IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jeurec/v23y2025i6p2165-2211..html

Reservation Wages and Workers’ Valuation of Job Flexibility: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Kuan-Ming Chen
  • Ning Ding
  • John A List
  • Magne Mogstad

Abstract

We quantify how labor supply elasticities and reservation wages vary between people and over time, and infer workers’ valuation of flexibility in their choices of work hours. Economists and policymakers are keenly interested in these quantities, especially lately with the growth in jobs that offer flexible work schedules. Our study takes advantage of a large natural field experiment at Uber, the largest ride-sharing company. Combining this experiment with high-frequency panel data on wages and individual work decisions, we estimate a dynamic labor supply model that let us recover reservation wages, labor supply elasticities, and workers’ valuation of flexibility. We also show the biases in reservation wages and labor supply elasticities that arise if one uses observational data on wages or a static labor supply model.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuan-Ming Chen & Ning Ding & John A List & Magne Mogstad, 2025. "Reservation Wages and Workers’ Valuation of Job Flexibility: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 23(6), pages 2165-2211.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:23:y:2025:i:6:p:2165-2211.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvaf022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:23:y:2025:i:6:p:2165-2211.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jeea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.