IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v25y2003i1p203-217.html

Utilizing Ultrasound Technology to Improve Livestock Marketing Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Jayson L. Lusk
  • Randall Little
  • Allen Williams
  • John Anderson
  • Blair McKinley

Abstract

This study estimates the value of using ultrasound technology to improve cattle marketing decisions by optimally choosing a particular marketing method. For the particular group of cattle analyzed, results indicate that using ultrasound information to selectively market cattle could have increased revenue by $25.53/head, $4.98/head, or $32.90/head, compared with simply marketing all animals on a live weight, dressed weight, or grid basis, respectively. Even if producers incorporate such information as placement weight, days on feed, and breed into their expectations about final carcass characteristics, our results indicate that ultrasound measures could improve average revenue by $4.16/head. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayson L. Lusk & Randall Little & Allen Williams & John Anderson & Blair McKinley, 2003. "Utilizing Ultrasound Technology to Improve Livestock Marketing Decisions," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 203-217.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:25:y:2003:i:1:p:203-217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-9353.00054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ferguson, Meagan & Anderson, John D., 2001. "Value Of Ultrasound-Based Predictions Of Carcass Quality Grade," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20620, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Koontz, Stephen R. & Hoag, Dana L. & Brethour, John R. & Walker, Jodine L., 2008. "Production Inefficiency in Fed Cattle Marketing and the Value of Sorting Pens into Alternative Marketing Groups Using Ultrasound Technology," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Dos Santos, Alecsandro & Anderson, John D. & Vann, Rhonda C. & Willard, Scott T., 2008. "Live Animal Ultrasound Information as a Decision Tool in Replacement Beef Heifer Programs," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 335-344, April.
    4. Norwood, F. Bailey & Lusk, Jayson L. & Brorsen, B. Wade, 2004. "Model Selection for Discrete Dependent Variables: Better Statistics for Better Steaks," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Fausti, Scott W. & Diersen, Matthew A. & Qasmi, Bashir A. & Li, Jing, 2010. "Value-Based Marketing: A Dsicussion of Issues and Trends in the Slaughter Cattle Market," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 27(01-2), pages 1-22.
    6. Thompson, Nathanael M. & DeVuyst, Eric A. & Brorsen, B. Wade & Lusk, Jayson L., 2016. "Using Genetic Testing to Improve Fed Cattle Marketing Decisions," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(2), May.
    7. Ardian Harri & John Michael Riley & John D. Anderson & Keith H. Coble, 2009. "Managing economic risk in value‐based marketing of fed cattle," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(3), pages 295-306, May.
    8. Lusk, Jayson L. & Norwood, F. Bailey & Brorsen, B. Wade, 2004. "Forecasting Limited Dependent Variables: Better Statistics For Better Steaks," 2004 Annual Meeting, February 14-18, 2004, Tulsa, Oklahoma 34612, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    9. Janzen, Matthew & Coatney, Kalyn T. & Rivera, Daniel & Harri, Ardian & Riley, John Michael & Busby, Darrell & Groves, Matt, 2017. "Fed Cattle Marketing: A Field Experiment," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252844, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:25:y:2003:i:1:p:203-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Oxford University Press to update the entry or send us the correct address or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.