IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0002224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Species distribution modeling for disease ecology: A multi-scale case study for schistosomiasis host snails in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Alyson L Singleton
  • Caroline K Glidden
  • Andrew J Chamberlin
  • Roseli Tuan
  • Raquel G S Palasio
  • Adriano Pinter
  • Roberta L Caldeira
  • Cristiane L F Mendonça
  • Omar S Carvalho
  • Miguel V Monteiro
  • Tejas S Athni
  • Susanne H Sokolow
  • Erin A Mordecai
  • Giulio A De Leo

Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) are increasingly popular tools for profiling disease risk in ecology, particularly for infectious diseases of public health importance that include an obligate non-human host in their transmission cycle. SDMs can create high-resolution maps of host distribution across geographical scales, reflecting baseline risk of disease. However, as SDM computational methods have rapidly expanded, there are many outstanding methodological questions. Here we address key questions about SDM application, using schistosomiasis risk in Brazil as a case study. Schistosomiasis is transmitted to humans through contact with the free-living infectious stage of Schistosoma spp. parasites released from freshwater snails, the parasite’s obligate intermediate hosts. In this study, we compared snail SDM performance across machine learning (ML) approaches (MaxEnt, Random Forest, and Boosted Regression Trees), geographic extents (national, regional, and state), types of presence data (expert-collected and publicly-available), and snail species (Biomphalaria glabrata, B. straminea, and B. tenagophila). We used high-resolution (1km) climate, hydrology, land-use/land-cover (LULC), and soil property data to describe the snails’ ecological niche and evaluated models on multiple criteria. Although all ML approaches produced comparable spatially cross-validated performance metrics, their suitability maps showed major qualitative differences that required validation based on local expert knowledge. Additionally, our findings revealed varying importance of LULC and bioclimatic variables for different snail species at different spatial scales. Finally, we found that models using publicly-available data predicted snail distribution with comparable AUC values to models using expert-collected data. This work serves as an instructional guide to SDM methods that can be applied to a range of vector-borne and zoonotic diseases. In addition, it advances our understanding of the relevant environment and bioclimatic determinants of schistosomiasis risk in Brazil.

Suggested Citation

  • Alyson L Singleton & Caroline K Glidden & Andrew J Chamberlin & Roseli Tuan & Raquel G S Palasio & Adriano Pinter & Roberta L Caldeira & Cristiane L F Mendonça & Omar S Carvalho & Miguel V Monteiro & , 2024. "Species distribution modeling for disease ecology: A multi-scale case study for schistosomiasis host snails in Brazil," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002224
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002224
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002224&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.