IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0012809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prenatal Care Utilization for Mothers from Low-Income Areas of New Mexico, 1989–1999

Author

Listed:
  • Michael A Schillaci
  • Howard Waitzkin
  • E Ann Carson
  • Sandra J Romain

Abstract

Background: Prenatal care is considered to be an important component of primary health care. Our study compared prenatal care utilization and rates of adverse birth outcomes for mothers from low- and higher-income areas of New Mexico between 1989 and 1999. Methodology/Principal Findings: Prenatal care indicators included the number of prenatal care visits and the first month of prenatal care. Birth outcome indicators included low birth weight, premature birth, and births linked with death certificates. The results of our study indicated that mothers from low-income areas started their prenatal care significantly later in their pregnancies between 1989 and 1999, and had significantly fewer prenatal visits between 1989 and 1997. For the most part, there were not significant differences in birth outcome indicators between income groupings. Conclusions/Significance: These findings suggest that while mothers from low-income areas received lower levels of prenatal care, they did not experience a higher level of adverse birth outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael A Schillaci & Howard Waitzkin & E Ann Carson & Sandra J Romain, 2010. "Prenatal Care Utilization for Mothers from Low-Income Areas of New Mexico, 1989–1999," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-4, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0012809
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012809
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012809&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0012809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kotelchuck, M., 1994. "An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(9), pages 1414-1420.
    2. Waitzkin, H. & Williams, R.L. & Bock, J.A. & McCloskey, J. & Willging, C. & Wagner, W., 2002. "Safety-net institutions buffer the impact of medicaid managed care: A multi-method assessment in a rural state," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(4), pages 598-610.
    3. Karen Smith Conway & Andrea Kutinova, 2006. "Maternal health: does prenatal care make a difference?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 461-488, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji Yan, 2015. "The Earlier and the More, the Healthier? The Effects of Prenatal Care Utilization on Maternal Health and Health Behaviors," Working Papers 15-08, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    2. Ji Yan, 2017. "The Effects of Prenatal Care Utilization on Maternal Health and Health Behaviors," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(8), pages 1001-1018, August.
    3. Cygan-Rehm, Kamila & Karbownik, Krzysztof, 2022. "The effects of incentivizing early prenatal care on infant health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Petra Persson & Maya Rossin-Slater, 2018. "Family Ruptures, Stress, and the Mental Health of the Next Generation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(4-5), pages 1214-1252, April.
    5. Maxime Eslier & Catherine Deneux-Tharaux & Priscille Sauvegrain & Thomas Schmitz & Dominique Luton & Laurent Mandelbrot & Candice Estellat & Elie Azria, 2020. "Association between Migrant Women’s Legal Status and Prenatal Care Utilization in the PreCARE Cohort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Daniel Powers, 2013. "Paradox Revisited: A Further Investigation of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Infant Mortality by Maternal Age," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(2), pages 495-520, April.
    7. Robert Kaestner & Lisa Dubay & Genevieve Kenney, 2002. "Medicaid Managed Care and Infant Health: A National Evaluation," NBER Working Papers 8936, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Samuel H. Fishman & S. Philip Morgan & Robert A. Hummer, 2018. "Smoking and Variation in the Hispanic Paradox: A Comparison of Low Birthweight Across 33 US States," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 37(5), pages 795-824, October.
    9. Markowitz, Sara & Adams, E. Kathleen & Lewitt, Mary Jane & Dunlop, Anne L., 2017. "Competitive effects of scope of practice restrictions: Public health or public harm?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 201-218.
    10. Aparna Lhila & Kosali Simon, 2008. "Prenatal health investment decisions: Does the child’s sex matter?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(4), pages 885-905, November.
    11. Guldi, Melanie & Hamersma, Sarah, 2023. "The effects of pregnancy-related Medicaid expansions on maternal, infant, and child health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    12. Ahmed Shoukry Rashad & Mesbah Fathy Sharaf & Elhussien Ibrahim Mansour, 2019. "Does Public Health Insurance Increase Maternal Health Care Utilization in Egypt?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 516-520, August.
    13. Dhaval M. Dave & Muzhe Yang, 2022. "Maternal and fetal health effects of working during pregnancy," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 57-102, March.
    14. Lin, Chung-Liang, 2021. "Postpartum medical utilization: The role of prenatal economic activity and living costs," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    15. Qingyu Zhou & Qinwen Yu & Xin Wang & Peiwu Shi & Qunhong Shen & Zhaoyang Zhang & Zheng Chen & Chuan Pu & Lingzhong Xu & Zhi Hu & Anning Ma & Zhaohui Gong & Tianqiang Xu & Panshi Wang & Hua Wang & Chao, 2021. "Are Essential Women’s Healthcare Services Fully Covered? A Comparative Analysis of Policy Documents in Shanghai and New York City from 1978–2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Stijn Vansteelandt & Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2012. "Natural Direct and Indirect Effects on the Exposed: Effect Decomposition under Weaker Assumptions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1019-1027, December.
    17. Bertoli, Paola & Grembi, Veronica, 2021. "Territorial differences in access to prenatal care and health at birth," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(8), pages 1092-1099.
    18. Dubay, Lisa & Kaestner, Robert & Waidmann, Timothy, 2001. "Medical malpractice liability and its effect on prenatal care utilization and infant health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 591-611, July.
    19. Dhaval M. Dave & Robert Kaestner & George L. Wehby, 2015. "Does Medicaid Coverage for Pregnant Women Affect Prenatal Health Behaviors?," NBER Working Papers 21049, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Borrell, Luisa N. & Kodali, Hanish & Rodriguez-Alvarez, Elena, 2021. "Interracial/ethnic marriage and adverse birth outcomes: The effect of neighborhood racial/ethnic composition," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0012809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.