IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0220222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fractionated analysis of hot and cool self-regulation in cigarette smokers from different socioeconomic backgrounds

Author

Listed:
  • Raquel de Luna Antonio
  • Sabine Pompeia

Abstract

Smoking cigarettes and low socioeconomic status (SES) are both related to impaired cognition. However, it is unknown whether people of lower SES, who comprise most tobacco smokers worldwide, are more susceptible to cognitive impairment associated with smoking. In this non-randomized, cross-sectional study we investigated the effects of cigarette smoking, SES and their interaction on dissociable executive or “cool” and “hot” measures of behavioural self-regulation. Participants (n = 80) were selected among young physically and mentally healthy smokers and non-smokers who had graduated high school and were from different SES backgrounds. Cool self-regulation was measured by executive function tasks that tap inhibition, updating, shifting, dual tasking, planning, access to long-term memory (semantic fluency), and working memory capacity. Hot measures assessed self-reported impulsivity, delay discounting and risk taking. Exposure to tobacco (cotinine, exhaled carbon monoxide, tobacco dependence, cigarette consumption) was assessed to determine to what extent it mediated the cognitive effects of smoking. Nicotine abstinence and its acute effects were controlled, as were sex, age, schooling, and psychiatric symptoms despite the fact that smokers and non-smokers were selected as being as similar as possible in these demographic characteristics. Lower SES (less years of parental schooling) was associated with worse performance on tasks that measured all cool domains except dual tasking and fluency, while smoking status was related to impaired delayed discounting and impulsivity (hot domains), effects that were not mediated by tobacco exposure. Smoking and SES, however, did not interact. In short, impaired performance in measures of most cool skills was associated with SES irrespective of smoking status; in contrast, regardless of SES, smokers showed specific impairment in hot self-regulation domains (more difficulty resisting immediate temptations and weighing future consequences of actions). Possible explanations for the lack of mediation of tobacco exposure on hot skills of smokers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Raquel de Luna Antonio & Sabine Pompeia, 2019. "A fractionated analysis of hot and cool self-regulation in cigarette smokers from different socioeconomic backgrounds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220222
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220222
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220222&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0220222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wood, Michael, 1998. "Socio-economic status, delay of gratification, and impulse buying," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 295-320, June.
    2. Hong Guo & Zhihong Sa, 2015. "Socioeconomic Differentials in Smoking Duration among Adult Male Smokers in China: Result from the 2006 China Health and Nutrition Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, January.
    3. World Health Organization, 2015. "WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2015: Raising taxes on tobacco," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt1fh1f32m, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    4. Ulrich S Tran & Agnes A Hofer & Martin Voracek, 2014. "Sex Differences in General Knowledge: Meta-Analysis and New Data on the Contribution of School-Related Moderators among High-School Students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vannia Mehsen & Lilian Morag & Sergio Chesta & Kristol Cleaton & Héctor Burgos, 2021. "Hot Executive Function Assessment Instruments in Preschool Children: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junichi Minagawa & Thorsten Upmann, 2019. "Price Effects on Compound Commodities," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(2), pages 630-646, April.
    2. Odermatt, Reto & Stutzer, Alois, 2018. "Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Behavior in Europe: More Than Trends?," Working papers 2018/24, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    3. Rohini Ruhil, 2015. "Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals," International Studies, , vol. 52(1-4), pages 118-135, January.
    4. Shakeel Ahmad Sofi & Faizan Ashraf Mir & Mubashir Majid Baba, 2020. "Cognition and affect in consumer decision making: conceptualization and validation of added constructs in modified instrument," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Donald A. P. Bundy & Nilanthi de Silva & Susan Horton & Dean T. Jamison & George C. Patton, 2017. "Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 28876, December.
    6. Chandan Parsad & Sanjeev Prashar & Vijay Sai Tata, 2017. "Understanding nature of store ambiance and individual impulse buying tendency on impulsive purchasing behaviour: an emerging market perspective," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 44(4), pages 297-311, December.
    7. Allah Wasaya & Bilal Khan & Muhammad Shafee & Mirza Sajid Mahmood, 2016. "Impact of Brand Equity, Advertisement and Hedonic Consumption Tendencies on Cognitive Dissonance: A Mediation Study," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 154-162, June.
    8. Hofmans, J. & Pepermans, R. & Loix, E., 2009. "Measurement invariance matters: A case made for the ORTOFIN," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 667-674, August.
    9. Joaquin Gómez-Miñambres & Eric Schniter, 2017. "Emotions and Behavior Regulation in Decision Dilemmas," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Muxing Xie & Chunrong Jia & Yawei Zhang & Beibei Wang & Ning Qin & Suzhen Cao & Liyun Zhao & Dongmei Yu & Xiaoli Duan, 2020. "Household Exposure to Secondhand Smoke among Chinese Children: Status, Determinants, and Co-Exposures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
    11. Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Mishra, Hari Govind & Kaul, Surabhi & Singh, Sarabjot, 2014. "Buying Impulsive Trait: An effective moderator for shopping emotions and perceived risk," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-03-17, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    12. Ce Shang & Jidong Huang & Kai-Wen Cheng & Yanyun He & Frank J. Chaloupka, 2017. "The Association between Warning Label Requirements and Cigarette Smoking Prevalence by Education-Findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Harsman Tandilittin, 2016. "What should the Government do to Stop Epidemic of Smoking among Teenagers in Indonesia?," Asian Culture and History, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 140-140, March.
    14. Gasiorowska, Agata, 2008. "Różnice indywidualne jako determinanty postaw wobec pieniędzy [Individual differences as determinants of money attitudes]," MPRA Paper 42684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Marek Kośny & Maria Piotrowska, 2019. "Economic Resourcefulness: Definition and Modeling," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 425-449, July.
    16. Camila Steffens & Paula Pereda, 2022. "Dynamic effects of smoking bans on addictive behavior among young adults," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2022_03, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    17. Cheru Tesema Leshargie & Animut Alebel & Getiye Dejenu Kibret & Molla Yigzaw Birhanu & Henok Mulugeta & Patricia Malloy & Fasil Wagnew & Atsede Alle Ewunetie & Daniel Bekele Ketema & Alehegn Aderaw & , 2019. "The impact of peer pressure on cigarette smoking among high school and university students in Ethiopia: A systemic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Ugbomhe, O. Ugbomhe & P, E. Okpamen & Adomokhai, S. Simon, 2021. "Effects of Demographic Factors on Impulse Buying Behaviour of Consumers in Auchi, Edo State, Nigeria," OSF Preprints xcrz2, Center for Open Science.
    19. Aysen Akyuz, 2018. "Determinant Factors Influencing Impulse Buying Behavior of Turkish Customers in Supermarket Setting," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 7(1), pages 01-10, January.
    20. Lu Niu & Dan Luo & Vincent M.B. Silenzio & Shuiyuan Xiao & Yongquan Tian, 2015. "Are Informing Knowledge and Supportive Attitude Enough for Tobacco Control? A Latent Class Analysis of Cigarette Smoking Patterns among Medical Teachers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.