IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ooecxx/v2y2023ip433-459..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internet and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Climent Quintana-Domeque
  • Jingya Zeng
  • Xiaohui Zhang

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic, the internet has become a key player in the daily lives of most people. We investigate the relationship between mental health and internet use frequency and purpose, 6 months after the first lockdown in the UK, in September 2020. Using data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study on the 12-item General Health Questionnaire and the internet use module, and controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and personality traits, we find that older individuals (aged 59 years or above) have a lower internet use frequency (twice a day or less). Younger women use the internet for social purposes more than men do, while younger men use the internet for leisure-and-learning purposes more than women and older men do. Interestingly, high internet use is a protective factor for social dysfunction among younger women, but a risk factor for psychological distress among younger men. While leisure-and-learning purpose is a protective factor for social dysfunction among younger women, it is a risk factor for social dysfunction among younger men. Finally, loneliness seems to play a role: higher internet frequency use is a stronger protective factor for social dysfunction among younger women who feel lonelier but a stronger risk factor for mental health among younger men who feel lonelier.

Suggested Citation

  • Climent Quintana-Domeque & Jingya Zeng & Xiaohui Zhang, 2023. "Internet and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the UK," Oxford Open Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2, pages 433-459.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ooecxx:v:2:y:2023:i::p:433-459.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ooec/odac007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ooecxx:v:2:y:2023:i::p:433-459.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ooec .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.