IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applied artificial intelligence for global child health: Addressing biases and barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Vijaytha Muralidharan
  • Joel Schamroth
  • Alaa Youssef
  • Leo A Celi
  • Roxana Daneshjou

Abstract

Given the potential benefits of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) within healthcare, it is critical to consider how these technologies can be deployed in pediatric research and practice. Currently, healthcare AI/ML has not yet adapted to the specific technical considerations related to pediatric data nor adequately addressed the specific vulnerabilities of children and young people (CYP) in relation to AI. While the greatest burden of disease in CYP is firmly concentrated in lower and middle-income countries (LMICs), existing applied pediatric AI/ML efforts are concentrated in a small number of high-income countries (HICs). In LMICs, use-cases remain primarily in the proof-of-concept stage. This narrative review identifies a number of intersecting challenges that pose barriers to effective AI/ML for CYP globally and explores the shifts needed to make progress across multiple domains. Child-specific technical considerations throughout the AI/ML lifecycle have been largely overlooked thus far, yet these can be critical to model effectiveness. Governance concerns are paramount, with suitable national and international frameworks and guidance required to enable the safe and responsible deployment of advanced technologies impacting the care of CYP and using their data. An ambitious vision for child health demands that the potential benefits of AI/Ml are realized universally through greater international collaboration, capacity building, strong oversight, and ultimately diffusing the AI/ML locus of power to empower researchers and clinicians globally. In order that AI/ML systems that do not exacerbate inequalities in pediatric care, teams researching and developing these technologies in LMICs must ensure that AI/ML research is inclusive of the needs and concerns of CYP and their caregivers. A broad, interdisciplinary, and human-centered approach to AI/ML is essential for developing tools for healthcare workers delivering care, such that the creation and deployment of ML is grounded in local systems, cultures, and clinical practice. Decisions to invest in developing and testing pediatric AI/ML in resource-constrained settings must always be part of a broader evaluation of the overall needs of a healthcare system, considering the critical building blocks underpinning effective, sustainable, and cost-efficient healthcare delivery for CYP.

Suggested Citation

  • Vijaytha Muralidharan & Joel Schamroth & Alaa Youssef & Leo A Celi & Roxana Daneshjou, 2024. "Applied artificial intelligence for global child health: Addressing biases and barriers," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000583
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000583
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000583&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morley, Jessica & Machado, Caio C.V. & Burr, Christopher & Cowls, Josh & Joshi, Indra & Taddeo, Mariarosaria & Floridi, Luciano, 2020. "The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamid Reza Saeidnia & Seyed Ghasem Hashemi Fotami & Brady Lund & Nasrin Ghiasi, 2024. "Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence Interventions for Mental Health and Well-Being: Ensuring Responsible Implementation and Impact," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Alexandra Brintrup & George Baryannis & Ashutosh Tiwari & Svetan Ratchev & Giovanna Martinez-Arellano & Jatinder Singh, 2023. "Trustworthy, responsible, ethical AI in manufacturing and supply chains: synthesis and emerging research questions," Papers 2305.11581, arXiv.org.
    3. Bennett, Jeffrey A. & Simpson, Juliet G. & Qin, Chao & Fittro, Roger & Koenig, Gary M. & Clarens, Andres F. & Loth, Eric, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of offshore isothermal compressed air energy storage in saline aquifers co-located with wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    4. Shipton, Leah & Vitale, Lucia, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the politics of avoidance in global health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    5. Cristina Trocin & Patrick Mikalef & Zacharoula Papamitsiou & Kieran Conboy, 2023. "Responsible AI for Digital Health: a Synthesis and a Research Agenda," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 2139-2157, December.
    6. Liberty D Mudzengerere & Shelter Machingura & Kudakwashe Munyepwa & Memory Matsikure Cheure & Allen mutumwa & Denny Chakauya & Tafadzwa Mudadi, 2025. "Investigating The Role of Internal Audtior’s Attributes in Preventing and Detecting Fraud in Business Organisations. A Case Study of Smes in Mutare Showground," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(2), pages 727-770, February.
    7. Siala, Haytham & Wang, Yichuan, 2022. "SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    8. Sanchaita Hazra & Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder & Tuhin Chakrabarty, 2025. "AI Safety Should Prioritize the Future of Work," Papers 2504.13959, arXiv.org.
    9. Castonguay, Alexandre & Wagner, Gerit & Motulsky, Aude & Paré, Guy, 2024. "AI maturity in health care: An overview of 10 OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. Kusta, Olsi & Bearman, Margaret & Gorur, Radhika & Risør, Torsten & Brodersen, John Brandt & Hoeyer, Klaus, 2024. "Speed, accuracy, and efficiency: The promises and practices of digitization in pathology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    11. Kanungo, Rama Prasad & Liu, Rui & Gupta, Suraksha, 2024. "Cognitive analytics enabled responsible artificial intelligence for business model innovation: A multilayer perceptron neural networks estimation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Markov, Iliya & Guglielmetti, Rafael & Laumanns, Marco & Fernández-Antolín, Anna & de Souza, Ravin, 2021. "Simulation-based design and analysis of on-demand mobility services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 170-205.
    13. Clement A. Adebamowo & Shawneequa Callier & Simisola Akintola & Oluchi Maduka & Ayodele Jegede & Christopher Arima & Temidayo Ogundiran & Sally N. Adebamowo, 2023. "The promise of data science for health research in Africa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    14. Wang, Weisha & Wang, Yichuan & Chen, Long & Ma, Rui & Zhang, Minhao, 2024. "Justice at the Forefront: Cultivating felt accountability towards Artificial Intelligence among healthcare professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.