IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0112147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Removal of Pulse Artefact from EEG Data Recorded in MR Environment at 3T. Setting of ICA Parameters for Marking Artefactual Components: Application to Resting-State Data

Author

Listed:
  • Eleonora Maggioni
  • Jorge Arrubla
  • Tracy Warbrick
  • Jürgen Dammers
  • Anna M Bianchi
  • Gianluigi Reni
  • Michela Tosetti
  • Irene Neuner
  • N Jon Shah

Abstract

Simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) allow for a non-invasive investigation of cerebral functions with high temporal and spatial resolution. The main challenge of such integration is the removal of the pulse artefact (PA) that affects EEG signals recorded in the magnetic resonance (MR) scanner. Often applied techniques for this purpose are Optimal Basis Set (OBS) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA). The combination of OBS and ICA is increasingly used, since it can potentially improve the correction performed by each technique separately. The present study is focused on the OBS-ICA combination and is aimed at providing the optimal ICA parameters for PA correction in resting-state EEG data, where the information of interest is not specified in latency and amplitude as in, for example, evoked potential. A comparison between two intervals for ICA calculation and four methods for marking artefactual components was performed. The performance of the methods was discussed in terms of their capability to 1) remove the artefact and 2) preserve the information of interest. The analysis included 12 subjects and two resting-state datasets for each of them. The results showed that none of the signal lengths for the ICA calculation was highly preferable to the other. Among the methods for the identification of PA-related components, the one based on the wavelets transform of each component emerged as the best compromise between the effectiveness in removing PA and the conservation of the physiological neuronal content.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleonora Maggioni & Jorge Arrubla & Tracy Warbrick & Jürgen Dammers & Anna M Bianchi & Gianluigi Reni & Michela Tosetti & Irene Neuner & N Jon Shah, 2014. "Removal of Pulse Artefact from EEG Data Recorded in MR Environment at 3T. Setting of ICA Parameters for Marking Artefactual Components: Application to Resting-State Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0112147
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112147
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112147&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0112147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikos K. Logothetis, 2008. "What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7197), pages 869-878, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Majer & Peter Mohr & Hauke Heekeren & Wolfgang Karl Härdle, 2014. "Portfolio Decisions and Brain Reactions via the CEAD method," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2014-036, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    2. Alejandro Morán & Miguel C Soriano, 2018. "Improving the quality of a collective signal in a consumer EEG headset," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Pérez-Centeno, Victor, 2018. "Brain-driven entrepreneurship research: Expanded review and research agenda towards entrepreneurial enhancement," Working Papers 02/18, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    4. Olsen, Carmen & Gold, Anna, 2018. "Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 127-141.
    5. Daniella Laureiro-Martínez & Stefano Brusoni & Nicola Canessa & Maurizio Zollo, 2015. "Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 319-338, March.
    6. John A Clithero & Dharol Tankersley & Scott A Huettel, 2008. "Foundations of Neuroeconomics: From Philosophy to Practice," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-6, November.
    7. Federico Rocchi & Carola Canella & Shahryar Noei & Daniel Gutierrez-Barragan & Ludovico Coletta & Alberto Galbusera & Alexia Stuefer & Stefano Vassanelli & Massimo Pasqualetti & Giuliano Iurilli & Ste, 2022. "Increased fMRI connectivity upon chemogenetic inhibition of the mouse prefrontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Hadi Vafaii & Francesca Mandino & Gabriel Desrosiers-Grégoire & David O’Connor & Marija Markicevic & Xilin Shen & Xinxin Ge & Peter Herman & Fahmeed Hyder & Xenophon Papademetris & Mallar Chakravarty , 2024. "Multimodal measures of spontaneous brain activity reveal both common and divergent patterns of cortical functional organization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Munro, Eileen & Musholt, Kristina, 2014. "Neuroscience and the risks of maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P1), pages 18-26.
    10. Macauley Smith Breault & Pierre Sacré & Zachary B. Fitzgerald & John T. Gale & Kathleen E. Cullen & Jorge A. González-Martínez & Sridevi V. Sarma, 2023. "Internal states as a source of subject-dependent movement variability are represented by large-scale brain networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Nicos Nicolaou & Phillip H. Phan & Ute Stephan, 2021. "The Biological Perspective in Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(1), pages 3-17, January.
    12. Eva R. Pool & Wolfgang M. Pauli & Logan Cross & John P. O’Doherty, 2023. "Neural substrates of parallel devaluation-sensitive and devaluation-insensitive Pavlovian learning in humans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Angelika Dimoka & Paul A. Pavlou & Fred D. Davis, 2011. "Research Commentary ---NeuroIS: The Potential of Cognitive Neuroscience for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 687-702, December.
    14. Domenic H. Cerri & Daniel L. Albaugh & Lindsay R. Walton & Brittany Katz & Tzu-Wen Wang & Tzu-Hao Harry Chao & Weiting Zhang & Randal J. Nonneman & Jing Jiang & Sung-Ho Lee & Amit Etkin & Catherine N., 2024. "Distinct neurochemical influences on fMRI response polarity in the striatum," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Wei Li & Miao Wang & Wen Wen & Yue Huang & Xi Chen & Wenliang Fan & The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2018. "Neural Dynamics during Resting State: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Exploration with Reduction and Visualization," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, June.
    16. Hubert, Mirja, 2010. "Does neuroeconomics give new impetus to economic and consumer research?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 812-817, October.
    17. Witt, Ulrich & Binder, Martin, 2013. "Disentangling motivational and experiential aspects of “utility” – A neuroeconomics perspective," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 27-40.
    18. Iana Markevych & Natasza Orlov & James Grellier & Katarzyna Kaczmarek-Majer & Małgorzata Lipowska & Katarzyna Sitnik-Warchulska & Yarema Mysak & Clemens Baumbach & Maja Wierzba-Łukaszyk & Munawar Huss, 2021. "NeuroSmog: Determining the Impact of Air Pollution on the Developing Brain: Project Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Jin Liu & Min Li & Yi Pan & Wei Lan & Ruiqing Zheng & Fang-Xiang Wu & Jianxin Wang, 2017. "Complex Brain Network Analysis and Its Applications to Brain Disorders: A Survey," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-27, October.
    20. Vaibhav A Diwadkar & Avisa Asemi & Ashley Burgess & Asadur Chowdury & Steven L Bressler, 2017. "Potentiation of motor sub-networks for motor control but not working memory: Interaction of dACC and SMA revealed by resting-state directed functional connectivity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0112147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.