IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pclm00/0000175.html

Climate action in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Sabrina McCormick
  • Annette Aldous
  • Laurilee Yarbrough

Abstract

Individuals can act to mitigate climate change and its consequences by changing their own behavior, working with others to address community issues, or advocating for government action. However, little is known about what people are doing or the factors shaping their engagement. We surveyed 741 respondents in the United States to understand their current beliefs, motivations, and behaviors related to climate action. Our respondents report frequently taking everyday actions, such as talking to others about climate change and buying climate friendly products with less frequent, but still higher than expected, advocacy-oriented actions like signing petitions or contacting representatives. We find wide agreement on the importance of government action and the need for government to hear people’s concerns, with more variability in the importance assigned to community and individual actions. Lack of access to resources, social support, or fun approaches to addressing climate change represent obstacles to further action.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabrina McCormick & Annette Aldous & Laurilee Yarbrough, 2023. "Climate action in the United States," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(9), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000175
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000175
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000175&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Corner & Ezra Markowitz & Nick Pidgeon, 2014. "Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3), pages 411-422, May.
    2. repec:sae:envval:v:26:y:2017:i:2:p:131-155 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Salil D. Benegal & Lyle A. Scruggs, 2018. "Correcting misinformation about climate change: the impact of partisanship in an experimental setting," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 61-80, May.
    4. Fielding, Kelly S. & van Kasteren, Yasmin & Louis, Winnifred & McKenna, Bernard & Russell, Sally & Spinks, Anneliese, 2016. "Using individual householder survey responses to predict household environmental outcomes: The cases of recycling and water conservation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 90-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kathie M. d'I. Treen & Hywel T. P. Williams & Saffron J. O'Neill, 2020. "Online misinformation about climate change," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    2. Abinash Bhattachan & Matthew D. Jurjonas & Priscilla R. Morris & Paul J. Taillie & Lindsey S. Smart & Ryan E. Emanuel & Erin L. Seekamp, 2019. "Linking residential saltwater intrusion risk perceptions to physical exposure of climate change impacts in rural coastal communities of North Carolina," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(3), pages 1277-1295, July.
    3. Dylan Bugden & Jesse Brazil, 2024. "The role of geostrategic interests in motivating public support for foreign climate aid," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 803-813, December.
    4. Marijn H. C. Meijers & Christin Scholz & Ragnheiður “Heather” Torfadóttir & Anke Wonneberger & Marko Markov, 2022. "Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic to combat climate change: comparing drivers of individual action in global crises," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 272-282, June.
    5. Finlay Malcolm & Peter Manley Scott, 2025. "The ecotheological values of Christian climate change activists," Environmental Values, , vol. 34(2), pages 167-189, April.
    6. Rita Zarbo & Stefania Lucia Buccheri & Calogero Iacolino & Paola Magnano & Maria Guarnera, 2026. "Assuming risks in sustainable behaviours: the role of subjective risk intelligence and prosociality," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 16(1), pages 87-99, March.
    7. Osberg, Gustav & Schulz, Felix & Bretter, Christian, 2024. "Navigating sustainable futures: The role of terminal and instrumental values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    8. Wang, Aijia & Mah, Daphne Ngar-yin, 2026. "A systematic review on varieties, effectiveness and determinants of consumer engagement in the context of electricity market reforms from a European-Asian comparative perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PD).
    9. López, Iván & Sanagustín-Fons, Victoria & Moseñe Fierro, José A., 2026. "Social perception of renewable energies: barriers and opportunities for an inclusive energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    10. Monique Holowach & John R Parkins, 2025. "Unraveling the link between political polarization and wind energy perspectives: Insights from a survey of agricultural landowners in Alberta, Canada," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(4), pages 1696-1713, June.
    11. Monika Pompeo & Nina Serdarevic, 2021. "Is information enough? The case of Republicans and climate change," Discussion Papers 2021-08, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    12. Ann Foss, 2018. "Divergent responses to sustainability and climate change planning: The role of politics, cultural frames and public participation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(2), pages 332-348, February.
    13. Rosalind Pidcock & Kate Heath & Lydia Messling & Susie Wang & Anna Pirani & Sarah Connors & Adam Corner & Christopher Shaw & Melissa Gomis, 2021. "Evaluating effective public engagement: local stories from a global network of IPCC scientists," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Stéphane Hallegatte & Catrina Godinho & Jun Rentschler & Paolo Avner & Ira Irina Dorband & Camilla Knudsen & Jana Lemke & Penny Mealy, 2023. "Within Reach," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 40601, April.
    15. Joshua Ettinger & Peter Walton & James Painter & Thomas DiBlasi, 2021. "Climate of hope or doom and gloom? Testing the climate change hope vs. fear communications debate through online videos," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-19, January.
    16. C. William Young & Sally V. Russell & Cheryl A. Robinson & Phani Kumar Chintakayala, 2018. "Sustainable Retailing – Influencing Consumer Behaviour on Food Waste," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 1-15, January.
    17. D. Liliana González-Hernández & Raúl A. Aguirre-Gamboa & Erik W. Meijles, 2023. "The role of climate change perceptions and sociodemographics on reported mitigation efforts and performance among households in northeastern Mexico," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1853-1875, February.
    18. Yilmaz, Selin & Cuony, Peter & Chanez, Cédric & Patel, Martin Kumar, 2024. "Communication strategies and consumer acceptance of utility-controlled heat pumps and electric vehicles," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Gabriel Miao Li & Josh Pasek & Jon A. Krosnick & Tobias H. Stark & Jennifer Agiesta & Gaurav Sood & Trevor Tompson & Wendy Gross, 2022. "Americans’ Attitudes toward the Affordable Care Act: What Role Do Beliefs Play?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 700(1), pages 41-54, March.
    20. Salil D. Benegal & Mirya R. Holman, 2021. "Racial prejudice, education, and views of climate change," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1907-1919, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.