IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0015849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extending the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Assessing Consumer Attitudes Based on Multi-Dimensional Implicit Associations

Author

Listed:
  • Valentin Gattol
  • Maria Sääksjärvi
  • Claus-Christian Carbon

Abstract

Background: The authors present a procedural extension of the popular Implicit Association Test (IAT; [1]) that allows for indirect measurement of attitudes on multiple dimensions (e.g., safe–unsafe; young–old; innovative–conventional, etc.) rather than on a single evaluative dimension only (e.g., good–bad). Methodology/Principal Findings: In two within-subjects studies, attitudes toward three automobile brands were measured on six attribute dimensions. Emphasis was placed on evaluating the methodological appropriateness of the new procedure, providing strong evidence for its reliability, validity, and sensitivity. Conclusions/Significance: This new procedure yields detailed information on the multifaceted nature of brand associations that can add up to a more abstract overall attitude. Just as the IAT, its multi-dimensional extension/application (dubbed md-IAT) is suited for reliably measuring attitudes consumers may not be consciously aware of, able to express, or willing to share with the researcher [2], [3].

Suggested Citation

  • Valentin Gattol & Maria Sääksjärvi & Claus-Christian Carbon, 2011. "Extending the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Assessing Consumer Attitudes Based on Multi-Dimensional Implicit Associations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0015849
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0015849
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0015849&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0015849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keller, Kevin Lane, 2003. "Brand Synthesis: The Multidimensionality of Brand Knowledge," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 595-600, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jürg Hari & Elisabeth Pirsch & Heike Rawitzer, 2018. "Women are scaredy-cats and men are conquerors?," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 128-139, June.
    2. Anna Pecchinenda & Marco Bertamini & Alexis David James Makin & Nicole Ruta, 2014. "The Pleasantness of Visual Symmetry: Always, Never or Sometimes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berthon, Pierre & Pitt, Leyland F. & Campbell, Colin, 2009. "Does brand meaning exist in similarity or singularity?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 356-361, March.
    2. T. Tony Ke & Jiwoong Shin & Jungju Yu, 2023. "A Model of Product Portfolio Design: Guiding Consumer Search Through Brand Positioning," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1101-1124, November.
    3. Yi He & Qimei Chen & Dana L. Alden, 2016. "Time will tell: managing post-purchase changes in brand attitude," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 791-805, November.
    4. Teresa Barros & Paula Rodrigues & Nelson Duarte & Xue-Feng Shao & F. V. Martins & H. Barandas-Karl & Xiao-Guang Yue, 2020. "The Impact of Brand Relationships on Corporate Brand Identity and Reputation—An Integrative Model," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Romaniuk, Jenni & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda, 2016. "Lapsed buyers' durable brand consideration in emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3645-3651.
    7. Kalafatis, Stavros P. & Ledden, Lesley & Riley, Debra & Singh, Jaywant, 2016. "The added value of brand alliances in higher education," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3122-3132.
    8. Manizheh Bahreinizad & Majid Esmaeilpour & Kianoosh Moradi, 2020. "Brand Communications And Customer Equity: The Mediating Role Of Brand Knowledge And Word Of Mouth Ads," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 15(4), pages 90-103, december.
    9. Ella Ward & Song Yang & Jenni Romaniuk & Virginia Beal, 2020. "Building a unique brand identity: measuring the relative ownership potential of brand identity element types," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 393-407, July.
    10. Sandra Maria Correia Loureiro & Rui Lopes & Hans Ruediger Kaufmann, 2014. "How brand personality, brand identification and service quality influence service brand equity," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 1-1, October.
    11. Elvira Tabaku & Mirela Zerellari (Mersini), 2015. "Brand Loyalty And Loyalty Programs; A Literature Review," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 10(2), pages 71-86, June.
    12. Wong, Tommy & Wickham, Mark, 2015. "An examination of Marriott's entry into the Chinese hospitality industry: A Brand Equity perspective," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 439-454.
    13. Won‐Moo Hur & Hanna Kim & Joon Hyo Jang, 2016. "The Role of Gender Differences in the Impact of CSR Perceptions on Corporate Marketing Outcomes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 345-357, November.
    14. Yasir Ali Soomro & Muzzaffar Ali Issani & Shahzad Nasim, 2016. "Consumer Perceived Brand Concept & Close Brand Extension: A Multi-Mediation Model Analysis," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 12(1), pages 347-359.
    15. Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Romaniuk, Jenni, 2016. "Understanding premium private labels: A consumer categorisation approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 22-30.
    16. Julie Guidry Moulard & Randle D. Raggio & Judith Anne Garretson Folse, 2021. "Disentangling the meanings of brand authenticity: The entity-referent correspondence framework of authenticity," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 96-118, January.
    17. Veronica Gabrielli & Ilaria Baghi, 2019. "How to choose the endorser: An experimental analysis on the effects of fit and notoriety," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(4), pages 57-89.
    18. Silvia Blasi & Lorenzo & Silvia Rita Sedita, 2019. "Eco-friendliness and fashion perceptual attributes of fashion brands: an analysis of consumers’ perceptions based on Twitter data," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0237, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    19. Riefler, Petra, 2012. "Why consumers do (not) like global brands: The role of globalization attitude, GCO and global brand origin," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 25-34.
    20. Das, Gopal, 2014. "Factors affecting Indian shoppers׳ attitude and purchase intention: An empirical check," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 561-569.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0015849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.