IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0194243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape connectivity for bobcat (Lynx rufus) and lynx (Lynx canadensis) in the Northeastern United States

Author

Listed:
  • Laura E Farrell
  • Daniel M Levy
  • Therese Donovan
  • Ruth Mickey
  • Alan Howard
  • Jennifer Vashon
  • Mark Freeman
  • Kim Royar
  • C William Kilpatrick

Abstract

Landscape connectivity is integral to the persistence of metapopulations of wide ranging carnivores and other terrestrial species. The objectives of this research were to investigate the landscape characteristics essential to use of areas by lynx and bobcats in northern New England, map a habitat availability model for each species, and explore connectivity across areas of the region likely to experience future development pressure. A Mahalanobis distance analysis was conducted on location data collected between 2005 and 2010 from 16 bobcats in western Vermont and 31 lynx in northern Maine to determine which variables were most consistent across all locations for each species using three scales based on average 1) local (15 minute) movement, 2) linear distance between daily locations, and 3) female home range size. The bobcat model providing the widest separation between used locations and random study area locations suggests that they cue into landscape features such as edge, availability of cover, and development density at different scales. The lynx model with the widest separation between random and used locations contained five variables including natural habitat, cover, and elevation—all at different scales. Shrub scrub habitat—where lynx’s preferred prey is most abundant—was represented at the daily distance moved scale. Cross validation indicated that outliers had little effect on models for either species. A habitat suitability value was calculated for each 30 m2 pixel across Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine for each species and used to map connectivity between conserved lands within selected areas across the region. Projections of future landscape change illustrated potential impacts of anthropogenic development on areas lynx and bobcat may use, and indicated where connectivity for bobcats and lynx may be lost. These projections provided a guide for conservation of landscape permeability for lynx, bobcat, and species relying on similar habitats in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura E Farrell & Daniel M Levy & Therese Donovan & Ruth Mickey & Alan Howard & Jennifer Vashon & Mark Freeman & Kim Royar & C William Kilpatrick, 2018. "Landscape connectivity for bobcat (Lynx rufus) and lynx (Lynx canadensis) in the Northeastern United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0194243
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194243
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194243&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0194243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brad H McRae & Sonia A Hall & Paul Beier & David M Theobald, 2012. "Where to Restore Ecological Connectivity? Detecting Barriers and Quantifying Restoration Benefits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Jens Roland & Philip D. Taylor, 1997. "Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6626), pages 710-713, April.
    3. Mathieu Basille & Bram Van Moorter & Ivar Herfindal & Jodie Martin & John D C Linnell & John Odden & Reidar Andersen & Jean-Michel Gaillard, 2013. "Selecting Habitat to Survive: The Impact of Road Density on Survival in a Large Carnivore," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert F. Baldwin & Nakisha T. Fouch, 2018. "Understanding the Biodiversity Contributions of Small Protected Areas Presents Many Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Katherine A. Zeller & David W. Wattles & Javan M. Bauder & Stephen DeStefano, 2020. "Forecasting Seasonal Habitat Connectivity in a Developing Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Megan K. Jennings & Emily Haeuser & Diane Foote & Rebecca L. Lewison & Erin Conlisk, 2020. "Planning for Dynamic Connectivity: Operationalizing Robust Decision-Making and Prioritization Across Landscapes Experiencing Climate and Land-Use Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Zixuan Li & Jiang Chang & Cheng Li & Sihao Gu, 2023. "Ecological Restoration and Protection of National Land Space in Coal Resource-Based Cities from the Perspective of Ecological Security Pattern: A Case Study in Huaibei City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, February.
    5. Andrius Kučas & Linas Balčiauskas & Carlo Lavalle, 2023. "Identification of Urban and Wildlife Terrestrial Corridor Intersections for Planning of Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Mitigation Measures," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Zhenfeng Wang & Yan Liu & Xiangqun Xie & Xinke Wang & Hong Lin & Huili Xie & Xingzhao Liu, 2022. "Identifying Key Areas of Green Space for Ecological Restoration Based on Ecological Security Patterns in Fujian Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Xiufeng Cao & Zhaoshun Liu & Shujie Li & Zhenjun Gao, 2022. "Integrating the Ecological Security Pattern and the PLUS Model to Assess the Effects of Regional Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of Hefei City, Anhui Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Stallman, Heidi R. & James, Harvey S., 2015. "Determinants affecting farmers' willingness to cooperate to control pests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 182-192.
    9. Liu Yang & Mengmeng Suo & Shunqian Gao & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Construction of an Ecological Network Based on an Integrated Approach and Circuit Theory: A Case Study of Panzhou in Guizhou Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, July.
    10. Babin-Fenske, Jennifer & Anand, Madhur, 2011. "Agent-based simulation of effects of stress on forest tent caterpillar (Malacosoma disstria Hübner) population dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2561-2569.
    11. Jiaquan Duan & Yue ‘e Cao & Bo Liu & Yinyin Liang & Jinyu Tu & Jiahui Wang & Yeyang Li, 2023. "Construction of an Ecological Security Pattern in Yangtze River Delta Based on Circuit Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Dominati, Estelle J. & Mackay, Alec D. & Rendel, John M. & Wall, Andrew & Norton, David A. & Pannell, Jennifer & Devantier, Brian, 2021. "Farm scale assessment of the impacts of biodiversity enhancement on the financial and environmental performance of mixed livestock farms in New Zealand," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Ehsan Rahimi & Pinliang Dong, 2023. "Identifying barriers and pinch-points of large mammal corridors in Iran," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 285-297, June.
    14. Andrius Kučas & Linas Balčiauskas, 2021. "Roadkill-Data-Based Identification and Ranking of Mammal Habitats," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-35, May.
    15. Jun Jiang & Hailin Zhang & Qing Huang & Fei Liu & Long Li & Hongrui Qiu & Shizhe Zhou, 2023. "Diagnosis of Key Ecological Restoration Areas in Territorial Space under the Guidance of Resilience: A Case Study of the Chengdu–Chongqing Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Cobbold, Christina A. & Roland, Jens & Lewis, Mark A., 2009. "The impact of parasitoid emergence time on host–parasitoid population dynamics," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 201-215.
    17. Noel G Hahn & Cesar Rodriguez-Saona & George C Hamilton, 2017. "Characterizing the spatial distribution of brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys Stål (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), populations in peach orchards," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Chunguang Hu & Zhiyong Wang & Gaoliu Huang & Yichen Ding, 2022. "Construction, Evaluation, and Optimization of a Regional Ecological Security Pattern Based on MSPA–Circuit Theory Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Fuqin Yu & Baiping Zhang & Yonghui Yao & Jing Wang & Xinghang Zhang & Junjie Liu & Jiayu Li, 2022. "Identifying Connectivity Conservation Priorities among Protected Areas in Qinling-Daba Mountains, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Methorst, Joel & Rehdanz, Katrin & Mueller, Thomas & Hansjürgens, Bernd & Bonn, Aletta & Böhning-Gaese, Katrin, 2021. "The importance of species diversity for human well-being in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0194243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.