IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1004108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of birthweight centiles and early childhood development of singleton infants born from 37 weeks of gestation in Scotland: A population-based cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Abiodun Adanikin
  • Deborah A Lawlor
  • Jill P Pell
  • Scott M Nelson
  • Gordon C S Smith
  • Stamatina Iliodromiti

Abstract

Background: Birthweight centiles beyond the traditional thresholds for small or large babies are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes but there is a paucity of data about the relationship between birthweight centiles and childhood development among children born from 37 weeks of gestation. This study aims to establish the association between birthweight centiles across the whole distribution and early childhood development among children born from 37 weeks of gestation. Methods and findings: This is a population-based cohort study of 686,284 singleton infants born from 37 weeks of gestation. The cohort was generated by linking pregnancy and delivery data from the Scottish Morbidity Records (2003 to 2015) and the child developmental assessment at age 2 to 3.5 years. The main outcomes were child’s fine motor, gross motor, communication, and social developmental concerns measured with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires—3 (ASQ-3) and Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social & Emotional—2 (ASQ:SE-2), and for a subset of children with additional specialist tools such as the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) if the ASQ3/SE indicate these are necessary. The ASQ score for each domain was categorised as “concern” and “no concern.” Conclusions: We observed that from 37 weeks of gestation birthweight below the 25th centile was associated with child developmental concerns, with an association apparent at higher centiles above the conventional threshold defining small for gestational age (SGA, 3rd or 10th centile). Mild to moderate SGA is an unrecognised potentially important contributor to the prevalence of developmental concerns. Closer surveillance, appropriate parental counselling, and increased support during childhood may reduce the risks associated with lower birthweight centiles. In a population-based cohort study in Scotland, Abiodun Adanikin and colleagues study the association of birthweight centiles and motor, communication, and social developmental concerns identified at ages 2 to 3.5 years of age.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Abiodun Adanikin & Deborah A Lawlor & Jill P Pell & Scott M Nelson & Gordon C S Smith & Stamatina Iliodromiti, 2022. "Association of birthweight centiles and early childhood development of singleton infants born from 37 weeks of gestation in Scotland: A population-based cohort study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004108
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004108&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.