IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jafrec/v28y2019i1p1-17..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Effects of Genocide: Evidence from Rwanda

Author

Listed:
  • Roland Hodler

Abstract

Cross-country studies on the economic consequences of internal political violence typically find short-run effects that are not very large, and no evidence for full economic recovery. We study the economic impact of the Rwandan genocide in 1994, which has been one of the most intense events of political violence since World War II. More precisely, we estimate its effect on economic development using the synthetic control method and addressing data quality issues that have been a concern in the literature. We find a 58% decrease in GDP in 1994. This effect still corresponds to a decrease in GDP per capita of around 31% when taking into account that 800,000 people were killed and that around two million fled the country during the genocide. We further provide strong evidence that Rwanda’s economy was then catching up with the estimated counterfactual GDP it would have had in absence of the genocide, with the gap closing after 17 years. When focusing on the effects on the Rwandan exports as reported by the importing countries, we find similar short-run effects but somewhat slower recovery. We finally show that agriculture was less severely hit by the genocide than the industry and service sectors, and that it also recovered much more quickly.

Suggested Citation

  • Roland Hodler, 2019. "The Economic Effects of Genocide: Evidence from Rwanda," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 28(1), pages 1-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:28:y:2019:i:1:p:1-17.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jae/ejy008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Becker, Sascha O. & Mukand, Sharun & Yotzov, Ivan, 2022. "Persecution, pogroms and genocide: A conceptual framework and new evidence," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Martin Philipp Heger & Eric Neumayer, 2022. "Economic legacy effects of armed conflict: Insights from the civil war in Aceh, Indonesia," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(4), pages 394-421, July.
    3. Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Mohammad Ali Kadivar, 2023. "The effect of Islamic revolution and war on income inequality in Iran," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 1007-1026, August.
    4. Joseph Mawejje & Patrick McSharry, 2021. "The economic cost of conflict: Evidence from South Sudan," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 1969-1990, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:28:y:2019:i:1:p:1-17.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.