IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0001711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanism design for a fair and equitable approach to global vaccine distribution: The case of COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Khaled Abedrabboh
  • Lolwa Al-Majid
  • Zaid Al-Fagih
  • Luluwah Al-Fagih

Abstract

Vaccines are one of the most effective tools humanity has in the fight against pandemics. One of the major challenges of vaccine distribution is achieving fair and equitable allocation across the countries of the world, regardless of their economic wealth. The self-interested behaviour of high-income countries and the underutilisation of vaccines allocated to underprepared countries are some of the failures reported during COVID-19 vaccine roll-out. These shortcomings have motivated the need for a central market mechanism that takes into account the countries’ vulnerability to COVID-19 and their readiness to distribute and administer their allocated vaccines. In this paper, we leverage game theory to study the problem of equitable global vaccine distribution and propose a fair market mechanism that aligns self-interested behaviour with optimal global objectives. First, we model the interaction between a central vaccine provider (e.g. COVAX) and a country reporting its demand as a two-player game, and discuss the Nash and mixed Nash equilibria of that game. Then, we propose a repeated auction mechanism with an artificial payment system for allocating vaccines among participating countries, where each auction round is based on a Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism. The proposed allocation mechanism aims at minimising deaths and incentivises the self-interested countries to report their demand truthfully. Compared with real-world COVAX allocation decisions, our results show that the proposed auction mechanism achieves more efficient outcomes that maximise the number of averted deaths. Pragmatic considerations are investigated and policy recommendations are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Khaled Abedrabboh & Lolwa Al-Majid & Zaid Al-Fagih & Luluwah Al-Fagih, 2023. "Mechanism design for a fair and equitable approach to global vaccine distribution: The case of COVID-19," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(12), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001711
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001711
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001711&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Y. Chen & Bruce L. Miller, 2009. "On the Relative Performance of Linear vs. Piecewise-Linear-Threshold Intertemporal Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(10), pages 1743-1752, October.
    2. Elodie Adida & Po-Ching DeLaurentis & Mark Lawley, 2011. "Hospital stockpiling for disaster planning," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 348-362.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ping Zhang & Hong Yan & King Wah Pang, 2019. "Inventory Sharing Strategy for Disposable Medical Items between Two Hospitals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Ubaid Illahi & Mohammad Shafi Mir, 2021. "Maintaining efficient logistics and supply chain management operations during and after coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: learning from the past experiences," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11157-11178, August.
    3. Chenxing Li & Xianliang Shi, 2024. "Supply Strategies and Business Model Options for Online Retailers of Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Coskun, Abdullah & Salman, F. Sibel & Pashapour, Amirreza, 2024. "Relief item inventory planning under centralized and decentralized bilateral cooperation and uncertain transshipment quantities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Shaoqing Geng & Yu Gong & Hanping Hou & Jianliang Yang & Bhakti Stephan Onggo, 2024. "Resource management in disaster relief: a bibliometric and content-analysis-based literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(1), pages 263-292, December.
    6. Sabbaghtorkan, Monir & Batta, Rajan & He, Qing, 2020. "Prepositioning of assets and supplies in disaster operations management: Review and research gap identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 1-19.
    7. Gerald Oeser & Pietro Romano, 2021. "Exploring risk pooling in hospitals to reduce demand and lead time uncertainty," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 78-94, June.
    8. Peiqiu Guan & Jun Zhuang, 2015. "Modeling Public–Private Partnerships in Disaster Management via Centralized and Decentralized Models," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 173-189, December.
    9. Bakó, Barna & Kálecz-Simon, András, 2013. "Quota bonuses with heterogeneous agents," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 316-320.
    10. Daniel Seaberg & Laura Devine & Jun Zhuang, 2017. "A review of game theory applications in natural disaster management research," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(3), pages 1461-1483, December.
    11. Gemma Berenguer & Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen, 2020. "OM Forum—Challenges and Strategies in Managing Nonprofit Operations: An Operations Management Perspective," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 888-905, September.
    12. Xinshang You & Shuo Zhao & Yanbo Yang & Dongli Zhang, 2022. "Influence of the Government Department on the Production Capacity Reserve of Emergency Enterprises Based on Multi-Scenario Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-35, November.
    13. Zhang, Weijian & Shi, Xianliang & Huang, Anqiang & Hua, Guowei & Teunter, Ruud H., 2023. "Optimal stock and capital reserve policies for emergency medical supplies against epidemic outbreaks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 183-191.
    14. M Denuit & L Eeckhoudt & O Jokung, 2013. "Non-differentiable transformations preserving stochastic dominance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(9), pages 1441-1446, September.
    15. Schleich, Benjamin Rafael & Seok, Hyesung & Yoon, Sang Won, 2017. "Performance assessment in homogeneous/heterogeneous collaborative enterprise networks with inventory adjustment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 958-970.
    16. Aarti Singh & Ratri Parida, 2022. "Decision-Making Models for Healthcare Supply Chain Disruptions: Review and Insights for Post-pandemic Era," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 130-141, December.
    17. Hanane Allioui & Azzeddine Allioui & Youssef Mourdi, 2024. "Maintaining effective logistics management during and after COVID‑19 pandemic: survey on the importance of artificial intelligence to enhance recovery strategies," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(2), pages 918-962, June.
    18. Choudhury, Nishat Alam & Ramkumar, M. & Schoenherr, Tobias & Singh, Shalabh, 2023. "The role of operations and supply chain management during epidemics and pandemics: Potential and future research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    19. Yilmaz, Ibrahim & Yoon, Sang Won, 2020. "Dynamic-distributed decisions and sharing protocol for fair resource sharing in collaborative network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    20. Khaled Abedrabboh & Matthias Pilz & Zaid Al-Fagih & Othman S Al-Fagih & Jean-Christophe Nebel & Luluwah Al-Fagih, 2021. "Game theory to enhance stock management of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 outbreak," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.