IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/jrojbe/v5y2020ispecialp55-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convergence/Divergence Analysis And Differentiation In Macroeconomic Variables In The Development Of The Russian Federation

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksy Kornowski

    (Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the economic development and the diversification of the individual regions of the Russian Federation (RF) on the basis of taxonomic indices and a convergence/divergence analysis of five macroeconomic variables, namely registered unemployment rate, investment per capita, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, wages, and the number of organizations conducting research and development (R&D) per million inhabitants, for the period between 2000 and 2012 (the period was chosen due to lack of data for years 2014, 2015 and 2016 for few regions). The study covers 79 regions, and the data used for the analyses comes from the Russian Statistical. The principal method of analysis is the taxonomic index based on Euclidean metrics. The spatial differentiation in the development of RF regions demonstrates the specific character of the individual regions of Russia. The analysis made leads to the conclusion that the most developed regions in terms of the analyzed variables are of industrial and mining character, while the least developed ones are agricultural in character. The structure of this paper is as follows: the spatial differentiation of macroeconomic variables in RF regions, registered unemployment rate, per capita investment, per capita GDP, wages, and number of organizations conducting R&D activities per million inhabitants is discussed in section 2; the definition of a taxonomic index based on Euclidean metrics is presented in section 3; the analysis of the diversified development of RF regions based on taxonomic indicators is given in section 4, a preliminary convergence/divergence analysis is presented in section 5, while section 6 provides a key conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksy Kornowski, 2020. "Convergence/Divergence Analysis And Differentiation In Macroeconomic Variables In The Development Of The Russian Federation," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5(special), pages 55-68, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:5:y:2020:i:special:p:55-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ojbe.steconomiceuoradea.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/OJBE_vol-5special_fin-55-68.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nazrul Islam, 2003. "What have We Learnt from the Convergence Debate?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 309-362, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonin Bergeaud & Gilbert Cette & Rémy Lecat, 2014. "Le produit intérieur brut par habitant sur longue période en France et dans les pays avancés : le rôle de la productivité et de l’emploi," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 474(1), pages 5-34.
    2. Massimiliano Affinito, 2011. "Convergence clubs, the euro-area rank and the relationship between banking and real convergence," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 809, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    3. Zhao, Xueting & Burnett, J. Wesley & Lacombe, Donald J., 2014. "Province-level Convergence of China CO2 Emission Intensity," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169403, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. J.Ph. Boussemart & K. Kerstens & S. Blancard & W. Briec, 2007. "Technology Adoption in French Agriculture and the role of Financial Constraints," Post-Print hal-00287974, HAL.
    5. Don J. Webber & Min-Hua Jen & Eoin O'Leary, 2014. "Regional productivity in a multi-speed Europe," Working Papers 20141408, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    6. Daniel Stavárek & Lucie Tomanova, 2014. "Is the Region of Visegrad Countries on the Track to the Euro Area? Recent Evidence from the Real Convergence Perspective," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 130-139.
    7. Dale W. Jorgenson, 2007. "Information Technology and the G7 Economies," NBER Chapters, in: Hard-to-Measure Goods and Services: Essays in Honor of Zvi Griliches, pages 325-350, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Rughoo, Aarti & You, Kefei, 2016. "Asian financial integration: Global or regional? Evidence from money and bond markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 419-434.
    9. Lajos Baráth & Imre Fertő, 2017. "Productivity and Convergence in European Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 228-248, February.
    10. Adriana Di Liberto, 2007. "Convergence and Divergence in Neoclassical Growth Models with Human Capital," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 289-322.
    11. Giovanni Caggiano & Leone Leonida, 2013. "Multimodality in the distribution of GDP and the absolute convergence hypothesis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1203-1215, June.
    12. Robert Inklaar & Marcel P. Timmer, 2012. "Productivity Convergence Across Industries and Countries: The Importance of Theory-based Measurement," Chapters, in: Matilde Mas & Robert Stehrer (ed.), Industrial Productivity in Europe, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Camilla Mastromarco & Laura Serlenga & Yongcheol Shin, 2012. "Is Globalization Driving Efficiency? A Threshold Stochastic Frontier Panel Data Modeling Approach," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 563-579, August.
    14. Simplice A. Asongu & Jacinta C. Nwachukwu, 2016. "Revolution empirics: predicting the Arab Spring," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 439-482, September.
    15. Valerien O. Pede & Raymond J. G. M. Florax & Henri L. F. De Groot, 2007. "Technological Leadership, Human Capital and Economic Growth: a Spatial Econometric Analysis for US Counties, 1969-2003," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 87-88, pages 103-124.
    16. Fulvio Castellacci, 2011. "Closing the Technology Gap?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 180-197, February.
    17. Azomahou, Théophile T. & El ouardighi, Jalal & Nguyen-Van, Phu & Pham, Thi Kim Cuong, 2011. "Testing convergence of European regions: A semiparametric approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 1202-1210, May.
    18. Catherine Figuière & Laëtitia Guilhot & Cyriac Guillaumin, 2013. "La question du régime de change en Asie de l'Est : Vers un bloc monétaire régional ?," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 123(2), pages 265-298.
    19. Daniel Nepelski & Giuditta De Prato, 2020. "Technological complexity and economic development," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 448-470, May.
    20. Rumen Dobrinsky & Peter Havlik, 2014. "Economic Convergence and Structural Change: the Role of Transition and EU Accession," wiiw Research Reports 395, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Russian Federation; economic development; regional economic development; differentiation of macroeconomic variables.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:5:y:2020:i:special:p:55-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomina SAVEANU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.