IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0253657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A gross margin analysis for Nguni cattle farmers in Limpopo Province, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Mapule Valencia Nkadimeng
  • Godswill Makombe
  • Obvious Mapiye
  • Cletos Mapiye
  • Isaac Oluwatayo
  • Kennedy Dzama
  • Cedric Mojapelo
  • Naftali Mollel
  • Jones Ngambi
  • Madimetja Human Mautjana

Abstract

Factors such as increases in population, urbanization, growth in per capita income and changes in consumer taste and preferences are causing gradual increases in livestock product consumption and demand. South Africa is addressing this predicted increase in livestock products demand by commercializing smallholder livestock producers. The Limpopo Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) Nguni Cattle Development Project is an example of such effort. The economic performance of these efforts needs to be evaluated. We use gross margin analysis to evaluate the performance of the Limpopo IDC Nguni Cattle Development Project. Additionally, we use regression analysis to identify factors influencing gross margins. Our results indicate that although smallholders show potential to commercialize, they lack commercial farming experience and require that a strong extension support system be used as one of the strategies to improve profitability. We also noted that individual farmers were more profitable than group farmers. Multiple regression analysis shows that three variables could be used to stimulate gross margin among the Limpopo IDC Nguni Cattle Development Project farmers. These are herd size, distance to market and farm size. Since farm size is a given, policy should focus on assisting farmers to build their herds and to have better access to markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Mapule Valencia Nkadimeng & Godswill Makombe & Obvious Mapiye & Cletos Mapiye & Isaac Oluwatayo & Kennedy Dzama & Cedric Mojapelo & Naftali Mollel & Jones Ngambi & Madimetja Human Mautjana, 2021. "A gross margin analysis for Nguni cattle farmers in Limpopo Province, South Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253657
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253657
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253657&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0253657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marandure, Tawanda & Dzama, Kennedy & Bennett, James & Makombe, Godswill & Mapiye, Cletos, 2020. "Application of system dynamics modelling in evaluating sustainability of low-input ruminant farming systems in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    2. H. J. Sartorius von Bach & K. M. Kalundu, 2020. "An econometric estimation of gross margin volatility: a case of ox production in Namibia," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(4), pages 401-411, October.
    3. Bahta, Sirak & Baker, Derek, 2015. "Determinants of Profit Efficiency Among Smallholder Beef Producers in Botswana," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Saul Ngarava & Mzwanele Phetshe & Abbyssinia Mushunje, 2019. "Market Awareness and Participation for Cattle Farmers in the Kaonafatso ya Dikgomo (KyD) Scheme in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Andrieu, Nadine & Descheemaeker, Katrien & Sanou, Thierry & Chia, Eduardo, 2015. "Effects of technical interventions on flexibility of farming systems in Burkina Faso: Lessons for the design of innovations in West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 125-137.
    6. Ndoro, Jorine & Mudhara, Maxwell & Chimonyo, Michael & Hitayezu, Patrick, 2015. "Farmers' Choice of Cattle Marketing Channels in Rural South Africa: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212526, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Babu, Suresh Chandra & Shishodia, Mahika, 2017. "Agribusiness competitiveness: Applying analytics, typology, and measurements to Africa," IFPRI discussion papers 1648, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Andrieu, N. & Blundo-Canto, G. & Cruz-Garcia, G.S., 2019. "Trade-offs between food security and forest exploitation by mestizo households in Ucayali, Peruvian Amazon," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 64-77.
    3. Argade Aashish & Laha, A. K., 2018. "E-commerce in oligopsonistic and relational markets – An empirical investigation of transaction costs in agricultural e-markets in India from farmers’ perspective," IIMA Working Papers WP 2018-06-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    4. Renato A. Villano & Isaac Koomson & Nkhanedzeni B. Nengovhela & Livhuwani Mudau & Heather M. Burrow & Navjot Bhullar, 2023. "Relationships between Farmer Psychological Profiles and Farm Business Performance amongst Smallholder Beef and Poultry Farmers in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Lelethu Mdoda & Ajuruchukwu Obi & Nthabeleng Tamako & Denver Naidoo & Raesetse Baloyi, 2023. "Resource Use Efficiency of Potato Production among Smallholder Irrigated Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Andrieu, N. & Sogoba, B. & Zougmore, R. & Howland, F. & Samake, O. & Bonilla-Findji, O. & Lizarazo, M. & Nowak, A. & Dembele, C. & Corner-Dolloff, C., 2017. "Prioritizing investments for climate-smart agriculture: Lessons learned from Mali," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 13-24.
    7. Tsakiridis, Andreas & Breen, James & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Hanrahan, Kevin & Wallace, Michael & Crosson, Paul, 2016. "Flexibility of beef suckler cow systems under varying calf retention strategies," 90th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2016, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 236289, Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. Richard E.O Pearce & Abdullah Bah, 2024. "Estimation of Efficiency and the Effect of Access to Finance on Efficiency of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMES) in the Western area of Sierra Leone," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 1-1.
    9. Bakker, Teatske & Dugué, Patrick & de Tourdonnet, Stéphane, 2022. "How do farmers change their practices at the farm level after co-design processes in Farmer Field Schools?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Bahta, S. & Temoso, O. & Mekonnen, D. & Malope, P. & Staal, S., 2018. "Technical efficiency of beef production in agricultural districts of Botswana: A Latent Class Stochastic Frontier Model Approach," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277207, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Jaime Martínez-Valderrama & Javier Ibáñez Puerta, 2023. "System Dynamics Tools to Study Mediterranean Rangeland’s Sustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Datola, Giulia & Bottero, Marta & De Angelis, Elena & Romagnoli, Francesco, 2022. "Operationalising resilience: A methodological framework for assessing urban resilience through System Dynamics Model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    13. Herrera, H & Schütz, L & Paas, W & Reidsma, P & Kopainsky, B, 2022. "Understanding resilience of farming systems: Insights from system dynamics modelling for an arable farming system in the Netherlands," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    14. Snow, Val & Rodriguez, Daniel & Dynes, Robyn & Kaye-Blake, William & Mallawaarachchi, Thilak & Zydenbos, Sue & Cong, Lei & Obadovic, Irena & Agnew, Rob & Amery, Nicole & Bell, Lindsay & Benson, Cristy, 2021. "Resilience achieved via multiple compensating subsystems: The immediate impacts of COVID-19 control measures on the agri-food systems of Australia and New Zealand," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    15. Périnelle, Anne & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Scopel, Eric, 2021. "Combining on-farm innovation tracking and participatory prototyping trials to develop legume-based cropping systems in West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.