IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0269039.html

Integrating sustainable Islamic social finance: An Analytical Network Process using the Benefit Opportunity Cost Risk (ANP BOCR) framework: The case of Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Tika Widiastuti
  • Anidah Robani
  • Puji Sucia Sukmaningrum
  • Imron Mawardi
  • Sri Ningsih
  • Sri Herianingrum
  • Muhammad Ubaidillah Al-Mustofa

Abstract

The utilization of Islamic social finance instruments is far behind what is expected. To realize its full potential, Islamic social finance instruments must be integrated. This study examined solutions and priority strategies for integrating sustainable Islamic social finance that could be implemented in the short and long term using the Benefit, Opportunity, Cost, and Risk (BOCR) framework, which includes six aspects: Governance, sustainable financing, institutional aspect, human resources, regulations, and supporting technology. This qualitative research employed the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method using the benefit, opportunity, cost, and risk analysis. The data were obtained mainly through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with respondents among academics, practitioners, associations, regulators, and community leaders. The respondents were selected for their expertise and experience in the selected topic. The data were processed using the Microsoft Excel and Super Decision software. There are several findings worth considering from the analysis. First, the highest priority in integrating Islamic social finance aspects are human resources (0.97), regulation (0.86), and technology (0.76). Second, based on the short- and long-term analysis, financial integration through sustainable financing (0.01 and 1.44, respectively) and improving human resource quality through certification and training (0.01 and 1.56, respectively) is a priority solution and strategy to integrate sustainable Islamic social finance. Meanwhile, according to expert judgments, integrating national data (0.24) and optimizing technology use (0.18) are priority solutions and strategies. The findings emphasize the critical role of improving human resource quality to utilize technology, with experts identifying a national data integration as the most critical solution. As a result, relevant stakeholders are concerned about technology management training for Islamic philanthropic managers, with the goal of maximizing the potential of technology’s growing role and adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Tika Widiastuti & Anidah Robani & Puji Sucia Sukmaningrum & Imron Mawardi & Sri Ningsih & Sri Herianingrum & Muhammad Ubaidillah Al-Mustofa, 2022. "Integrating sustainable Islamic social finance: An Analytical Network Process using the Benefit Opportunity Cost Risk (ANP BOCR) framework: The case of Indonesia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269039
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269039
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269039&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0269039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Aibolovna Kuanova & Rimma Sagiyeva & Nasim Shah Shirazi, 2021. "Islamic social finance: a literature review and future research directions," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(5), pages 707-728, July.
    2. Hassan Azganin & Salina Kassim & Auwal Adam Sa’ad, 2021. "Proposed waqf crowdfunding models for small farmers and the required parameters for their application," Islamic Economic Studies, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 29, pages 2-17.
    3. Phu Nguyen Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-32, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    4. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2006. "Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-33987-0, February.
    5. Tika Widiastuti & Eko Fajar Cahyono & Siti Zulaikha & Imron Mawardi & Muhammad Ubaidillah Al Mustofa, 2021. "Optimizing zakat governance in East Java using analytical network process (ANP): the role of zakat technology (ZakaTech)," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 301-319, February.
    6. Gizem Arikan & Pazit Ben-Nun Bloom, 2019. "“I was hungry and you gave me food”: Religiosity and attitudes toward redistribution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors," Post-Print hal-03472060, HAL.
    8. Rahmatina Awaliah Kasri & Adela Miranti Yuniar, 2021. "Determinants of digital zakat payments: lessons from Indonesian experience," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 362-379, April.
    9. Mutamimah Mutamimah & Suryani Alifah & Gunawan Gunawan & Made Dwi Adnjani, 2021. "ICT-based collaborative framework for improving the performance of zakat management organisations in Indonesia," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(6), pages 887-903, August.
    10. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Fahmi Ali Hudaefi, 2020. "How does Islamic fintech promote the SDGs? Qualitative evidence from Indonesia," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 353-366, March.
    12. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2013. "Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-7279-7, February.
    13. Thomas L. Saaty, 2006. "The Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, chapter 0, pages 1-26, Springer.
    14. Tika Widiastuti & Ilmiawan Auwalin & Lina Nugraha Rani & Muhammad Ubaidillah Al Mustofa, 2021. "A mediating effect of business growth on zakat empowerment program and mustahiq’s welfare," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1882039-188, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tika Widiastuti & Arie Prasetyo & Anidah Robani & Imron Mawardi & Rida Rosida & Muhammad Ubaidillah Al Mustofa, 2022. "Toward developing a sustainability index for the Islamic Social Finance program: An empirical investigation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Haneen Abuzaid & Mahmoud Awad & Abdulrahim Shamayleh, 2024. "Photovoltaic Modules’ Cleaning Method Selection for the MENA Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Bo WU & Ioana FILIPAS, 2025. "Incentives for sustainable efforts considering double moral hazard and multi goals in supply chains," Working Papers of BETA 2025-25, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    4. Wu, Chen-Fa & Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Chen, Szu-Hung & Trac, Luu Van Thong, 2024. "Assessing the efficiency of bird habitat conservation strategies in farmland ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    5. Khanh Huy Nguyen & Mai Dong Tran, 2025. "Exploring the Landscape of Pro-Environmental Behaviours and Sustainable Consumer Behaviours: Unveiling Priority Research Areas Through Bibliometric Insights," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    6. Kene Boun My & Quang-Huy Nguyen & Phu Nguyen-Van & Thi Kim Cuong Pham & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet & Nguyen To-The, 2025. "Farmers' preferences toward organic certification scheme: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Northern Vietnam," Working Papers hal-04931827, HAL.
    7. Maho Nakagawa & Mathieu Lefebvre & Anne Stenger, 2022. "Long-lasting effects of incentives and social preference: A public goods experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Wolfgang Ossadnik & Stefanie Schinke & Ralf H. Kaspar, 2016. "Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 421-457, March.
    9. Ali Aghazadeh Ardebili & Elio Padoano & Antonella Longo & Antonio Ficarella, 2022. "The Risky-Opportunity Analysis Method (ROAM) to Support Risk-Based Decisions in a Case-Study of Critical Infrastructure Digitization," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Asil Oztekin & Joseph Ekong & Ali Dag, 2019. "Measuring the efficiency of hospitals: a fully-ranking DEA–FAHP approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 361-378, July.
    11. Afsaneh Afzali & Soheil Sabri & M. Rashid & Jamal Mohammad Vali Samani & Ahmad Ludin, 2014. "Inter-Municipal Landfill Site Selection Using Analytic Network Process," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(8), pages 2179-2194, June.
    12. Baffoe, Gideon, 2019. "Exploring the utility of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in ranking livelihood activities for effective and sustainable rural development interventions in developing countries," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 197-204.
    13. Reza Azimi & Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini & Mohammad Majid Fouladgar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Mohammad Hossein Basiri, 2011. "Ranking the strategies of mining sector through anp and topsis in a swot framework," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 670-689, September.
    14. Daniel Toth & Jaroslava Janků & Adéla Marie Marhoul & Josef Kozák & Mansoor Maitah & Jan Jehlička & Lukáš Řeháček & Richard Přikryl & Tomáš Herza & Jan Vopravil & David Kincl & Tomáš Khel, 2023. "Soil quality assessment using SAS (Soil Assessment System)," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15.
    15. Fuat Sekmen & Isa Demirkol & Haşmet Gökırmak, 2024. "Evaluation of urban transportation preferences with analytical hierarchy process method," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 2087-2101, June.
    16. Oryani, Bahareh & Koo, Yoonmo & Rezania, Shahabaldin & Shafiee, Afsaneh, 2021. "Barriers to renewable energy technologies penetration: Perspective in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 971-983.
    17. Ravi Kumar Gedela & K. Krishna Mohan & V. Kamakshi Prasad, 2018. "Application of BOCR models in service oriented architecture (SOA): study on model validation through quantification for QoS considerations," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(6), pages 1346-1354, December.
    18. Jing-Wei Liu & Che-Wei Chang & Yao-Ji Wang & Yi-Hui Liu, 2022. "Constructing a Decision Model for Health Club Members to Purchase Coaching Programs during the COVID-19 Epidemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Kazim Topuz & Ali Dag & Asil Oztekin, 2019. "An AHP-IFT Integrated Model for Performance Evaluation of E-Commerce Web Sites," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1345-1355, December.
    20. Starr, Morgan & Joshi, Omkar & Will, Rodney E. & Zou, Chris B., 2019. "Perceptions regarding active management of the Cross-timbers forest resources of Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas: A SWOT-ANP analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 523-530.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.