IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pcz/journl/v13y2016i1p206-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Model Of Public Management In Science Financing In Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana Evgenievna Ushakova

    (Russian Scientific Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

  • Alexander Borisovich Gusev

    (Russian Scientific Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

  • Ivan Vladimirovich Vershinin

    (Russian Scientific Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

  • Alexey Mikhaylovich Kornilov

    (Russian Scientific Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology)

Abstract

The article describes current world trends in attempts to solve the problem of linking of remuneration for scientific work to its effectiveness; in particular the attempt to transfer the principles of the concept of New Public Management in the sphere of science funding is investigated. The article presents the analysis of results of the new public management model implementation in financing of Russian research organizations using the tools of econometric benchmarking. The analysis leads to the conclusion about the existence of the conceptual limitations of benchmarking and performance management applicability to the research and development sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana Evgenievna Ushakova & Alexander Borisovich Gusev & Ivan Vladimirovich Vershinin & Alexey Mikhaylovich Kornilov, 2016. "A New Model Of Public Management In Science Financing In Russia," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 13(1), pages 206-216, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:206-216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pjms.zim.pcz.pl/PDF/PJMS131/A%20New%20Model%20of%20Public%20Management%20in%20Science%20Financing%20in%20Russia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://pjms.zim.pcz.pl/-articles-13.1.php
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pollitt, Michael, 2009. "Evaluating the evidence on electricity reform: Lessons for the South East Europe (SEE) market," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 13-23, March.
    2. Gunnar Öquist & Mats Benner, 2015. "Why Are Some Nations More Successful Than Others in Research Impact? A Comparison Between Denmark and Sweden," Springer Books, in: Isabell M. Welpe & Jutta Wollersheim & Stefanie Ringelhan & Margit Osterloh (ed.), Incentives and Performance, edition 127, pages 241-257, Springer.
    3. Richard Münch, 2015. "Science in the Hands of Strategic Management: The Metrification of Scientific Work and Its Impact on the Evolution of Knowledge," Springer Books, in: Isabell M. Welpe & Jutta Wollersheim & Stefanie Ringelhan & Margit Osterloh (ed.), Incentives and Performance, edition 127, pages 33-48, Springer.
    4. Anatoliy G. Goncharuk & Natalia O. Lazareva & Ibrahim A. M. Alsharf, 2015. "Benchmarking As A Performance Management Method," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 11(2), pages 27-36, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yves Gingras & Mahdi Khelfaoui, 2018. "Assessing the effect of the United States’ “citation advantage” on other countries’ scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 517-532, February.
    2. Moreno, Blanca & López, Ana J. & García-Álvarez, María Teresa, 2012. "The electricity prices in the European Union. The role of renewable energies and regulatory electric market reforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 307-313.
    3. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2013. "A cross-country analysis of electricity market reforms: Potential contribution of New Institutional Economics," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 239-251.
    4. Bastianin, Andrea & Castelnovo, Paolo & Florio, Massimo, 2018. "Evaluating regulatory reform of network industries: a survey of empirical models based on categorical proxies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 115-128.
    5. Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2012. "Reforming the power sector in transition: Do institutions matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1675-1682.
    6. Barrientos, Jorge & Velilla, Esteban & Tobón Orozco, David & Villada, Fernando & López Lezama, Jesús M., 2018. "On the estimation of the price elasticity of electricity demand in the manufacturing industry of Colombia," Revista Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE, issue 88, pages 155-182, January.
    7. Zhang, Tao & Li, Hong-Zhou & Xie, Bai-Chen, 2022. "Have renewables and market-oriented reforms constrained the technical efficiency improvement of China's electric grid utilities?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    8. Oseni, Musiliu O. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2014. "Institutional arrangements for the promotion of regional integration of electricity markets : international experience," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6947, The World Bank.
    9. Carvalho, António, 2017. "Drivers of reported electricity service satisfaction in transition economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 151-157.
    10. MakajiÄ NikoliÄ, Dragana & Jednak, Sandra & BenkoviÄ, SlaÄana & PoznaniÄ, Vladimir, 2011. "Project finance risk evaluation of the Electric power industry of Serbia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6168-6177, October.
    11. Deane, J.P. & Driscoll, Á. & Gallachóir, B.P Ó, 2015. "Quantifying the impacts of national renewable electricity ambitions using a North–West European electricity market model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 604-609.
    12. Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2015. "Caught between theory and practice: Government, market, and regulatory failure in electricity sector reforms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 16-24.
    13. Elisa Borghi & Chiara Del Bo & Massimo Florio, 2016. "Institutions and Firms' Productivity: Evidence from Electricity Distribution in the EU," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 78(2), pages 170-196, April.
    14. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2011. "The impact of power market reforms on electricity price-cost margins and cross-subsidy levels: A cross country panel data analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1080-1092, March.
    15. Rabindra Nepal & Tooraj Jamasb & Clement Allan Tisdell, 2013. "Market-Related Reforms and Increased Energy Efficiency in Transition Countries: Empirical Evidence," Energy Economics and Management Group Working Papers 8-2013, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    16. Dominković, D.F. & Bačeković, I. & Ćosić, B. & Krajačić, G. & Pukšec, T. & Duić, N. & Markovska, N., 2016. "Zero carbon energy system of South East Europe in 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1517-1528.
    17. Gore, Christopher D. & Brass, Jennifer N. & Baldwin, Elizabeth & MacLean, Lauren M., 2019. "Political autonomy and resistance in electricity sector liberalization in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 193-209.
    18. Igor Bagayev & Boris Najman, 2013. "Less quality more costs: Does local power sector reliability matter for electricity intensity?," Erudite Working Paper 2013-03, Erudite.
    19. Daisy Shen & Qing Yang, . "Electricity Market Regulatory Reform and Competition – Case Study of the New Zealand Electricity Market," Chapters, in: Yanrui Wu & Xunpeng Shi & Fukunari Kimura (ed.), Energy Market Integration in East Asia: Theories, Electricity Sector and Subsidies, chapter 6, pages 103-140, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    20. Antonio Carvalho, 2015. "Reported Utility Service Satisfaction: The Case of Electricity in Transition Economies," CEERP Working Paper Series 001, Centre for Energy Economics Research and Policy, Heriot-Watt University, revised Nov 2015.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:206-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paula Bajdor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzpczpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.