IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0188217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel method to rapidly distinguish the geographical origin of traditional fermented-salted vegetables by mass fingerprinting

Author

Listed:
  • So-Ra Yoon
  • Sung Hyun Kim
  • Hae-Won Lee
  • Ji-Hyoung Ha

Abstract

The geographical origin of kimchi is of interest to consumers and producers because the prices of commercial kimchi products can vary significantly according to the geographical origin. Hence, social issues related to the geographical origin of kimchi in Korea have emerged as a major problem. In this study, the geographical origin of kimchi was determined by comparing the mass fingerprints obtained for Korean and Chinese kimchi samples by MALDI-TOF MS with multivariate analysis. The results obtained herein provide an accurate, powerful tool to clearly discriminate kimchi samples based on their geographical origin within a short time and to ensure food authenticity, which is of significance in the kimchi industry. Furthermore, our MALDI-TOF MS method could be applied to determining the geographical origin of other fermented-salted vegetables at a reduced cost in shorter times.

Suggested Citation

  • So-Ra Yoon & Sung Hyun Kim & Hae-Won Lee & Ji-Hyoung Ha, 2017. "A novel method to rapidly distinguish the geographical origin of traditional fermented-salted vegetables by mass fingerprinting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188217
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188217
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188217&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0188217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimara, Efthalia & Skuras, Dimitris, 2003. "Adoption of agricultural innovations as a two-stage partial observability process," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 187-196, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wollni, Meike & Andersson, Camilla, 2014. "Spatial patterns of organic agriculture adoption: Evidence from Honduras," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 120-128.
    2. Aliou Diagne, 2012. "Adoption: a new Stata routine for estimating consistently population technological adoption parameters," SAN12 Stata Conference 17, Stata Users Group.
    3. Li, Bowei & Shen, Yueqin, 2021. "Effects of land transfer quality on the application of organic fertilizer by large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Shibia, Mumina Guyo, 2010. "Evaluation of Economic Losses in Rearing Replacement Heifers in Pastoral and Peri-Urban Camel Herds of Isiolo District, Kenya," Research Theses 134493, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    5. Dureti, Guyo Godana & Berha, Andu Nesrey, 2023. "Agro-clusters, market imperfections, and technology adoption in Ethiopia: exploring impacts and pathways," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 365919, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    6. Adjibai, Sourou T. Christian & Adegbola, Ygué Patrice & Yabi, Jacob A., 2023. "Impact of the adoption of sustainable land management technologies on allocative inefficiency of smallholder farmers: Evidence from North-East Benin," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 364849, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    7. Diagne, Aliou & Sogbossi, Marie-Josee & Simtowe, Franklin & Diawara, Sekou & Diallo, Abdoulaye Sadio & Barry, Alpha Bacar, 2009. "Estimation of Actual and potential adoption rates and determinants of a new technology not universally known in the population: The case of NERICA rice varieties in Guinea," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51644, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Bjerke, Lina & Johansson, Sara, 2022. "Innovation in agriculture: An analysis of Swedish agricultural and non-agricultural firms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Bonjean, Isabelle, "undated". "Heterogeneous Gains From Agricultural Innovation Adoption: The Role Of The Price Effect In Peru," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260891, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Shuhong Wang & Ning Yin & Zhihai Yang, 2021. "Factors affecting sustained adoption of irrigation water-saving technologies in groundwater over-exploited areas in the North China Plain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10528-10546, July.
    11. Mottaleb, Khondoker A., 2018. "Perception and adoption of a new agricultural technology: Evidence from a developing country," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 126-135.
    12. Luwen Cui & Weiwei Wang, 2023. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of Digital Technology by Farmers in China: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Baiyegunhi, L.J.S. & Hassan, M.B. & Danso-Abbeam, G. & Ortmann, G.F., 2019. "Diffusion and adoption of Integrated Striga Management (ISM) technologies among smallholder maize farmers in rural northern Nigeria," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 109-115.
    14. Yigezu, Yigezu A. & Tizale, Chilot Y. & Aw-Hassan, Aden, 2015. "Modeling Farmers’ Adoption Decisions of Multiple Crop Technologies: The Case of Barley and Potatoes in Ethiopia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211867, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Simtowe, Franklin & Kassie, Menale & Diagne, Aliou & Asfaw, Solomon & Shiferaw, Bekele & Silim, Said & Muange, Elijah, 2011. "Determinants of Agricultural Technology Adoption: The Case of Improved Pigeonpea Varieties in Tanzania," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 50(4), pages 1-21.
    16. Takashi Yamano & Maria Luz Malabayabas & Md. Ashraful Habib & Subrata Kumar Das, 2018. "Neighbors follow early adopters under stress: panel data analysis of submergence†tolerant rice in northern Bangladesh," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(3), pages 313-323, May.
    17. Meike Wollni & David R. Lee & Janice E. Thies, 2010. "Conservation agriculture, organic marketing, and collective action in the Honduran hillsides," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(3‐4), pages 373-384, May.
    18. Obubuafo, Joyce & Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & Paudel, Krishna P. & Kim, Seon-Ae, 2008. "Awareness of and Application to the Environmental Quality Incentives Program By Cow–Calf Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(01), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Wiredu, Alexander Nimo & Zeller, Manfred & Diagne, Aliou, 2015. "What Determines Adoption of Fertilizers among Rice-Producing Households in Northern Ghana?," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 54(3), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Fan Chen & Can Zhang & Wenna Wang & Hong Wei, 2023. "Internet use and higher farmer participation in domestic waste sorting: micro-survey data from 2126 farming households in rural China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.