IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v34y2025i2p465-473.html

Strategic Management Of Leadership Succession And Relevant Economic Actors

Author

Listed:
  • Ivett STUMPF-TAMÁS

    (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Gerontology, Nyíregyháza, Hungary)

  • Marianna MÓRÉ

    (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Gerontology, Nyíregyháza, Hungary)

Abstract

Leadership succession is a process of strategic importance in the life of every organization, as the successful transfer of management and ownership rights has a fundamental impact on long-term competitiveness, sustainability, and value creation. Succession is not a one-time event, but a complex, multi-step process shaped by organizational, human, and environmental factors.The aim of this study is to present the theoretical and practical aspects of succession, with particular emphasis on the gradual transfer of management functions and the economic challenges that arise from this. The literature distinguishes between two basic approaches: gradual models, which emphasize the step-by-step nature of succession, and life cycle theories, which link leadership change to the phases of organizational development. Handler’s “legacy dance” model describes in detail the process of role transformation between predecessor and successor. In the initial phase, the predecessor plays a dominant role, while the successor gradually increases their decision-making competence and eventually becomes a full-fledged leader. The predecessor retreats into an advisory role, facilitating the gradual transfer of knowledge and maintaining organizational stability. The success of succession is influenced by the motivation of both parties, generational differences, and differences in leadership styles and values. The personality, age, and decision- making willingness of the founder are decisive factors, while the preparedness, motivation, and leadership competencies of the successor are key. In family businesses, succession is a particularly sensitive process due to the intertwining of ownership and management functions, but the issue is also relevant in the case of non-profit and community organizations, such as associations, where a change in leadership affects institutional legitimacy and the maintenance of trust. The literature distinguishes between three main models: the rational model, which emphasizes efficiency; the vicious circle model, which attributes succession failures to organizational disruptions; and the ritual scapegoating model, which interprets leadership change as a symbolic response to crisis. According to the integrative approach of the latest research, the success of succession is influenced not only by individual and organizational factors, but also by the industry and macroeconomic environment. Overall, succession is a strategic process based on trust, gradual transfer of responsibility, and intergenerational cooperation, which is one of the keys to the long-term economic survival of organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivett STUMPF-TAMÁS & Marianna MÓRÉ, 2025. "Strategic Management Of Leadership Succession And Relevant Economic Actors," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 465-473, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:465-473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Ivett-STUMPF-TAMAS-Marianna-MORE.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jess H. Chua & James J. Chrisman & Pramodita Sharma, 1999. "Defining the Family Business by Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(4), pages 19-39, July.
    2. Neil C. Churchill & Kenneth J. Hatten, 1987. "Non-Market-Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework for Family Businesses," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 12(2), pages 53-66, October.
    3. Brickley, James A., 2003. "Empirical research on CEO turnover and firm-performance: a discussion," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 227-233, December.
    4. Neil C. Churchill & Kenneth J. Hatten, 1987. "Non-Market-Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework for Family Businesses," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 11(3), pages 51-64, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sue Birley, 2002. "Attitudes of Owner-Managers' Children towards Family and Business Issues," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 26(3), pages 5-19, April.
    2. Andrea GANZAROLI & Gianluca FISCATO & Luciano PILOTTI, 2006. "Does business succession enhance firms’ innovation capacity? Results from an exploratory analysis in Italian SMEs," Departmental Working Papers 2006-29, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    3. Collin, Sven-Olof Yrjö & Ahlberg, Jenny, 2012. "Blood in the boardroom: Family relationships influencing the functions of the board," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 207-219.
    4. Suveera Gill & Parmjit Kaur, 2015. "Family Involvement in Business and Financial Performance: A Panel Data Analysis," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 40(4), pages 395-420, December.
    5. Schickinger, Antonia & Bierl, Philipp A. & Leitterstorf, Max P. & Kammerlander, Nadine, 2023. "Family-related goals, entrepreneurial investment behavior, and governance mechanisms of single family offices: An exploratory study," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    6. Mahto, Raj & McDowell, William C. & Davis, Peter, 2020. "Influence and values: The connection between participation and commitment in family firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 354-362.
    7. James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Allison W. Pearson & Tim Barnett, 2012. "Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family–Centered Non–Economic Goals in Small Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(2), pages 267-293, March.
    8. Thomas M. Zellweger & Franz W. Kellermanns & James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua, 2012. "Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 851-868, June.
    9. Carr, Jon C. & Sequeira, Jennifer M., 2007. "Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: A Theory of Planned Behavior approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(10), pages 1090-1098, October.
    10. Pramodita Sharma & Jess Chua, 2013. "Asian family enterprises and family business research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 641-656, September.
    11. Wright, Mike & Kellermanns, Franz W., 2011. "Family firms: A research agenda and publication guide," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 187-198.
    12. Shujun Ding & Baozhi Qu & Zhenyu Wu, 2016. "Family Control, Socioemotional Wealth, and Governance Environment: The Case of Bribes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 639-654, July.
    13. Cater, John James & Kidwell, Roland E., 2014. "Function, governance, and trust in successor leadership groups in family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 217-228.
    14. Priya Dhamija Gupta & Sonali Bhattacharya, 2016. "Impact of Knowledge Management Processes for Sustainability of Small Family Businesses: Evidences from the Brassware Sector of Moradabad (India)," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 1-46, December.
    15. Britta Boyd & Isabel C. Botero & Tomasz A. Fediuk, 2014. "Incumbent Decisions about Succession Transitions in Family Firms: A Conceptual Model," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-24, November.
    16. Ayranci, Evren, . "Family involvement in and institutionalization of family businesses: A research," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 3(3), pages 1-22.
    17. Rodrigo Basco & Andrea Calabrò, 2017. "“Whom do I want to be the next CEO?” Desirable successor attributes in family firms," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(4), pages 487-509, May.
    18. El Fasiki, Hamza, 2013. "The Family Business in Collectivist Societies: Traits and Implications," MPRA Paper 48857, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. George C. Rubenson & Anil K. Gupta, 1997. "The Initial Succession: A Contingency Model of Founder Tenure," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 21(2), pages 21-36, January.
    20. Yangyang Qi & Jiong Wu, 2023. "Performance feedback, succession process and innovative activities of family firms: evidence from China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 765-791, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:465-473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.