IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/jrojbe/v9y2024i2p71-82.html

Knowledge Sharing In Business And Competitive Intelligence: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolae Alexandru BUDEANU

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Over the past years, business intelligence and competitive intelligence practices achieved a significant importance in organizations, due to their capability of providing the necessary knowledge for the decision-makers, providing a significant advantage against market competitors or internal and external threats and vulnerabilities. Also, business intelligence and competitive intelligence have been under researcher’s scope, the literature in those domains being continuously updated with new findings. Also, knowledge sharing is a process that helps organizations increase their employees understanding and expertise in certain fields, being highly recognized by both practitioners and researchers for its importance and efficiency. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to analyze the state of the literature in business intelligence and competitive intelligence, in correlation with knowledge sharing concept, in order to identify the connections between these domains. Also, this article aims to present an analysis that could provide a better understanding about the research interest in integrating knowledge sharing in business intelligence and competitive intelligence practices. In order to achieve the proposed objective, this research performs a bibliometric analysis using VOSViewer, a specialized software designed for creating visualizing maps that present networks between specific items. The information used for conducting this research was retrieved from Web of Science core collection and Scopus, world’s largest index databases.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolae Alexandru BUDEANU, 2024. "Knowledge Sharing In Business And Competitive Intelligence: A Bibliometric Analysis," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 71-82, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:9:y:2024:i:2:p:71-82
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ojbe.steconomiceuoradea.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/OJBE-92_fin-71-82.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    2. Ettore Bolisani & Constantin Bratianu, 2018. "Emergent Knowledge Strategies," Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, Springer, number 978-3-319-60657-6, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ion Popa & Simona Cătălina Ștefan, 2019. "Modeling the Pathways of Knowledge Management Towards Social and Economic Outcomes of Health Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Budeanu Nicolae Alexandru, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis Regarding Knowledge Strategies in Intelligence Structures," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1179-1192, July.
    3. Tran Huy Phuong, 2019. "How authentic leadership promotes individual knowledge sharing: viewing from the lens of COR theory," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 386-401, December.
    4. Daniel Lovin & Monica Raducan & Alexandru Capatina & Nicoleta Cristache, 2021. "Sustainable Knowledge Transfer from Business Simulations to Working Environments: Correlational vs. Configurational Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Constantin Bratianu & Dan Florin Stanescu & Rares Mocanu, 2021. "Exploring the Knowledge Management Impact on Business Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Yang Cai & Youming Song & Xia Xiao & Wendian Shi, 2020. "The Effect of Social Capital on Tacit Knowledge-Sharing Intention: The Mediating Role of Employee Vigor," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    7. Farhanah Fitria MUSTARI & Achmad GHAZALI, 2022. "Exploring Tacit Knowledge Sharing Enhancer Factors in Non- Profit Organizations Paper," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 67-78, February.
    8. Ana Villar & César Camisón Zornoza & Montserrat Boronat, 2009. "New challenges in competitiveness: knowledge development and coopetition," Working Papers. Serie EC 2009-04, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    9. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    10. Roberto Cerchione & Emilio Esposito & Maria Rosaria Spadaro, 2015. "The Spread of Knowledge Management in SMEs: A Scenario in Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Olunifesi Adekunle Suraj, 2016. "Managing Telecommunications for Development: An Analysis of Intellectual Capital in Nigerian Telecommunication Industry," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-30, March.
    12. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    13. Vu Minh Ngo & Huan Huu Nguyen & Giang Huong Thi Vuong, 2025. "Coping with global climate change in the post-COVID-19 pandemic: the roles of business perception and resources in adaptation strategy decisions," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Scott, Allen J., 2010. "Cultural economy and the creative field of the city," MPRA Paper 32108, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. M. Max Evans & Ilja Frissen & Anthony K. P. Wensley, 2018. "Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    16. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    17. David Israel Contreras-Medina & Luis Miguel Contreras-Medina & Verónica Cerroblanco-Vázquez & María del Consuelo Gallardo-Aguilar & José Porfirio González-Farías & Sergio Ernesto Medina-Cuellar & Andr, 2025. "Reorienting Innovations for Sustainable Agriculture: A Study Based on Bean’s Traditional Knowledge Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Esther Tippmann & Pamela Sharkey Scott & Andrew Parker, 2017. "Boundary Capabilities in MNCs: Knowledge Transformation for Creative Solution Development," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 455-482, June.
    19. Maurizio Zollo, 1998. "Strategies or Routines ? Knowledge Codification, Path-Dependence and the Evolution of Post-Acquisition Integration Practices in the U.S. Banking Industry," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 97-10, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    20. Nicholas A. Athanassiou & Kendall Roth, 2006. "International experience heterogeneity effects on top management team advice networks: A hierarchical analysis," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 749-770, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:9:y:2024:i:2:p:71-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomina SAVEANU The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tomina SAVEANU to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.