IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0223346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm

Author

Listed:
  • Anne-Catherine Dalcq
  • Thomas Dogot
  • Yves Beckers
  • Yves Brostaux
  • Eric Froidmont
  • Frédéric Vanwindekens
  • Hélène Soyeurt

Abstract

Dairy farming systems are evolving. This study presents dairy producers’ perceptions of their ideal future farm (IFF) to ensure revenue, and attempts to determine the reasons for this choice, the environmental aspects related to this choice, the proximity between the current farm and the IFF and the requirements for reaching this IFF. Just before the end of the European milk quota, a total of 245 Walloon dairy producers answered a survey about the characteristics of their IFF and other socio-environmental-economic information. A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was carried out using seven characteristics of the IFF (intensive vs. extensive, specialised vs. diversified, strongly vs. weakly based on new technologies, managed by a group of managers vs. an independent farmer, employed vs. familial workforce, local vs. global market, standard vs. quality-differentiated production) to observe the relationships between them. Based on the main contributors to the second dimension of the MCA, this axis was defined as an IFF gradient between the local-based extensive (LBE) producers (26%) and the global-based intensive (GBI) producers (46%). The differences of IFF gradient between modalities of categorical variables were estimated using generalised linear models. Pearson correlations were calculated between the scores on the IFF gradient and quantitative variables. Finally, frequencies of IFF characteristics and the corresponding characteristic for the current situation were calculated to determine the percentages of “unhappy” producers. Some reasons for the choice of IFF by the producers have been highlighted in this study. Environmental initiatives were more valued by LBE than GBI producers. Low similarity was observed between the current farm situation of the respondents and their IFF choice. LBE and GBI producers differed significantly regarding domains of formation (technical and bureaucratic vs. transformation and diversification respectively) and paths of formation (non-market vs. market respectively). Two kinds of farming systems were considered by dairy producers and some socioeconomic and environmental components differed between them.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne-Catherine Dalcq & Thomas Dogot & Yves Beckers & Yves Brostaux & Eric Froidmont & Frédéric Vanwindekens & Hélène Soyeurt, 2020. "The Walloon farmers position differently their ideal dairy production system between a global-based intensive and a local-based extensive model of farm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0223346
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223346
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223346&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0223346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Mazoyer & Laurence Roudart, 1997. "Histoire des agricultures du monde: Du Néolithique à la crise contemporaine," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/44782, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alain Clément, 2006. "Les lois économiques doivent-elles s’appliquer aux biens de subsistance ?," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 79, pages 10-36.
    2. Rémy Herrera & Poeura Tetoe, 2013. "The Papua Niugini Paradox. Land property archaism and Modernity of peasant resistance ?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00786274, HAL.
    3. Palliere, Augustin, 2015. "Différenciation et marginalisation de la paysannerie en Sierra Leone," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 347(May-June).
    4. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 1999. "The Economics Of Agricultural Biotechnology: Historical And Analytical Framework," Working Papers 31845, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    5. Demont, Matty & Jouve, Philippe & Stessens, Johan & Tollens, Eric, 2004. "Boserup Versus Malthus Revisited: Evolution Of Farms In Northern Cote D'Ivoire," Working Papers 31836, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    6. Michalska Sylwia, 2016. "Family Farming in Poland and in the World – Thematic Edition of Wieś i Rolnictwo [Countryside and Agriculture] Quarterly Magazine," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 271-279, December.
    7. Cécile Barnaud & Annemarie van Paassen, 2013. "Equity, power games, and legitimacy: dilemmas of participatory natural resource management," Post-Print hal-01386409, HAL.
    8. Mermet, Laurent & Farcy, Christine, 2011. "Contexts and concepts of forest planning in a diverse and contradictory world," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 361-365, June.
    9. Clément, Alain, 2006. "Les lois économiques doivent-elles s’appliquer aux biens de subsistance ?," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 79.
    10. Tordjman, Hélène, 2011. "La crise contemporaine, une crise de la modernité technique," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 10.
    11. Yohann Fare & Marc Dufumier & Myriam Loloum & Fanny Miss & Alassane Pouye & Ahmat Khastalani & Adama Fall, 2017. "Analysis and Diagnosis of the Agrarian System in the Niayes Region, Northwest Senegal (West Africa)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Christian Deverre & Christine De Sainte Marie, 2008. "L’écologisation de la politique agricole européenne. Verdissement ou refondation des systèmes agro-alimentaires ?," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 89(4), pages 83-104.
    13. Castella, Jean-Christophe & Boissau, Stanislas & Trung, Tran Ngoc & Quang, Dang Dinh, 2005. "Agrarian transition and lowland-upland interactions in mountain areas in northern Vietnam: application of a multi-agent simulation model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 312-332, December.
    14. Alain Clément, 2005. "Régulation économique et sociale et libéralisme mondial dans l'Angleterre de la première moitié du XIXe siècle : les corn laws en débat," Post-Print halshs-00138310, HAL.
    15. Andreia Saavedra Cardoso & Tiago Domingos & Manuela Raposo De Magalhães & José De Melo-Abreu & Jorge Palma, 2017. "Mapping the Lisbon Potential Foodshed in Ribatejo e Oeste: A Suitability and Yield Model for Assessing the Potential for Localized Food Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-31, November.
    16. Pierre Gasselin & Michel Vaillant & Benjamin Bathfield, 2012. "The activity system. A position paper," Post-Print hal-00742998, HAL.
    17. Bruno Dorin & Jean Charles Hourcade & Michel Benoit-Cattin, 2013. "A World without Farmers ? The Lewis Path Revisited," Working Papers hal-00866413, HAL.
    18. Demont, Matty & Jouve, Philippe & Stessens, Johan & Tollens, Eric, 2000. "The Evolution Of Farming Systems In Northern Cote D'Ivoire: Boserup Versus Malthus And Competition Versus Complementarity," Working Papers 31846, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    19. Sourisseau, Jean-Michel & Bonnal, Philippe & Marzin, Jacques & Losch, Bruno & Bosc, Pierre-Marie, 2015. "Znaczenie Rolnictwa Rodzinnego W Procesach Rozwoju. Wnioski I Rekomendacje," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 1(166.1).
    20. Tarik Dahou & Abdourahmane Ndiaye, 2009. "Les enjeux d'une réforme foncière," Post-Print halshs-00817009, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0223346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.