IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v29y2017i5d10.1057_s41287-016-0073-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Perceptions of South Korea as Development Partner: Attractions and Strategic Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Sung-Mi Kim

    (University of Cambridge)

Abstract

Unlike a number of other Asian donors and development partners, including Development Assistance Committee (DAC) member Japan, South Korea has received an almost unqualified welcome as a provider of international assistance. This paper analyses why this is the case, examining three groupings of international actors: ‘traditional’ OECD-DAC Western donors; other Asian development partners, both DAC and non-DAC; and recipient countries. For each grouping, it offers a specific set of interests and contexts that have enabled South Korea to relatively successfully advance itself in the international development landscape. By demonstrating the disparate international perceptions of South Korea as a development partner, this paper reveals international actors’ strategic imperatives, and provides a critical reflection on the emerging discursive frames and institutional ecology of contemporary development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung-Mi Kim, 2017. "International Perceptions of South Korea as Development Partner: Attractions and Strategic Implications," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1086-1101, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:29:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1057_s41287-016-0073-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41287-016-0073-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41287-016-0073-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41287-016-0073-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosalind Eyben & Laura Savage, 2013. "Emerging and Submerging Powers: Imagined Geographies in the New Development Partnership at the Busan Fourth High Level Forum," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 457-469, April.
    2. Cooper, Andrew F. & Fues, Thomas, 2008. "Do the Asian Drivers Pull their Diplomatic Weight China, India, and the United Nations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 293-307, February.
    3. Kang, Sung Jin & Lee, Hongshik & Park, Bokyeong, 2011. "Does Korea follow Japan in foreign aid? Relationships between aid and foreign investment," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 19-27, January.
    4. repec:bla:devpol:v:27:y:2009:i:5:p:483-502 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Kitano, Naohiro & Harada, Yukinori, 2014. "Estimating China’s Foreign Aid 2001-2013," Working Papers 78, JICA Research Institute.
    6. Soyeun Kim, 2011. "Bridging Troubled Worlds? An Analysis Of The Ethical Case For South Korean Aid," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(6), pages 802-822, August.
    7. Fahimul Quadir, 2013. "Rising Donors and the New Narrative of ‘South–South’ Cooperation: what prospects for changing the landscape of development assistance programmes?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 321-338.
    8. Charles Gore & Charles Gore, 2013. "The New Development Cooperation Landscape: Actors, Approaches, Architecture," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 769-786, August.
    9. Rosalind Eyben, 2013. "Struggles in Paris: The DAC and the Purposes of Development Aid," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 25(1), pages 78-91, February.
    10. Lall, Sanjaya, 1994. "The East Asian miracle: Does the bell toll for industrial strategy?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 645-654, April.
    11. Thomas Kalinowski & Hyekyung Cho, 2012. "Korea's Search for a Global Role between Hard Economic Interests and Soft Power," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 24(2), pages 242-260, April.
    12. Matt Ferchen, 2013. "Whose China Model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 390-420, April.
    13. Charles Gore & Eun Mee Kim & Jae Eun Lee, 2013. "Busan And Beyond: South Korea And The Transition From Aid Effectiveness To Development Effectiveness," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 787-801, August.
    14. Hong-Min Chun & Elijah N. Munyi & Heejin Lee, 2010. "South Korea as an emerging donor: Challenges and changes on its entering OECD|DAC," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(6), pages 788-802.
    15. Ken Warwick, 2013. "Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 2, OECD Publishing.
    16. Frans-Paul van der Putten, 2013. "Harmony with Diversity: China’s Preferred World Order and Weakening Western Influence in the Developing World," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(1), pages 53-62, February.
    17. Myriam Dahman Saidi & Christina Wolf, 2011. "Recalibrating Development Co-operation: How Can African Countries Benefit from Emerging Partners?," OECD Development Centre Working Papers 302, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jamie Doucette, 2020. "Anxieties of an emerging donor: The Korean development experience and the politics of international development cooperation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(4), pages 656-673, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheryl McEwan & Emma Mawdsley, 2012. "Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(6), pages 1185-1209, November.
    2. Emma Mawdsley & Warwick E. Murray & John Overton & Regina Scheyvens & Glenn Banks, 2018. "Exporting stimulus and “shared prosperity†: Reinventing foreign aid for a retroliberal era," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 25-43, March.
    3. Katarzyna Andrzejczak & Agata Kliber, 2015. "The Model of French Development Assistance – Who Gets the Help?," Dynamic Econometric Models, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 15, pages 89-109.
    4. Sandrine Labory, 2014. "Determining Industrial Policy in Current Conditions of Competition," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 4, December.
    5. Yunus Turhan, 2022. "Turkey as an emerging donor in the development community: The Turkish‐type Development Assistance Model (TDAM)," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(4), July.
    6. Jo Hall, 2021. "Assessing the effectiveness of development co‐operation: Method matters," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(2), pages 266-282, March.
    7. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    8. Joren Verschaeve & Jan Orbie, 2018. "Ignoring the elephant in the room? Assessing the impact of the European Union on the Development Assistance Committee's role in international development," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 44-58, March.
    9. Behrooz Morvaridi & Caroline Hughes, 2018. "South–South Cooperation and Neoliberal Hegemony in a Post†aid World," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(3), pages 867-892, May.
    10. Stephen Brown, 2020. "The Rise and Fall of the Aid Effectiveness Norm," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(4), pages 1230-1248, September.
    11. Adam Moe Fejerskov & Erik Lundsgaarde & Signe Cold-Ravnkilde, 2017. "Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1070-1085, November.
    12. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2017. "Converging divergence? Unpacking the new geography of 21st century global development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 102017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    13. Michael Böheim, 2013. "Zur Renaissance der Industriepolitik. Ein neuer umfassender Politikansatz oder nur alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen?," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 86(12), pages 953-960, December.
    14. Manuel R. Agosin, 1997. "Export Performance in Chile: Lessons for Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1997-144, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Xia, Ying & Chen, Muyang, 2023. "The Janus face of stateness: China's development-oriented equity investments in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    16. Iliana Olivié & Aitor Pérez, 2016. "Why don’t donor countries coordinate their aid? A case study of European donors in Morocco," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(1), pages 52-64, January.
    17. Sterian Maria Gabriela, 2012. "Global Economic Governance And States: Still Important As Leaders?," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 68-73, July.
    18. Rory Horner, 2017. "What is global development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 202017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    19. Kilama, Eric Gabin, 2016. "The influence of China and emerging donors aid allocation: A recipient perspective," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 76-91.
    20. Russell, Martha G. & Smorodinskaya, Nataliya V., 2018. "Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 114-131.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:29:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1057_s41287-016-0073-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.