IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbbu/y2025iq4-25-2b2.html

Crypto assets in Austria: robust evidence from HFCS wave 5 on ownership, motives and portfolio implications

Author

Listed:
  • Pirmin Fessler

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Economic Analysis Division)

  • Beat Weber

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank)

Abstract

Using the 2023 Austrian Household Finance and Consumption Survey (HFCS), which featured a dedicated crypto asset module, we provide the first probabilistic, nationally representative estimates of Austrian households’ crypto asset ownership in a balance sheet context. Weighted results show that 3.9% of Austrian households (i.e. about 161,000) hold crypto assets. Crypto asset ownership is concentrated among younger (8% under 30), male (5.4% vs. 2.9% female), highly educated (7.6% vs. 0.3% less well educated), self-employed (13.3%) and urban holders. Most households entered the crypto asset market during 2019–2021, with a peak in 2020, and 75% acquired crypto assets via crypto exchanges. Bitcoin is held by about 80% and ether by roughly 40% of crypto-owning households. Median holdings are EUR 3,000, rising to EUR 20,000 at the 95th percentile; in most cases, crypto assets account for less than 20% of households’ financial assets. The most frequently cited motivations are investment and/or speculation (40%), curiosity (24%) and trend participation (16%). Hardly any crypto asset holders intend or expect to use crypto assets to make payments. Portfolio analysis shows that crypto assets complement traditional risky assets, raising risky asset participation from 16.6% to 39.0% among holders and constituting the main risky exposure for many lower-wealth households. We also relate our results to other sources, including data on customers of crypto intermediaries and on taxable revenue, which offer complementary perspectives without allowing for direct empirical alignment.

Suggested Citation

  • Pirmin Fessler & Beat Weber, 2025. "Crypto assets in Austria: robust evidence from HFCS wave 5 on ownership, motives and portfolio implications," OeNB Bulletin, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q4/25-2, pages 1-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbbu:y:2025:i:q4/25-2:b:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:5e5ae2e3-e639-41fc-a31b-4c7330656fb5/oenb-bulletin-q4-25-crypto-assets-in-austria.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hasso, Tim & Pelster, Matthias & Breitmayer, Bastian, 2019. "Who trades cryptocurrencies, how do they trade it, and how do they perform? Evidence from brokerage accounts," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 64-74.
    2. Hermans, Lieven & Ianiro, Annalaura & Kochanska, Urszula & Törmälehto, Veli-Matti & van der Kraaij, Anton & Simón, Josep M. Vendrell, 2022. "Decrypting financial stability risks in crypto-asset markets," Financial Stability Review, European Central Bank, vol. 1.
    3. Daniela Balutel & Marie-Hélène Felt & Gradon Nicholls & Marcel-Cristian Voia, 2024. "Bitcoin awareness, ownership and use: 2016–20," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1), pages 33-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pirmin Fessler & Beat Weber, 2025. "Crypto assets in Austria: robust evidence from HFCS wave 5 on ownership, motives and portfolio implications," OeNB Bulletin, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q4/25-2, pages 1-28.
    2. Carbó-Valverde, Santiago & Cuadros-Solas, Pedro J. & Rodríguez-Fernández, Francisco, 2025. "Cryptocurrency ownership and cognitive biases in perceived financial literacy," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    3. Ahmed Bouteska & Murad Harasheh, 2026. "Decoding the crypto crowd: how social media sentiment predicts Ethereum’s price," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Saggese, Pietro & Belmonte, Alessandro & Dimitri, Nicola & Facchini, Angelo & Böhme, Rainer, 2023. "Arbitrageurs in the Bitcoin ecosystem: Evidence from user-level trading patterns in the Mt. Gox exchange platform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 251-270.
    5. Bouteska, Ahmed & Sharif, Taimur & Isskandarani, Layal & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2025. "Market efficiency and its determinants: Macro-level dynamics and micro-level characteristics of cryptocurrencies," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Vesa Pursiainen & Jan Toczynski, 2023. "Retail Investors’ Cryptocurrency Investments," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 23-51, Swiss Finance Institute.
    7. Gemayel, Roland & Preda, Alex, 2021. "Performance and learning in an ambiguous environment: A study of cryptocurrency traders," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Luca Mungo & Silvia Bartolucci & Laura Alessandretti, 2023. "Cryptocurrency co-investment network: token returns reflect investment patterns," Papers 2301.02027, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    9. Andreas Hackethal & Tobin Hanspal & Dominique M Lammer & Kevin Rink, 2022. "The Characteristics and Portfolio Behavior of Bitcoin Investors: Evidence from Indirect Cryptocurrency Investments [The investor in structured retail products: advice driven or gambling oriented]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(4), pages 855-898.
    10. Tingyi Lin, 2026. "A Blessing in Disguise? DeFi Exploits and Short-Horizon Responses in U.S. Commercial Paper Spreads," Papers 2601.08263, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    11. Matteo Benetton & Giovanni Compiani, 2024. "Investors’ Beliefs and Cryptocurrency Prices," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 197-236.
    12. Jeffrey L. Hoopes & Tyler S. Menzer & Jaron H. Wilde, 2026. "Who reports cryptocurrency to the IRS?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 453-488, March.
    13. Aggarwal, Divya & Chandrasekaran, Shabana & Annamalai, Balamurugan, 2020. "A complete empirical ensemble mode decomposition and support vector machine-based approach to predict Bitcoin prices," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    14. José Almeida & Tiago Cruz Gonçalves, 2024. "Cryptocurrency market microstructure: a systematic literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 1035-1068, January.
    15. Vlachou, Maria & Konstantakis, Konstantinos N. & Drivas, Kyriakos & Michaelides, Panayotis G., 2026. "Cryptocurrencies, technological and market activities: Tango for three?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    16. Hwang Kim, 2024. "An empirical analysis of navigation behaviors across stock and cryptocurrency trading platforms: implications for targeting and segmentation strategies," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 2113-2141, September.
    17. Cascavilla, Alessandro, 2023. "Between money and speculative asset: the role of financial literacy on the perception towards Bitcoin in Italy," MPRA Paper 118472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Crépellière, Tommy & Pelster, Matthias & Zeisberger, Stefan, 2023. "Arbitrage in the market for cryptocurrencies," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Pattnaik, Debidutta & Hassan, M. Kabir & Dsouza, Arun & Tiwari, Aviral & Devji, Shridev, 2023. "Ex-post facto analysis of cryptocurrency literature over a decade using bibliometric technique," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Matthias Pelster & Bastian Breitmayer & Tim Hasso, 2019. "Are cryptocurrency traders pioneers or just risk-seekers? Evidence from brokerage accounts," Papers 1906.11968, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbbu:y:2025:i:q4/25-2:b:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alisa Besirevic-Abdagic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.