IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/apecpp/v37y2015i1p107-129..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetric Information and Profit Taking in Crop Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Cory G. Walters
  • C. Richard Shumway
  • Hayley H. Chouinard
  • Philip R. Wandschneider

Abstract

Excess returns to producers insured by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation can arise due to asymmetric information or from the design of the insurance programs themselves. Using unique, unit-level crop insurance contract data for major crops such as corn, soybeans, and wheat in five growing regions, we find evidence that producers in most regions may profit by selecting optional units, buy-up coverage, or by using transitional yields to participate in the federal crop insurance program. We also find evidence that advantages increase with land resource heterogeneity. However, the results do not support hypotheses that producers profit by selecting revenue insurance, nor that high levels of government "incompetence" exist in the design and administration of the crop insurance system.

Suggested Citation

  • Cory G. Walters & C. Richard Shumway & Hayley H. Chouinard & Philip R. Wandschneider, 2015. "Asymmetric Information and Profit Taking in Crop Insurance," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 37(1), pages 107-129.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:37:y:2015:i:1:p:107-129.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/ppu022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sharma, S. & Walters, C., 2018. "Influence of Farm and Lease Type on Crop Insurance Returns," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277399, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Rolandas Drejeris & Martynas Rusteika, 2022. "New Approach to the Public Authorities’ Activities Development in the Crop Insurance System: Lithuanian Case," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Marco Rogna & Günter Schamel & Alex Weissensteiner, 2023. "Modelling the switch from hail insurance to antihail nets," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(1), pages 118-136, January.
    4. Fabio G Santeramo, 2019. "I Learn, You Learn, We Gain Experience in Crop Insurance Markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 284-304, June.
    5. Rocha, Jr., Adauto B. & Fulginiti, Lilyan E. & Perrin, Richard K. & Walters, Cory G., 2022. "What is the value of crop insurance for Nebraskan farmers?," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322529, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Guoyong Wu & Jianwei Cheng & Fan Yang, 2022. "The Influence of the Peer Effect on Farmers’ Agricultural Insurance Decision: Evidence from the Survey Data of the Karst Region in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Sankalp Sharma & Cory G. Walters, 2020. "Influence of farm size and insured type on crop insurance returns," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 440-452, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:37:y:2015:i:1:p:107-129.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.