IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring factors affecting the adoption and continuance usage of drone in healthcare: The role of the environment

Author

Listed:
  • John Serbe Marfo
  • Kwadwo Kyeremeh
  • Pasty Asamoah
  • Matilda Kokui Owusu-Bio
  • Afia Frimpomaa Asare Marfo

Abstract

Drone technologies and healthcare delivery have attracted scholarly attention over the years. Studies have acknowledged the positive impact of the adoption and usage of drone technologies for healthcare delivery. We argue however that, knowledge is lacking on the role of the environment in drone technologies adoption, usage and continuance usage. An examination of 330 health facilities that engage in the use of drone services from Zipline Ghana showed that the environment inversely moderates the relationship between actual usage and intention to continue usage, suggesting that reducing the influence of environmental factors will increase the impact actual usage has on the continuance usage of drone technology in healthcare delivery.Author summary: Our comprehensive study delves into the intriguing intersection of drone technology and healthcare delivery, an area of significant scholarly interest. Our research addresses a critical knowledge gap by investigating how environmental factors influence the adoption and ongoing use of drone technology in healthcare. Through an extensive analysis involving 330 healthcare facilities, with Zipline Ghana as a prominent example, we reveal an insightful relationship. We contend that the environment plays a pivotal role in moderating the link between actual drone usage and the intention to continue using this technology for healthcare purposes. Our findings indicate that reducing the impact of environmental factors can substantially increase the influence of actual usage on sustained drone technology utilization in healthcare delivery. Our research not only contributes to the ongoing discourse on drones in healthcare but also emphasizes the importance of considering environmental variables in shaping the adoption and continued utilization of such technology. We anticipate that our findings will inform policymakers, healthcare professionals, and stakeholders, promoting the more effective integration of drones to enhance healthcare delivery, benefiting both scientific and non-scientific audiences.

Suggested Citation

  • John Serbe Marfo & Kwadwo Kyeremeh & Pasty Asamoah & Matilda Kokui Owusu-Bio & Afia Frimpomaa Asare Marfo, 2023. "Exploring factors affecting the adoption and continuance usage of drone in healthcare: The role of the environment," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000266
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000266
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000266&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lulua Bahrainwala & Astrid M Knoblauch & Andry Andriamiadanarivo & Mohamed Mustafa Diab & Jesse McKinney & Peter M Small & James G Kahn & Elizabeth Fair & Niaina Rakotosamimanana & Simon Grandjean Lap, 2020. "Drones and digital adherence monitoring for community-based tuberculosis control in remote Madagascar: A cost-effectiveness analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Vasileios Nittas & Chiara Zecca & Christian P Kamm & Jens Kuhle & Andrew Chan & Viktor von Wyl, 2023. "Digital health for chronic disease management: An exploratory method to investigating technology adoption potential," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Liao, Chechen & Palvia, Prashant & Chen, Jain-Liang, 2009. "Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a Technology Continuance Theory (TCT)," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 309-320.
    4. Premkumar, G. & Bhattacherjee, Anol, 2008. "Explaining information technology usage: A test of competing models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 64-75, February.
    5. José Manuel Peña & Jorge Torres-Sánchez & Ana Isabel de Castro & Maggi Kelly & Francisca López-Granados, 2013. "Weed Mapping in Early-Season Maize Fields Using Object-Based Analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Images," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-1, October.
    6. Chiara Cannavale & Lorenza Claudio & Michele Simoni, 2021. "How social innovations spread globally through the process of reverse innovation: a case-study from the South Korea," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2021(4), pages 421-440, December.
    7. Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Davidson, Rosemary & Bicket, Martha & Whitmarsh, Lorraine, 2013. "Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 363-374.
    8. Aoshuang Li & Yongqiang Sun & Xiaodong Yang & Jinyu Guo, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Perceived Ease of Use and Continuance Usage of a Mobile Terminal: Mobility as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    9. M C Jones & R C Beatty, 1998. "Towards the development of measures of perceived benefits and compatibility of EDI: a comparative assessment of competing first order factor models," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 210-220, September.
    10. Imdadullah Hidayat-ur-Rehman & Muhammad Shakaib Akram & Aneela Malik & Shamsul A. Mokhtar & Zeeshan Ahmed Bhatti & Muhammad Asif Khan, 2020. "Exploring the Determinants of Digital Content Adoption By Academics: The Moderating Role of Environmental Concerns and Price Value," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes & Tiago Trancoso, 2025. "Aerial pathways to resilience: the acceptance of drones in logistics transformation," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicole D. Sintov & P. Wesley Schultz, 2017. "Adjustable Green Defaults Can Help Make Smart Homes More Sustainable," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Dr. Abdinasir Ismael Hashi, 2025. "The Impact of Mobile Money Transfer in Somalia," Journal of Technology and Systems, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 30-46.
    3. Mary D. Adu & Usman H. Malabu & Aduli E. O. Malau-Aduli & Aaron Drovandi & Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli, 2020. "Efficacy and Acceptability of My Care Hub Mobile App to Support Self-Management in Australians with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Xu, Xiaojing & Chen, Chien-fei & Zhu, Xiaojuan & Hu, Qinran, 2018. "Promoting acceptance of direct load control programs in the United States: Financial incentive versus control option," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1278-1287.
    5. Chamaret, Cécile & Steyer, Véronique & Mayer, Julie C., 2020. "“Hands off my meter!” when municipalities resist smart meters: Linking arguments and degrees of resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Samer Ali Al-shami & Salem Aldahmani & Massila Kamalrudin & Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammed Al-shami & Mustafa Musa Jaber, 2022. "A Model of Motivational and Technological Factors Influencing Massive Open Online Courses’ Continuous Intention to Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Ting Mei & Hui Liu & Bingrui Tong & Chaozhen Tong & Junjie Zhu & Yuxuan Wang & Mengyao Kou, 2025. "Exploring Knowledge Domain of Intelligent Safety and Security Studies by Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Katrien Luijkx & Leonieke van Boekel & Meriam Janssen & Marjolein Verbiest & Annerieke Stoop, 2020. "The Academic Collaborative Center Older Adults: A Description of Co-Creation between Science, Care Practice and Education with the Aim to Contribute to Person-Centered Care for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Younjoo Cho & Anseop Choi, 2020. "Application of Affordance Factors for User-Centered Smart Homes: A Case Study Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    10. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Song, Wenyan, 2022. "Identifying critical factors in systems with interrelated components: A method considering heterogeneous influence and strength attenuation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 456-470.
    11. Su-Chen(Cecilia) Lin & Mei-Chen Chuang & Chen-Yuan Huang & Chia-En Liu, 2023. "Nursing Staff’s Behavior Intention to Use Mobile Technology: An Exploratory Study Employing the UTAUT 2 Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    12. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2017. "Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: A review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 14-33.
    13. Tu, Gengyang & Faure, Corinne & Schleich, Joachim & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte, 2021. "The heat is off! The role of technology attributes and individual attitudes in the diffusion of Smart thermostats – findings from a multi-country survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Oghuma, Apollos Patricks & Chang, Younghoon & Libaque-Saenz, Christian Fernando & Park, Myeong-Cheol & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2015. "Benefit-confirmation model for post-adoption behavior of mobile instant messaging applications: A comparative analysis of KakaoTalk and Joyn in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 658-677.
    15. Łukasz Brzeziński & Magdalena Krystyna Wyrwicka, 2022. "Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-52, November.
    16. Attour, Amel & Baudino, Marco & Krafft, Jackie & Lazaric, Nathalie, 2020. "Determinants of energy tracking application use at the city level: Evidence from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Hermano, Víctor & Martín-Cruz, Natalia, 2016. "The role of top management involvement in firms performing projects: A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3447-3458.
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0135328 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Su-Yen Chen & Chiachun Lee, 2019. "Perceptions of the Impact of High-Level-Machine-Intelligence from University Students in Taiwan: The Case for Human Professions, Autonomous Vehicles, and Smart Homes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Birgul Basarir-Ozel & Hande Bahar Turker & Vesile Aslihan Nasir, 2022. "Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    21. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.