IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0023946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calculation of Direct Antiretroviral Treatment Costs and Potential Cost Savings by Using Generics in the German HIV ClinSurv Cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Stoll
  • Christian Kollan
  • Frank Bergmann
  • Johannes Bogner
  • Gerd Faetkenheuer
  • Carlos Fritzsche
  • Kirsten Hoeper
  • Heinz-August Horst
  • Jan van Lunzen
  • Andreas Plettenberg
  • Stefan Reuter
  • Jürgen Rockstroh
  • Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink
  • Osamah Hamouda
  • Barbara Bartmeyer
  • and the ClinSurv Study Group

Abstract

Background/Aim of the Study: The study aimed to determine the cost impacts of antiretroviral drugs by analysing a long-term follow-up of direct costs for combined antiretroviral therapy, cART,-regimens in the nationwide long-term observational multi-centre German HIV ClinSurv Cohort. The second aim was to develop potential cost saving strategies by modelling different treatment scenarios. Methods: Antiretroviral regimens (ART) from 10,190 HIV-infected patients from 11 participating ClinSurv study centres have been investigated since 1996. Biannual data cART,-initiation, cART-changes, surrogate markers, clinical events and the Centre of Disease Control- (CDC)-stage of HIV disease are reported. Treatment duration was calculated on a daily basis via the documented dates for the beginning and end of each antiretroviral drug treatment. Prices were calculated for each individual regimen based on actual office sales prices of the branded pharmaceuticals distributed by the license holder including German taxes. Results: During the 13-year follow-up period, 21,387,427 treatment days were covered. Cumulative direct costs for antiretroviral drugs of €812,877,356 were determined according to an average of €42.08 per day (€7.52 to € 217.70). Since cART is widely used in Germany, the costs for an entire regimen increased by 13.5%. Regimens are more expensive in the advanced stages of HIV disease. The potential for cost savings was calculated using non-nucleotide-reverse-transcriptase-inhibitor, NNRTI, more frequently instead of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, PI/r, in first line therapy. This calculation revealed cumulative savings of 10.9% to 19.8% of daily treatment costs (50% and 90% substitution of PI/r, respectively). Substituting certain branded drugs by generic drugs showed potential cost savings of between 1.6% and 31.8%. Conclusions: Analysis of the data of this nationwide study reflects disease-specific health services research and will give insights into the cost impacts of antiretroviral therapy, and might allow a more rational allocation of resources within the German health care system.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Stoll & Christian Kollan & Frank Bergmann & Johannes Bogner & Gerd Faetkenheuer & Carlos Fritzsche & Kirsten Hoeper & Heinz-August Horst & Jan van Lunzen & Andreas Plettenberg & Stefan Reuter, 2011. "Calculation of Direct Antiretroviral Treatment Costs and Potential Cost Savings by Using Generics in the German HIV ClinSurv Cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0023946
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023946
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023946&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0023946?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boris Augurzky & Silja Göhlmann & Stefan Greß & Jürgen Wasem, 2009. "Effects of the German reference drug program on ex‐factory prices of prescription drugs: a panel data approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 421-436, April.
    2. John Rizzo & Richard Zeckhauser, 2009. "Generic script share and the price of brand-name drugs: the role of consumer choice," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 291-316, September.
    3. Stargardt, Tom & Schreyögg, Jonas & Busse, Reinhard, 2007. "Pricing behaviour of pharmacies after market deregulation for OTC drugs: The case of Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 30-38, November.
    4. J.-Matthias Schulenburg, 2005. "German health care system in transition," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 6(2), pages 183-187, June.
    5. Jörgen Hellström & Niklas Rudholm, 2004. "Side effects of generic competition?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 5(3), pages 203-208, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bate, Roger & Jin, Ginger Zhe & Mathur, Aparna, 2011. "Does price reveal poor-quality drugs? Evidence from 17 countries," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 1150-1163.
    2. Aysegul Timur & Gabriel Picone & Jeffrey DeSimone, 2011. "Has the European union achieved a single pharmaceutical market?," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 223-244, December.
    3. Stock, Stephanie Anja Katharina & Redaelli, Marcus & Lauterbach, Karl Wilhelm, 2007. "Disease management and health care reforms in Germany--Does more competition lead to less solidarity?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 86-96, January.
    4. Ricardo Arcaro & Cássia Rita Pereira da Veiga & Wesley Vieira da Silva & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga, 2021. "Attitude and Purchase Intention to Generic Drugs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Granlund, David & Rudholm, Niklas, 2008. "Consumer Loyalty in the Swedish Pharmaceuticals Market," HUI Working Papers 17, HUI Research.
    6. Angelo Corallo & Maria Elena Latino & Biagio Nuzzo & Fabrizio Striani, 2025. "Advertising increases demand for the equivalent drugs: a theoretical model," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(5), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Kanavos, Panos G. & Vandoros, Sotiris, 2011. "Determinants of branded prescription medicine prices in OECD countries," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 337-367, July.
    8. Reinhard Busse & Tom Stargardt & Jonas Schreyögg, 2005. "Determining the “Health Benefit Basket” of the Statutory Health Insurance scheme in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 6(1), pages 30-36, November.
    9. Jörgen Hellström & Niklas Rudholm, 2010. "Uncertainty in the generic versus brand name prescription decision," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 503-521, June.
    10. Herr, Annika, 2012. "Rationalisierung und Wettbewerb im Arzneimittelmarkt," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 31, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    11. Herr, Annika & Stühmeier, Torben & Wenzel, Tobias, 2014. "Reference pricing and cost-sharing: Theory and evidence on German off-patent drugs," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100556, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Suppliet, Moritz & Herr, Annika, 2016. "Cost-Sharing and Drug Pricing Strategies : Introducing Tiered Co-Payments in Reference Price Markets," Discussion Paper 2016-040, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Matteo Galizzi & Simone Ghislandi & Marisa Miraldo, 2011. "Effects of Reference Pricing in Pharmaceutical Markets," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 17-33, January.
    14. Annika Herr & Torben Stühmeier & Tobias Wenzel, 2023. "More cost‐sharing, less cost? Evidence on reference price drugs," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 413-435, February.
    15. Herr, A. & Suppliet, M., 2011. "Co-Payment Exemptions and Reference Prices: an Empirical Study of Pharmaceutical Prices in Germany," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 11/18, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    16. Izabela Jelovac, 2015. "On the relationship between the negotiated prices of pharmaceuticals and the patients' co-payment," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(1), pages 481-493.
    17. Vogler, Sabine & Habimana, Katharina & Arts, Danielle, 2014. "Does deregulation in community pharmacy impact accessibility of medicines, quality of pharmacy services and costs? Evidence from nine European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 311-327.
    18. Sabrina Terrizzi & Chad Meyerhoefer, 2020. "Estimates Of The Price Elasticity Of Switching Between Branded And Generic Drugs," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 38(1), pages 94-108, January.
    19. Andrea Cintolesi & Andrea Riganti, 2022. "Liberalizing the opening of new pharmacies and hospitalizations," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1388, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    20. Seema Kacker & Tin Aung & Dominic Montagu & David Bishai, 2021. "Providers preferences towards greater patient health benefit is associated with higher quality of care," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 271-294, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0023946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.