Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008863
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Mikael Sunnåker & Alberto Giovanni Busetto & Elina Numminen & Jukka Corander & Matthieu Foll & Christophe Dessimoz, 2013. "Approximate Bayesian Computation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
- Sebastian Gluth & Nadja Kern & Maria Kortmann & Cécile L. Vitali, 2020. "Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 634-645, June.
- Thomas, Armin W. & Molter, Felix & Krajbich, Ian & Heekeren, Hauke R. & Mohr, Peter N. C., 2019. "Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3(6), pages 625-635.
- Thomas C Cassey & David R Evens & Rafal Bogacz & James A R Marshall & Casimir J H Ludwig, 2013. "Adaptive Sampling of Information in Perceptual Decision-Making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, November.
- Xavier Gabaix & David Laibson & Guillermo Moloche & Stephen Weinberg, 2006. "Costly Information Acquisition: Experimental Analysis of a Boundedly Rational Model," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(4), pages 1043-1068, September.
- Andrew Caplin & Mark Dean, 2013. "Behavioral Implications of Rational Inattention with Shannon Entropy," NBER Working Papers 19318, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Bas van Opheusden & Luigi Acerbi & Wei Ji Ma, 2020. "Unbiased and efficient log-likelihood estimation with inverse binomial sampling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-32, December.
- Benjamin Hébert & Michael Woodford, 2017. "Rational Inattention and Sequential Information Sampling," NBER Working Papers 23787, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Daniel McFadden, 2001.
"Economic Choices,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 351-378, June.
- McFadden, Daniel L., 2000. "Economic Choices," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2000-6, Nobel Prize Committee.
- Hebert, Benjamin & Woodford, Michael, 2017.
"Rational Inattention with Sequential Information Sampling,"
Research Papers
repec:ecl:stabus:3457, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
- Hebert, Benjamin & Woodford, Michael, 2018. "Rational Inattention with Continuous Time," Research Papers 3457, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
- Hébert, Benjamin & Woodford, Michael, 2023.
"Rational inattention when decisions take time,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
- Benjamin M. Hébert & Michael Woodford, 2019. "Rational Inattention when Decisions Take Time," NBER Working Papers 26415, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Savannah Wei Shi & Michel Wedel & F. G. M. (Rik) Pieters, 2013. "Information Acquisition During Online Decision Making: A Model-Based Exploration Using Eye-Tracking Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1009-1026, May.
- Jiri Najemnik & Wilson S. Geisler, 2005. "Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7031), pages 387-391, March.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:396-403 is not listed on IDEAS
- Satohiro Tajima & Jan Drugowitsch & Alexandre Pouget, 2016. "Optimal policy for value-based decision-making," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, November.
- Romy Frömer & Carolyn K. Dean Wolf & Amitai Shenhav, 2019. "Goal congruency dominates reward value in accounting for behavioral and neural correlates of value-based decision-making," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
- Armin W. Thomas & Felix Molter & Ian Krajbich & Hauke R. Heekeren & Peter N. C. Mohr, 2019. "Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(6), pages 625-635, June.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:5:y:2010:i:6:p:437-449 is not listed on IDEAS
- K. Carrie Armel & Antonio Rangel, 2008. "The Impact of Computation Time and Experience on Decision Values," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(2), pages 163-168, May.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- repec:jdm:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:6:p:1287-1312 is not listed on IDEAS
- Michel Wedel & Rik Pieters & Ralf Lans, 2023. "Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 697-729, June.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:6:p:1287-1312 is not listed on IDEAS
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Michel Wedel & Rik Pieters & Ralf Lans, 2023. "Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 697-729, June.
- Moshe Glickman & Orian Sharoni & Dino J Levy & Ernst Niebur & Veit Stuphorn & Marius Usher, 2019. "The formation of preference in risky choice," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, August.
- Matveenko, Andrei & Starkov, Egor, 2023.
"Sparking curiosity or tipping the scales? Targeted advertising with consumer learning,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 172-192.
- Andrei Matveenko & Egor Starkov, 2023. "Sparking curiosity or tipping the scales? Targeted advertising with consumer learning," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2023_425, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Fischbacher, Urs & Hausfeld, Jan & Renerte, Baiba, 2022.
"Strategic incentives undermine gaze as a signal of prosocial motives,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 63-91.
- Urs Fischbacher & Jan Hausfeld & Baiba Renerte, 2020. "Strategic incentives undermine gaze as a signal of prosocial motives," TWI Research Paper Series 120, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
- Benjamin Hébert & Michael Woodford, 2018.
"Information Costs and Sequential Information Sampling,"
NBER Working Papers
25316, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hebert, Benjamin & Woodford, Michael, 2018. "Information Costs and Sequential Information Sampling," Research Papers 3751, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
- Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2021. "Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
- Benjamin Hébert & Michael Woodford, 2021.
"Neighborhood-Based Information Costs,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(10), pages 3225-3255, October.
- Benjamin M. Hébert & Michael Woodford, 2020. "Neighborhood-Based Information Costs," NBER Working Papers 26743, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gaglianone, Wagner Piazza & Giacomini, Raffaella & Issler, João Victor & Skreta, Vasiliki, 2022.
"Incentive-driven inattention,"
Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 188-212.
- Wagner Piazza Gaglianone & Raffaella Giacomini & João Victor Issler & Vasiliki Skreta, 2018. "Incentive-driven Inattention," Working Papers Series 485, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
- Gaglianone, Wagner Piazza & Giacomini, Raffaella & Issler, João Victor & Skreta, Vasiliki, 2019. "Incentive-driven Inattention," FGV EPGE Economics Working Papers (Ensaios Economicos da EPGE) 811, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil).
- Skreta, Vasiliki & Giacomini, Raffaella & Gaglianone, Wagner & Issler, Joao, 2019. "Incentive-driven Inattention," CEPR Discussion Papers 13619, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2019. "Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?," MPRA Paper 93126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2020. "An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?," MPRA Paper 99417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Weijie Zhong, 2018. "The Indirect Cost of Information," Papers 1809.00697, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
- Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Samek, Anya & Hur, Inkyoung & Kim, Sung-Hee & Yi, Ji Soo, 2016.
"An experimental study of the decision process with interactive technology,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 20-32.
- Inkyoung Hur & Sung-Hee Kim & Anya Samek & Ji Soo Yi, 2015. "An Experimental Study of Decision Process with Interactive Technology," Artefactual Field Experiments 00427, The Field Experiments Website.
- Bartosz Maćkowiak & Filip Matějka & Mirko Wiederholt, 2023.
"Rational Inattention: A Review,"
Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 226-273, March.
- Mackowiak, Bartosz & Matějka, Filip & Wiederholt, Mirko, 2020. "Rational Inattention: A Review," CEPR Discussion Papers 15408, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Bartosz Maćkowiak & Filip Matějka & Mirko Wiederholt, 2023. "Rational Inattention: A Review," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03878692, HAL.
- Maćkowiak, Bartosz & Matějka, Filip & Wiederholt, Mirko, 2021. "Rational inattention: a review," Working Paper Series 2570, European Central Bank.
- Bartosz Maćkowiak & Filip Matějka & Mirko Wiederholt, 2023. "Rational Inattention: A Review," Post-Print hal-03878692, HAL.
- Hébert, Benjamin & Woodford, Michael, 2023.
"Rational inattention when decisions take time,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
- Benjamin M. Hébert & Michael Woodford, 2019. "Rational Inattention when Decisions Take Time," NBER Working Papers 26415, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hu, Yingyao & Kayaba, Yutaka & Shum, Matthew, 2013.
"Nonparametric learning rules from bandit experiments: The eyes have it!,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 215-231.
- Yingyao Hu & Yutaka Kayaba & Matthew Shum, 2010. "Nonparametric learning rules from bandit experiments: the eyes have it!," CeMMAP working papers CWP15/10, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Yingyao Hu & Yutaka Kayaba & Matt Shum, 2010. "Nonparametric Learning Rules from Bandit Experiments: The Eyes have it!," Economics Working Paper Archive 560, The Johns Hopkins University,Department of Economics.
- Roc Armenter & Michèle Müller-Itten & Zachary Stangebye, 2020.
"Rational Inattention via Ignorance Equivalence,"
Working Papers
20-24, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
- Roc Armenter & Michèle Müller-Itten & Zachary Strangebye, 2021. "Rational Inattention via Ignorance Equivalence," Working Papers 21-29, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
- David Walker-Jones, 2019. "Rational Inattention and Perceptual Distance," Papers 1909.00888, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2021.
"Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(6), pages 1828-1877.
- Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Fehr, Ernst & Netzer, Nick, 2021. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 129(6), pages 1828-1877.
- Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Fehr, Ernst & Netzer, Nick, 2018. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy," IZA Discussion Papers 11918, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy," ECON - Working Papers 306, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jun 2020.
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences when Choices Are Noisy," CESifo Working Paper Series 7333, CESifo.
- Carlos Alos-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time will tell - Recovering Preferences when Choices are Noisy," Papers 1811.02497, arXiv.org.
- Altmann, Steffen & Grunewald, Andreas & Radbruch, Jonas, 2019. "Passive Choices and Cognitive Spillovers," IZA Discussion Papers 12337, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.