IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04682-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new heuristic for understanding knowledge co-production processes: the co-innovation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Goñi Mazzitelli

    (Universidad de la República)

Abstract

While knowledge co-production has grown as a research approach and tool for addressing current complex problems, its analysis and application are not evident. This article introduces a heuristic tool designed to facilitate the characterisation of knowledge co-production processes, acknowledge the heterogeneity of their dynamics, and provide a developing analytical framework for their understanding and enhancement in the face of the challenges posed by complex problems. The tool is tested through the analysis of a case study involving a research group from Uruguay’s University of the Republic, which addresses issues related to unsustainable agricultural systems. The researchers designed and implemented—in collaboration with various stakeholders —a theoretical and methodological framework known as co-innovation, aimed at building a knowledge co-production process. The proposed analysis focuses on dynamics that integrate diverse forms of knowledge—from the expertise of family farmers to scientific knowledge—with the goal of establishing a knowledge co-production model. Three stages were identified in this process: problem framing (identifying and defining the problem); negotiation and knowledge integration dynamics (spaces created and methods used); and new ways of doing, using the co-produced knowledge, with the aim of transforming the identified problems. Results show how the concept of knowledge co-production is contextualised through the co-innovation approach, allowing for a situated reflection on the practices, learning processes, and tensions that emerge during its development.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Goñi Mazzitelli, 2025. "A new heuristic for understanding knowledge co-production processes: the co-innovation approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04682-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04682-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04682-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04682-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colnago, P. & Dogliotti, S., 2020. "Introducing labour productivity analysis in a co-innovation process to improve sustainability in mixed family farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Bianca Vienni-Baptista & María Goñi Mazzitelli & María Haydeé García Bravo & Inta Rivas Fauré & Daniel Felipe Marín-Vanegas & Cecilia Hidalgo, 2022. "Situated expertise in integration and implementation processes in Latin America," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Diana Mitlin & Jhono Bennett & Philipp Horn & Sophie King & Jack Makau & George Masimba Nyama, 2020. "Knowledge Matters: The Potential Contribution of the Coproduction of Research," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(3), pages 544-559, July.
    4. Hoffmann, Sabine & Pohl, Christian & Hering, Janet G., 2017. "Exploring transdisciplinary integration within a large research program: Empirical lessons from four thematic synthesis processes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 678-692.
    5. Ruggia, A. & Dogliotti, S. & Aguerre, V. & Albicette, M.M. & Albin, A. & Blumetto, O. & Cardozo, G. & Leoni, C. & Quintans, G. & Scarlato, S. & Tittonell, P. & Rossing, W.A.H., 2021. "The application of ecologically intensive principles to the systemic redesign of livestock farms on native grasslands: A case of co-innovation in Rocha, Uruguay," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Srinivasan, M.S. & Jongmans, C. & Bewsell, D. & Elley, G., 2019. "Research idea to science for impact: Tracing the significant moments in an innovation based irrigation study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 181-192.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bianca Vienni-Baptista & María Goñi Mazzitelli & María Haydeé García Bravo & Inta Rivas Fauré & Daniel Felipe Marín-Vanegas & Cecilia Hidalgo, 2022. "Situated expertise in integration and implementation processes in Latin America," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Sarah C. White, 0. "A Space for Unlearning? A Relational Perspective on North–South Development Research," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    3. Moojen, Fernanda Gomes & Ryschawy, Julie & dos Santos, Davi Teixeira & Barth Neto, Armindo & Vieira, Paulo Cardozo & Portella, Elisa & de Faccio Carvalho, Paulo César, 2022. "The farm coaching experience to support the transition to integrated crop–livestock systems: From gaming to action," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Berrueta, Cecilia & Giménez, Gustavo & Dogliotti, Santiago, 2021. "Scaling up from crop to farm level: Co-innovation framework to improve vegetable farm systems sustainability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Callum J Gunn & Sevgi E & Teresa Finlay & Lidewij Eva & Teun Zuiderent-Jerak & Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker-Warnaar, 2023. "Co-design and its consequences: developing a shared patient engagement framework in the IMI-PARADIGM project," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(6), pages 1018-1028.
    6. Dominique Hes & André Stephan & Sareh Moosavi, 2018. "Evaluating the Practice and Outcomes of Applying Regenerative Development to a Large-Scale Project in Victoria, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Brennan, Michael & Rondón-Sulbarán, Janeet, 2019. "Transdisciplinary research: Exploring impact, knowledge and quality in the early stages of a sustainable development project," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 481-491.
    8. Tomohiko Sakao, 2019. "Research Series Review for Transdisciplinarity Assessment—Validation with Sustainable Consumption and Production Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, September.
    9. French, Matthew A. & Barker, S. Fiona & Henry, Rebekah & Turagabeci, Amelia & Ansariadi, Ancha & Tela, Autiko & Ramirez-Lovering, Diego & Awaluddin, Fitriyanty & Latief, Ihsan & Vakarewa, Isoa & Taruc, 2024. "Responsible north–south research and innovation: A framework for transdisciplinary research leadership and management," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(7).
    10. Volkov, Artiom & Morkunas, Mangirdas & Balezentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2022. "Are agricultural sustainability and resilience complementary notions? Evidence from the North European agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Mark Wever & Alvaro Romera & Munir Shah & Nel Wognum, 2023. "Managing and Governing Integrated Research Programmes: Lessons from Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Cian O’Donovan & Aleksandra (Ola) Michalec & Joshua R Moon, 2022. "Capabilities for transdisciplinary research," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 145-158.
    13. Marion Borderon & Kelsea B. Best & Karen Bailey & Doug L. Hopping & Mackenzie Dove & Chelsea L. Cervantes de Blois, 2021. "The risks of invisibilization of populations and places in environment-migration research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Sarah C. White, 2020. "A Space for Unlearning? A Relational Perspective on North–South Development Research," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(3), pages 483-502, July.
    15. Ahmad Bathaei & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Agricultural Sustainability Indicators," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Lisa Verwoerd & Hilde Brouwers & Eva Kunseler & Barbara Regeer & Evelien de Hoop, 2023. "Negotiating space for knowledge co-production," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 59-71.
    17. Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Marta Guth & Adam Majchrzak & Andreea Cipriana Muntean & Silvia Ștefania Maican, 2021. "The Socio-Economics Factors in Family Farms with Different Economic Sustainability Levels from Central and Eastern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-12, July.
    18. Smith, D. Grace & Elwy, A. Rani & Rosen, Rochelle K. & Bueno, Mario & Sarkar, Indra Neil, 2024. "Who's in control? Situating expertise, (mis)trust, and power among the Latine/Hispanic community in COVID-19's liminal moments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 354(C).
    19. Nicholas, Graeme & Srinivasan, MS & Beechener, Sam & Foote, Jeff & Robson-Williams, Melissa & FitzHerbert, Stephen, 2020. "Transferring the impacts of pilot-scale studies to other scales: Understanding the role of non-biophysical factors using field-based irrigation studies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    20. Siebenhüner, Bernd, 2018. "Conflicts in Transdisciplinary Research: Reviewing Literature and Analysing a Case of Climate Adaptation in Northwestern Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 117-127.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04682-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.