transition of non-engaged youth: A continuous-time Markov chain analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Biagini, Francesca & Groll, Andreas & Widenmann, Jan, 2013. "Intensity-based premium evaluation for unemployment insurance products," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 302-316.
    8. Karina Hansen & Christophe Lançon & Mondher Toumi, 2006. "Pharmacoeconomic modelling in schizophrenia," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(1), pages 19-29, March.
    9. del Campo, Cristina & Bai, Jiaru & Keller, L. Robin, 2025. "Modeling cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment sequencing," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Touraine, Célia & Gerds, Thomas A. & Joly, Pierre, 2017. "SmoothHazard: An R Package for Fitting Regression Models to Interval-Censored Observations of Illness-Death Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 79(i07).
    11. Sharples, Linda D., 2018. "The role of statistics in the era of big data: Electronic health records for healthcare research," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 105-110.
    12. Rebecca Lynn Perez & Hao Chung The & Kithalakshmi Vignesvaran & Wei Cong Tan & Melissa Sin Hui Chua & En Ying Tan & Si Yu Peng & Lingyue Zhou & Shweta Rajkumar Singh & Wesley Yeung & Ivan Seah & Jeane, 2025. "Transmission dynamics of Escherichia coli sequence type 131 in households—a one health prospective cohort study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Alex Bottle & Chiara Maria Ventura & Kumar Dharmarajan & Paul Aylin & Francesca Ieva & Anna Maria Paganoni, 2018. "Regional variation in hospitalisation and mortality in heart failure: comparison of England and Lombardy using multistate modelling," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 292-304, June.
    14. Donna M. Edwards & Ross D. Shachter & Douglas K. Owens, 1998. "A Dynamic HIV-Transmission Model for Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Vaccine Programs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 144-166, June.
    15. Wildhaber, Mark L. & Albers, Janice L. & Green, Nicholas S. & Moran, Edward H., 2017. "A fully-stochasticized, age-structured population model for population viability analysis of fish: Lower Missouri River endangered pallid sturgeon example," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 434-448.
    16. David G. Simon, 1986. "A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Cyclosporine in Cadaveric Kidney Transplantation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 6(4), pages 199-207, December.
    17. de Wit, G.Ardine & Ramsteijn, Paul G & de Charro, Frank Th, 1998. "Economic evaluation of end stage renal disease treatment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 215-232, June.
    18. Alexandra Grand & Regina Dittrich & Brian Francis, 2015. "Markov models of dependence in longitudinal paired comparisons: an application to course design," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 99(2), pages 237-257, April.
    19. Budhi Surya, 2021. "A new class of conditional Markov jump processes with regime switching and path dependence: properties and maximum likelihood estimation," Papers 2107.07026, arXiv.org.
    20. Linda Möstel & Marius Pfeuffer & Matthias Fischer, 2020. "Statistical inference for Markov chains with applications to credit risk," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1659-1684, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.